About | Portfolio | Backup | Archives | PayPal Tip Jar | Amazon Tip Jar | Shop@Amazon
Advertising


Search BillHobbs.com
Stats, Etc.


TTLB Ecosystem Stats
Powered by FeedBurner


« Tsunami: Death Toll Hits 100,000 | Main | Tsunami Blogging »

December 30, 2004

One Paper Gets Blogging

The Riverside Press Entreprise totally gets what blogs are doing to mainstream journalism. You'll need to register with their site to read it (unless you have already registered with a the website of sister paper such as the Dallas Morning News) but it is worth the hassle.

David beat Goliath repeatedly in 2004, as a ragtag crowd of commentators on political Weblogs, most of them unpaid, hastened the retirement of a media icon and derailed a $300 million presidential campaign. Political bloggers shoved Dan Rather toward the door and brought John Kerry's political biography back to Earth. Not bad for a bunch of amateurs.

Yet 2004 was no fluke. Blogs are neither a fad, nor a creation of the vast, right-wing conspiracy. They're a cyberspace version of the 18th-century pamphleteers who defied the British crown and championed American independence - an online truth squad spanning the political spectrum that revels in revealing inaccurate reporting or misleading arguments. And bloggers will continue to dislodge entrenched elites so long as mainstream journalism rebukes rather than embraces them.

Blogs react to events as they occur. They can incorporate in postings background materials that are too detailed for a newspaper story or a TV broadcast. And the rough code of ethics that guides the most prominent political bloggers - their willingness to answer criticism and confess mistakes in real time so that they can uphold their reputation - could undermine the credibility of "old media" institutions that aren't comfortable saying, "We goofed."

... It's this "truth squad" aspect to blogging - a burning desire to separate facts from spin - that should give big media the willies. Bloggers don't pretend to be "fair and balanced." Many are partisan cheerleaders, nothing more.

But bloggers have reputations. As the "Instapundit," University of Tennessee law professor Glenn Reynolds, said of Rathergate: "For journalists of (Rather's) generation, admitting an error means admitting that you've violated people's trust. For bloggers, admitting an error means you've missed something, and now you're going to set it straight."

...Blogs can keep the mainstream media honest, by exposing stories driven by partisan agendas rather than the pursuit of truth.

Exactly right.

The Press Enterprise must have read Hugh Hewitt's new book, Blog : Understanding the Information Reformation That's Changing Your World , which I'm urging all of my readers to also purchase and read. Five of my readers already have ordered a copy. Those five will be among the few who join the blog revolution that is undermining the old media monopoly and giving individuals a voice in the marketplace of ideas.

Posted in Blogging & Journalism | Linked By |
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com
Comments

The News & Record in Greensboro, NC is also on to this, as I'm sure you're also aware. John Robinson is showing a great deal of courage working with the city's burgeoning number of bloggers and his staff trying to figure out how to adapt.

I remember when you spoke with Terry and Catherine, then reported on the "audible gasps." I've been fortunate enough since then to have Leonard Witt speak in Atlanta and Ed Cone in Greensboro, and they got the exact same reactions from their audiences.

This whole thing is fascinating to be living through and watching. Oh, and the Powerline guys just shredded the Star-Tribune. One more chunk of armor gone.

Thanks for all your work again this year. I look forward to more of it in the new year.

Posted by: Mark at December 30, 2004 02:26 PM

Nonsense. As others have pointed out, Bloggers generally are reactionary, responding and commenting on real news reported by the professionals.

It's the big media corporations that provide remote reporting, expert commentary, and notable interviews (and leaks). No senator with any sense would leak a fact to a blogger, they'd leak it to the Washington Post.


Blogging is one facet of today's media; any claims that it represents some sort of new, bold establishment of journalism is silly.

Posted by: sherman at December 30, 2004 02:26 PM

Sherman - just one question...

What part of mainstream media do you belong to?

While it is true that "blogging is one facet of today's media", you are way off base in your assessment that "Bloggers generally are reactionary, responding and commenting on real news reported by the professionals".

Perhaps if the people in the media were professional, than perhaps you might be closer to the truth. But given that journalists admit to and are taught to be activists and to slant stories to their beliefs, professional journalist is rapidly becoming an oxymoron.

I've got no problem with newspapers printing opinion pieces -- just put it on the editorial page and not in the "new". Does anyone remember news being "who, what, where, and when", and the why and the analysis of what it meant was left to me, the reader?

Until journalism returns to being a "professional" field, the Bloggers good and bad are the same as the mainstream media.

Posted by: Charlie at December 31, 2004 10:04 PM
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!









Remember personal info?






Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




back to top
Advertising

blog advertising is good for you
Video Ad Slot
To run your video ad here, contact me at bill-at-billhobbs.com
Archives
Blogroll