![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Some Advice for Harold Ford Jr. | Main | "We can handle the Pyrenees with seven guys." » July 14, 2005Bryant Leads Race For Senate NominationThe Ed Bryant for Senate campaign has released the results of a poll that shows Bryant leading in the race for the GOP nomination, and also shows that fellow Senate candidate Van Hilleary would lead in the race for the GOP nomination if he were running for governer instead of the U.S. Senate. Here is the Bryant campaign's press release... Bryant Has Double-Digit Lead In New U.S. Senate PollI remember that 1994 Senate race. I was working for The Tennessean, and was amused when the paper ran a story a couple weeks before election day saying the race between Sasser and Frist was "too close to call," based on a poll in which the gap between the two was within the margin of error - but there was a high percentage of voters still "undecided." I guess the paper thought that the undecideds would break along the same percentages, but I knew that was ridiculous. Sasser had been in office 18 years. The people who were saying they were "undecided" were not undecided about Sasser - they just hadn't fully decided yet to vote for Frist. As it turns out, Frist swamped Sasser as virtually all of those late undecideds voted for Frist, who beat Sasser by 13 points. Posted in 2006 TN Senate Race
| Linked By |
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com Comments
Rumor has it the NRCC has talked to Van Hilleary about leaving the U.S. Senate race to run against Bart Gordon in TN-06. These numbers may make his decision a little easier. Posted by: GOP Source at July 14, 2005 11:36 AMAt this point, polls are simply name recognition contests. I've never heard Bob Corker talk about abortion one way or another. Where is Ed Bryant getting this foolishness? Is he still in cahoots with the (anti) Christian Coalition. Looks like Ed may have some problems with truth and reality. Posted by: EvangelistofNews at July 14, 2005 03:56 PMEvangelist, I think I missed the part of the post that talks about Corker's position on abortion, but since you brought it up, here's where this "foolishness" comes from: “I view it [abortion] as a personal issue, not a government issue.” (Bob Corker, Republican National Coalition for Life, 1994 Candidate Questionnaire, 7/9/94) “The abortion issue provoked some differing responses. Corker, asked whether he believed ‘an unborn fetus is a human being’ declared, after some hesitation, ‘To me, at a certain stage, that is true .(But) I believe that is a decision that each individual needs to make for themselves.’” (Knoxville News-Sentinel, 7/28/94) Lately he's been saying in his speeches that he's pro-life. His website doesn't address the abortion issue. Posted by: JB at July 14, 2005 09:21 PMAbortion IS a personal issue--to the parents of the child. I am not in favor of it, but I am also not in favor of dishonesty, in which Ed Bryant seems to be engaging. One comment made eleven years ago doesn't constitute a record of supporting abortion, as Ed Bryant is contending. This, and the fact that his '02 campaign staff lied to me personally about Bryant's past and current involvement with the Pat Robertson cult suggests that Ed has a problem with the truth. If, given his past closeness with the Robertson cult, he will not disavow Robertson' inflammatory, hate-filled remarks after Spet. 11, we have to assume he agrees with them. And as a Christian, I cannot support anyone who abides such hatred. He needs to start being honest about both issues. Posted by: EvangelistofNews at July 15, 2005 02:09 PMEvangelist - you have repeatedly used my blog (hence, my bandwith, my server space and my money) to flog your anti-Bryant stance based on some asserted link between Bryant and the views of Pat Robertson. Okay, you've made your point. If you wish to make it further, start your own blog. From now on, when posting comments here, stick to the very specific topic of the original post, or I will delete your comments. Posted by: Bill Hobbs at July 15, 2005 02:54 PMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||