![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Get an iPod for $1 | Main | Nanny State Update » February 15, 2005Bredesen for President? Not Without a Cogent Plan...Larry Daughtrey, Tennessean columnist, had a column Sunday looking at why Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen keeps being mentioned as a possible presidential candidate. I rarely say this about a Daughtrey column, but this time you really should read the whole thing. It's fairly good, though Daughtrey is clearly trying hard to boost Bredesen's stock. Bredesen has shrugged off talk of presidential ambitions. But the context and content of two recent speeches, little reported in Tennessee, suggests that this is more than a fleeting fancy. The first was in Atlanta last month, to a gathering of Southern Democratic Party leaders pondering the choice of a new chairman. ''The next time, we want a 50-state platform, we want a 50-state party, and we want a 50-state campaign,'' Bredesen said flatly.Well, governor, then you should join the Republican party. The second speech was last week to a think-tank organization in North Carolina. In it, Bredesen laid out a cerebral, well-reasoned indictment of Medicaid, which goes by the name of TennCare here. "At budget time, it has become the gorilla that comes to the table and eats and drinks what it wants, and then education and public safety and state employees get to fight over what is left." His proposal for reform: Everyone pays something, pay for important things first, and pay only for what works rather than a catch-all program that invests billions in cold medicines and antacids.Share the burden, pay only for stuff that works, and prioritize spending - why that's a reform "proposal" that any construction worker , retail clerk in Montgomery or just-married couple in Pensacola could have come up with. The devil, of course, is in the details. More on that in a bit. In a speech on health care to eggheads, he managed to work in two references to "deep and personal religious values" and a lengthy passage about his love for hunting since an early age. Taken together, the speeches can be taken as the beginnings of an intellectual foundation for a presidential campaign.Daughtrey is working overtime when he calls the speeches "the beginnings of an intellectual foundation for a presidential campaign." It doesn't take an intellectual to know that the problem with TennCare is that it spends too much money. It does take a smart person to figure how to reform it, given the complexities of the program and the geometric complexity of healthcare economics. Daughtrey contines: The Medicaid problem is afflicting every state and straining budgets in the way TennCare has here. The National Governors Association is struggling to find a coordinated response to the problem, and Bredesen has been the first to step forward with a cogent strategy that goes beyond temporary adjustments.Yes. Good. But Bredesen has no cogent strategy for reforming TennCare - at least none that he has proffered publicaly. He has correctly identified the problem, but has not offered anything remotely approaching a solution. If Bredesen had a cogent reform plan, he could implement it tomorrow by signing an executive order. Two executive orders, actually. The first would pull the plug on TennCare, which was created by executive order in 1994 by then-Gov. Ned McWherter. A program created by executive order can be canceled by executive order. With a second executive order, Bredesen could replace TennCare with whatever cogent new state healthcare program Daughtrey is convinced Bredesen has up his sleeve. Except ... Bredesen doesn't have a cogent plan, he has merely a cogent analysis of the problem. If he has a cogent plan, he certainly hasn't had the courage to act on it. That's why for the past few months Bredesen has been reduced to begging a federal judge and groveling before a self-appointed group of "public interest" attorneys for permission to make changes to a dying program. Gov. Phil Bredesen is a wealthy former healthcare business exect who the people of Tennessee elected primarily to fix TennCare. More than halfway into his first term, he hasn't done it. Failure like that is a poor foundation for a presidential run. Posted in Bredesen Watch
| Linked By |
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com Comments
Excellent coverage. Keep it up! Posted by: Marvin at February 15, 2005 03:03 PMWow. If this isn't a prime example of what "could" be getting published to inform the citizenry in traditional media, but isn't, I don't know what is. This is the kind of writing that will kill off other news providers if and when someone does get your... I mean, a, business plan together to support full-on reporting/analysis/opinion of the sort this displays. I think I can see the future a bit more clearly now. Posted by: Mark at February 15, 2005 06:45 PMIf Andrea Conte becomes Andrea Conte Bredesen, you know he's running. Posted by: Tim Morgan at February 15, 2005 09:20 PMMaybe Bredesen is postponing TennCare executive orders until he's reelected. Thereupon he issues the orders, declares success, and runs for President. I don't condone this, but isn't it how the game is played? Is Bredesen considering (or threatening) a switch in party affiliation. "...I have no desire to belong to a party that represents the hopes and aspirations of non-profit public interest organizations in Washington. I dream about belonging to a party that speaks to the aspirations of construction workers in Nashville and retail clerks in Montgomery and just-married couples in Pensacola." My impression is that legislators are more likely than executives to switch parties, but maybe Bredesen has his reasons? Just a thought. Posted by: gs at February 15, 2005 10:07 PMBredesen's sadistic approach to reforming Tenncare, which included cutting over 30,000 people with 'severe and persistent mental illness' off of any and all health coverage, makes him a terrible choice for any office with any political party. Posted by: Martin at April 29, 2005 10:14 AMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||