<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Bill Hobbs</title>
      <link>http://billhobbs.com/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:01 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.35</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Lives, Fortune, Sacred Honor</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><br />
<a href="http://billhobbs.com/declaration_of_independence.jpg"><img alt="declaration_of_independence.jpg" src="http://billhobbs.com/declaration_of_independence-thumb.jpg" border=0 width="400" height="471" /></a><br />
The <a href="http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html"><strong>Declaration of Independence</strong></a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/lives_fortune_sacred_honor.html</link>
         <guid>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/lives_fortune_sacred_honor.html</guid>
         <category>America the Beautiful</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:01 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Bredesen: McCain a &quot;Very Attractive Candidate&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen - who has made news a lot this campaign season by stating the obvious - that Democrats don't have a chance to beat incumbent U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander, and that Tennessee isn't likely to go for Barack Obama - has <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/07/interview_with_governor_bredes.html"><b>done it again</b></a>, telling <i>Real Clear Politics</i> that "John McCain is very attractive as a candidate in a lot of ways."</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/bredesen_mccain_a_very_attract.html</link>
         <guid>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/bredesen_mccain_a_very_attract.html</guid>
         <category>Campaign Season</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:49:31 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Rebellion</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Steve Gill <a href="http://politics.nashvillepost.com/2008/07/03/he-dont-know-me-he-dont-know-my-address/"><strong>remembers the good old days</strong></a>. If you're looking for a very good and <a href="http://billhobbs.com/2005/02/tennessee_tax_revolt_retold.html"><strong>accurate</strong></a> history of the Tennessee income tax wars, get a copy of Phil Valentine's book <i>Tax Revolt: The rebellion against an overbearing, bloated, arrogant and abusive government</i>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/rebellion.html</link>
         <guid>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/rebellion.html</guid>
         <category>Tennessee Government News</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:33:00 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Software Never Blinks</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><i>Business Week</i> warns bloggers: <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2008/tc20080625_325222.htm"><strong>Big Media Is Watching</strong></a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/the_software_never_blinks.html</link>
         <guid>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/the_software_never_blinks.html</guid>
         <category>Journalism &amp; Media</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:33:41 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Blogger Beats Lawyer, Again</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Glenn Reynolds reports that Clifford Shoemaker, the Virginia trial lawyer who subpoenaed blogging librarian Kathy Seidel, <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/archives2/021199.php"><b>got spanked by the judge for his efforts</b></a>. Here's <a href="http://billhobbs.com/2008/04/blogger_beats_trial_lawyer_at.html"><b>background</b></a> on the case. Seidel wrote her own motion to quash the subpoena and won - and now a judge has sanctioned the lawyer as well. As I <a href="http://billhobbs.com/2008/04/blogger_beats_trial_lawyer_at.html"><b>wrote</b></a> back in April, her motion was a brilliantly written defense of her First Amendment rights.</p>

<p>And here's the rest of the happy ending: For quite some time to come, all the many, many blog posts about the Shoemaker-Seidel legal tussle will appear near the top of the Google search result for "Clifford Shoemaker," so future potential clients of his will be able to learn that he's a malicious hack of low ethics who got beat in court <em>by a librarian</em>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/blogger_beats_lawyer_again.html</link>
         <guid>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/blogger_beats_lawyer_again.html</guid>
         <category>Blogging</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:16:32 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Against It Before He Was For It</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>With his announcement of opposition to a proposed amendment to the state of California's constitution banning gay marriage, "Obama is skating gingerly past his previous position on the issue," <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/01/MN8J11I731.DTL&type=politics"><strong>reports</strong></a> the <i>San Francisco Chronicle</i>. He's been doing that a lot lately.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/against_it_before_he_was_for_i.html</link>
         <guid>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/against_it_before_he_was_for_i.html</guid>
         <category>Campaign Season</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:53:55 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>What a Rush</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The upcoming edition of <em>The New York Times Sunday Magazine</em> has an excellent lengthy profile of Rush Limbaugh. It's already <a href=“http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/06/magazine/06Limbaugh-t.html?_r=4&hp=&oref=slogin&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin&oref=slogin”><strong>online</strong></a>. Here's a bit of it that I found rather interesting, though not actually surprising:<blockquote>Recently, Pew reported that, on a series of "news knowledge questions," Limbaugh's "Dittoheads" - the defiantly self-mocking term for his faithful, supposedly brainwashed, audience - scored higher than NPR listeners. The study found that "readers of newsmagazines, political magazines and business magazines, listeners of Rush Limbaugh and NPR and viewers of the Daily Show and C-SPAN are also much more likely than the average person to have a college degree."</blockquote>And this bit, too:<blockquote>Limbaugh entertains, but he also instructs. He provides his listeners with news and views they can use, and he teaches them how to employ it. "Rush is an intellectual-force multiplier," Rove told me. "His listeners are, themselves, communicators."</blockquote>Read <a href=“http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/06/magazine/06Limbaugh-t.html?_r=4&hp=&oref=slogin&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin&oref=slogin”><b>the whole thing</b></a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/what_a_rush.html</link>
         <guid>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/what_a_rush.html</guid>
         <category>Journalism &amp; Media</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:09:35 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>&quot;You just can&apos;t beat John McCain.&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Matthew Currier Burden <a href="http://www.blackfive.net/main/2008/07/you-just-cant-b.html"><b>explains why</b></a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/you_just_cant_beat_john_mccain.html</link>
         <guid>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/you_just_cant_beat_john_mccain.html</guid>
         <category>Campaign Season</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:00:25 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>&apos;Dig It&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><object width="250"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cZqcMNA1DGI&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cZqcMNA1DGI&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="250"></embed></object></p>

<p>Here's a brief biographical video of some of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZqcMNA1DGI"><strong>Barack Obama's earliest political patrons</strong></a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/dig_it.html</link>
         <guid>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/dig_it.html</guid>
         <category>Campaign Season</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 09:49:13 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Pork and Payoffs</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="tnflag.jpg" align=right hspace=4 src="http://billhobbs.com/hobbsonline/tnflag.jpg">James Butler digs into pork and political payoffs in the Tennessee state budget in a piece at ClarksvilleOnline.com headlined <a href=""><b>The true cost of pork spending</b></a>.<blockquote>Corruption also rears its ugly head in Tennessee, at least last year. Rep. Janis Sontany (D-Nashville), put in for $52,000 in earmarks to various organizations, she sits on the board for all of them. She also sent $10,000 to Seth Norman's drug court. He provided her with generous campaign donations. Rep. Mary Pruitt (D-Nashville) set aside $55,000 for a group she helped found, plus she's an ex-officio board member. Rep. Barbara Cooper asked for $61,000 for organizations that her own campaign claims she is a key member of.Rep. Joe Towns (D-Memphis) pushed for $10,000 for his college fraternity (which is even more suspect and worthless than the previous examples).</blockquote>I would disagree with Butler, however, when he lumps all per diem and travel expenses together as examples of waste and corruption - many expenses are legitimate things legislators ought to be reimbursed for.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/pork_and_payoffs.html</link>
         <guid>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/pork_and_payoffs.html</guid>
         <category>Tennessee Government News</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 07:46:56 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>What&apos;s Fair is Fair, Part 2</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In my immediate previous post we discussed the proposition that a "fair" tax code is one that does not redistribute income.</p>

<p>I think it is a definition most Americans would agree with - and there's new polling data that suggests as much.</p>

<p>The vast majority of the American people, <a href="http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2008/06/majority-of-americans-oppose-income.html"><strong>according to a recent Gallup poll</strong></a>, believe government should NOT redistribute income in order to "fix" the economy, but instead ought to focus on creating conditions for a healthy economy. Even the least well-off Americans overwhelmingly disfavor income redistribution:<blockquote>90 percent of Republicans, 85 percent of the Independents and 77 percent of the Democrats all believe the government should focus on overall economy versus redistributing wealth. When broken down by income levels the same sentiment is felt throughout them all, with 78 percent of those making less than $30,000 believing that the government should also focus on fixing the overall economic conditions and the jobs instead of trying to redistribute the wealth, followed by by 83 percent of those making $30,000 to $75,000 believing the same thing and 88 percent of those making $75,000 or more agree.</p>

<p>That answer differs when the "abstract" question of "should the wealthy pay more taxes" is asked showing that when given a choice of remedies, Americans favor that the government focus on fixing the problems and not taking from one group to give to another.</p>

<p>Half of Americans also feel the government does too much, not too little.</p>

<p>50 percent of Americans believe the government does too many things that should be left to individuals or businesses while 43 percent believe the government should do more.</p>

<p>The question was also broken down by political party lines showing that 72 percent of Republicans believe the government does too much while 24 percent think the government does not do enough, 47 percent of Independents believe the government oversteps while 44 percent believe they should do more and the Democrats are the one group that feel, by 58 percent to 36 percent, that the government does not do enough.</blockquote>Democrats are the party that always believes government does not do enough. The majority of the American people want a government that does less and stops redistributing income. A political party that made that its message would resonate with the broad majority of the American electorate.</p>

<p>Ben Cunningham calls the Gallup poll results <a href="http://taxingtennessee.blogspot.com/2008/06/yikesthis-is-encouraging.html"><b>"encouraging"</b></a>.</p>

<p>And while we're on the subject of polls, there was another poll out Tuesday, this one from Rasmussen, which found that 57 percent of likely voters believe voter approval should be required for all tax increases. 30 percent disagreed and 14 percent were unsure.</p>

<p>Rasmussen also found at that a majority of likely voters do not believe the U.S. government needs more tax revenue:<blockquote>In the latest survey, 47% of Democrats say new tax revenues are needed while only 17% of Republicans agree. A whopping 73% of GOP voters say more taxes are not needed <u>and 34% of Democrats agree with them</u>. Fifty-six percent (56%) of unaffiliated voters say the government does not need more tax revenue, but 32% disagree.</blockquote>Rasmussen notes that a majority of black voters believe government needs more tax revenue, but a majority of white voters do no. But there is no such divergence of views when it comes to income. Rasmussen says "voters across virtually all income groups oppose additional taxes."</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/whats_fair_is_fair_part_2.html</link>
         <guid>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/whats_fair_is_fair_part_2.html</guid>
         <category>Economy &amp; Business</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:42:47 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>What&apos;s Fair is Fair</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Back in April I wrote a post <a href="http://billhobbs.com/2008/04/an_academic_exercise.html"><strong>criticizing</strong></a> Vanderbilt University law professor Herwig J. Schlunk's 74-page paper advocating a state income tax. Dr. Schlunk emailed me a response yesterday, and I asked his permission to bring it to you verbatim. Click the "...read more" link below to see it, presented in its entirety, followed by one brief bit of additional commentary from me.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/whats_fair_is_fair.html</link>
         <guid>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/whats_fair_is_fair.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:50:34 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Fun Raiser</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Stacey Campfield does things <a href="http://lastcar.blogspot.com/2008/06/sir-goony-golf.html"><strong>differently</strong></a>. Of course, you already knew that about the first Tennessee state legislator to blog regularly from the statehouse.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/fun_raiser.html</link>
         <guid>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/fun_raiser.html</guid>
         <category>Campaign Season</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:48:00 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Guitars and Cars</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>News.com has a series of photos <a href="http://news.cnet.com/2300-13576_3-6242851-1.html?tag=nefd.pop"><strong>inside the Gibson custom guitar manufacturing facility</strong></a> - the one <i>not</i> open to the public for tours. The 18 photos and accompanying text are part of the site's <a href="http://news.cnet.com/Road-Trip-2008-Geek-Gestalt-explores-the-South/2009-13576_3-6240311.html"><strong>Road Trip 2008</strong></a> project. Also on the tour: GM's <a href="http://news.cnet.com/2300-13576_3-6241914-1.html?tag=st.nl"><strong>Corvette factory</strong></a> just up the road in Bowling Green, Ky.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/guitars_and_cars.html</link>
         <guid>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/guitars_and_cars.html</guid>
         <category>America the Beautiful</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:28:51 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Why Obama&apos;s Campaign Attacked John McCain&apos;s Military Service</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><object width="200"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/u07aBXU_GpA&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed align=right hspace=3 src="http://www.youtube.com/v/u07aBXU_GpA&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="200"></embed></object>Wesley Clark's disparaging remarks regarding John McCain's military service were no accidental slip of the tongue. Clark described McCain's heroic service as merely "riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down" and said that doesn't qualify McCain to be President. Clark's remarks came shortly after the release of <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/108373/McCain-vs-Obama-Commander-Chief.aspx"><b>new polling</b></a> from Gallup showing that far more Americans express greater confidence in McCain than in Obama to handle the responsibilities of commander in chief and send troops into combat.</p>

<p>Clark's not the first Obama surrogate to smear McCain's military record - it's also been done recently by West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller, Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, Obama advisor Rand Beers, and Obama supporter Ed Schultz (the latter called McCain a "warmonger" as he was warming up the crowd at an Obama campaign event, and Obama did not renounce the smear.)</p>

<p>The <i>Washington Examiner</i> <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner~y2008m7d1-Wesley-Clark-continues-Democrats-attacks-on-Mccains-heroic-service"><strong>explains</strong></a> what "riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down" really meant for McCain...</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/why_obamas_campaign_attacked_j.html</link>
         <guid>http://billhobbs.com/2008/07/why_obamas_campaign_attacked_j.html</guid>
         <category>Campaign Season</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:18:36 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
