![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Governor's Race Update | Main | The Stingy List Makes the Wire » June 22, 2005Fighting BackHere's a new ad from the Republican National Committee:
It's nice to see the GOP fighting back against the onslaught of rude and sometimes bigoted attacks from a party that is desperate to regain power. Ironically, I learned of the ad via CapitolBUZZ, a new pro-Democrat blog that has been spamming me lately with emailed press releases touting their latest blog entries. The breathless blogpost announced: RNC Illegally Uses CSPAN Footage in New Attack AdYeah, wow. Nail the scofflaws! Send 'em to Gitmo! Er, wait. I forgot. There is a subset of copyright law called the "Fair Use Doctrine" which permits the use of video clips just exactly as the RNC used them in the ad. Wikipedia has a very good section on Fair Use Doctrine. Posted in Campaign Season
| Linked By |
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com Comments
Bill, I think that is the greatest GOP ad I've ever seen. Do you think they borrowed Taranto's subcolumn in Opinionjournal.com's "Best of The Web Today," called "Great Orators of The Democratic Party"? Thanks for posting this. David Posted by: David Flanagan at June 22, 2005 07:51 PMFrom the link you posted: umm... not listed: "for use in political advertisements" Seriously. Under which facet of Fair Use so you think this falls? You know that a Fair Use defense is an Affirmative Defense ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_defense ), right? Posted by: Kevin Newman at June 22, 2005 10:11 PMThe GOP played the wrong song in that clip This would have been better since all the Democrats seen to do is whine. http://www.sexylegsplaygirl.com/laverne/Crying.html Posted by: Paul at June 23, 2005 12:18 AMBill, Is it possible to download this ad to the computer? I'd love to save a copy of it to keep on the computer. One of the better political ads I've seen in awhile. Posted by: Yawn at June 23, 2005 12:36 AMKevin- I would think the section you cited re: "for purposes of illustration or comment" would apply to political situations without specifically using the word "politics." Political statements are made, and video clips back up the statements as a means of illustration. Posted by: Terry at June 23, 2005 09:12 AMBut the distiction is that they are using copyrighted material to comment on a third-party issue, not the copyrighted material itself. You can't use Mickey Mouse to comment on politics and claim that as Fair Use. You can use Mickey Mouse to comment on Disney. Posted by: Kevin Newman at June 23, 2005 11:07 AMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||