![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Wild Stories | Main | New Orleans: An Essay » September 8, 2005Covering KatrinaAs promised, here are some more shots from New Orleans taken by my friend Grant Rampy, the White House correspondent for several television stations owned by the Tribune company (including WGN). The shots that he's in were taken by esteemed photojournalist Som Buddyelse. I don't have much cutline info for the shots, but will include what info I do know... All images are clickable for a larger version:
Comments
Here is a letter written by Governor Blanco, August 27, two days before the hurricane hit. Here is the link to the Office of the Governor. http://www.gov.state.la.us/Press_Release_detail.asp?id=976 And here is a segment of the letter: Here is a timeline of events complete with links to the proper documentation (DOD, White House, Office of the Governor.) This is in ref to Bob's comment on 2 Sep about not donating to the Red Cross. I have worked with the Red Cross with Hurricane Ivan and Katrina and have to say that a lot of these people would have nothing if it was not for the Red Cross. Granted it may not be much but it is a start for immediate needs. I tell people if you can not donate monetary please give your time if you can. So Bob, just remember that it could be you and it would be the Red Cross giving you a place to stay or funds to help pay for a place to stay. Food to eat and clothing. It has to come from somewhere. Maybe you have another organization that one can donate to. If so let us know. Thanks Posted by: at September 9, 2005 08:35 PMI'm sure those months-old "news stories & packages" on the sidebar tell nothing of her capabilities. I notice plenty of Bush-bashing there and a pattern of sending a letter to "A" through "B" and then claiming proudly to have sent a letter to "A". How stupid would Bush look if he had authorized billions of dollars to "improve wetlands on their coast" just in time for hurricane season? How does Blanco explain all the hoopla over millions for pelicans and nuttin' done for the levees? Posted by: Eric Holcombe at September 12, 2005 01:01 PMMountain Girl, Sorry. Not impressed. I've read the rest of the letter. The language you quote is nothing more nor less than boilerplate from the Stafford Act, cut and pasted as a justification for the declaration. It's how you ask for the Act to cut in and have the feds send money. It would have been the same for an upstream levee break endangering a few farmers, or for a tornado in Missouri, for that matter. And-- From the Stafford Act, paragraph 5170b: 3. Work and services to save lives and protect property What did she ask for? A. Debris removal. and nothing else! Everything else she asks for in the letter is monetary -- grants and/or loan guarantees, mostly the former. The letter is typical Louisiana politics, saying basically "send money and garbage collectors, we're fine otherwise." If not, why didn't she ask for something from items B through I? Not even "dissemination of public information"? Posted by: Ric Locke at September 13, 2005 10:05 PMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||