![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Podcasts from the Governor | Main | Spending Spree » June 4, 2005Bredesen's Lack of Interest in Legislative Ethics Goes Way Back
Now, of course, in the wake of the Tennessee Waltz arrests of four sitting lawmakers on federal corruption charges, Bredesen is trying to get in front of the ethics parade. Chavez says Bredesen's lack of interest in legislative issue two years ago is important now because Tennesseans are being asked to believe Bredesen's contention that he will address the corruption following the arrests of four lawmakers and one former legislator. Tennesseans also are being asked to trust Lt. Gov. John Wilder — who damned the FBI sting in a prayer on the Senate floor — and House Speaker Jimmy Naifeh — spouse to a high-paid lobbyist. They will appoint members to a committee that will recommend new ethics laws to Bredesen. He might call a special session.And so, a governor with zero interest in leading the legislature to ethics reform now will work with the ethically blind leaders of the House and Senate to craft ethics reform. Perfect. You want to make us believe you really mean it, Phil? Put Frank Buck in charge of that committee. And let him pick all the members you appoint. In related Tennessee Waltz developments, today's Tennessean has an editorial calling on the three indicted lawmakers who remain in office - Sen. Ward Crutchfield, D-Chattanooga, Sen. Kathryn Bowers, D-Memphis, and Rep. Chris Newton, R-Cleveland, - to resign. The paper also reports that "Cash campaign contributions make some queasy after sting." Well, yeah. The problem is, the fact that legislators could accept large cash gifts from lobbyists didn't make very many lawmakers, legislative leaders or the governor queasy before the sting. Posted in Tennessee Waltz
| Linked By |
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com Comments
Those of us who fought the sdmca bill a few years ago remember Frank Buck well from one of the committees that he was on. Out of all the legislators on the two or three committees that we dealt with, he was the one who asked all the hard questions. He also pointed out that there were a lot of us in the audience who didn't seem to think this was a good idea, and he actually asked the MPAA shill why that was. In short, he rained on the MPAA's parade badly. After all the slimy people we dealt with (and, not surprisingly, I saw Sen. Person was supporting the TW "victims", but I digress), Frank Buck really stood out as a legislator who was doing his job and doing it well. He impressed us all. It'll be sad if he leaves the legislature. Posted by: Michael Chaney at June 4, 2005 09:25 AMDoes a special session provide for the opportunity to change the leadership? ie, if the senate goes into session, can we begin the session by removing from the speaker's role the "meandering octogenarian with a penchant for saying head-poundingly ridiculous things"? (Thanks to Roger A at www.nashvillescene.com for that vivid description.) Posted by: Bob K at June 4, 2005 01:26 PMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||