![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« CARR "among the most powerful tools not yet discovered by the Blogosphere" | Main | When Sickos Attack » August 27, 2005Lobbyist Watch
In related news, state Rep. Gary Moore, a Democrat from the Nashville suburb of Joelton, announced yesterday that he will give up his post as president of the Tennessee Professional Fire Fighters Association in October after receiving word that he was probably violating state law by serving in the post. The Nashville City Paper reports: Last legislative session, the General Assembly approved an ethics bill that made it unlawful for a legislator to be paid for consulting services that involve attempts to influence legislation or state contracts. Moore is also a Metro Nashville firefighter. He made his decision to retire after receiving Attorney General Paul Summers’ opinion that he was likely violating state law through his role.By resigning from the TPFFA, Moore is doing the right thing. I can't say the same about Odom. The Tennessee Optometrics Association has had issues before the legislature in recent years. Odom is a member of the House Health and Human Resources Committee and the Joint Tenncare Oversight Committee, two committees that oversee healthcare policy. Meanwhile, the pack of lobbyists in the Tennessee legislature are objecting loudly to a much-needed ethics reform that is already in place in 30 other states. It will be interesting to see where Sen. Person stands on that issue. I've said several times that whatever ethics reform proposals the lobbyists object to the loudest should be the first reforms that the people demand the legislature passes. Posted in Tennessee News
| Linked By |
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com Comments
Thanks for the latest, Bill. If anyone is interested in reading more about the Chattanooga meeting of the Citizen Advisory Group on Ethics, which focused on lobbyists and their activities, I have a half-finished post up on my blog and I will be adding more soon. My friend at work asked the best questions, though. 1) "What were lobbyists doing at a meeting on Ethics?" and 2) after I told her of John Lyell's comment that he didn't want [the public] in his business, and that's why he opposes disclosure, she said [as if to Lyell], "Why not? You're in ours!" Posted by: joe public at August 27, 2005 12:32 PMKeep this up, Bill. We've got to be able to identify the players and their associates if we're ever going to have a chance at figuring out what is really going on. Thanks, Posted by: Kay Brooks at August 27, 2005 12:59 PMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||