About | Portfolio | Backup | Archives | PayPal Tip Jar | Amazon Tip Jar | Shop@Amazon
Advertising


Search BillHobbs.com
Stats, Etc.


TTLB Ecosystem Stats
Powered by FeedBurner


« Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes | Main | ACORN's Branches »

October 26, 2004

Voter Fraud Roundup

voterfraudlogo.GIFHere's a round-up of several stories about voter fraud (and related issues such as voter intimidation, etc...), that I've recieved via readers in recent days. Headlines only for some of them.

Media Coverage:
A tally of election semi-dirty tricks - Philadelphia Daily News, 10/19
Voter fraud at record levels - Stockton (Calif.) Record, 10/18
Calif justices skirt voter privacy issue until after election - AP, 10/18
Voter fraud case traced to Defiance County registrations volunteer; 124 registrations falsified, allegedly for crack cocaine - Toledo Blade, 10/19
Bogus voter registration forms pop up - Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 10/20:

Fulton County elections officials suspect they received as many as 3,000 bogus voter registration applications collected illegally in exchange for money. The applications were submitted to the Georgia secretary of state's office in September by Unity '04, a national group working in Atlanta with civil rights leader the Rev. Joseph Lowery to register African-American voters.
Thanks readers Michael C. and Joe K. for sending the link to that one.
Election Fraud Cases Under Review - WBNS-TV, Columbus, Ohio, reports that "Hundreds of cases of suspected election fraud are under review in Franklin County." Groups suspected of submitting faked registrations include Columbus Urban League and ACORN. Among the registered: Nuradin Abdi, a native of Somalia and non-citizen recently charged with plotting to blow up a Columbus mall. In other words, a suspected terrorist.
Early voting brings cries of bullying - South Florida Sun-Sentinel, 10/23
Dual Voter List Cited in Carolina - Charlotte Observer, 10/24 - the report says that as many as 60,000 people may be registered to vote in both North and South Carolina, according to an investigation by The Charlotte Observer and WCNC-TV. 60,000 people. The story also details problems with illegal immigrants voting, and notes that ACORN is under investigation by officials in North Carolina for apparently submitting fake voter registration cards.

There ought to be a federal criminal investigation of ACORN under the RICO statute, and Congress ought to launch a parallel probe.

A Mini-Watergate - Accuracy In Media, 10/25. A bit off topic, but Nader's forces are accusing the Kerry campaign of dirty tricks.

Thousands of new-voter cards in Ohio undeliverable - Cincinnati Enquirer, 10/20. The paper reports that thousands of cards mailed by county election boards to newly registered voters throughout Ohio are being returned because the people can't be found. Ohio Republican Party Chairman Robert Bennett says this is a result of statewide registration fraud conducted by independent groups that support Democratic candidates. [Via PowerLine]

Bloggage:
Sean Hackbarth notes that Kerry-backers are helping convicts vote in Wisconsin, and the state isn't doing much to double-check their eligibility. He has a follow-up here. And yet more from Sean Hackbarth: Project Vote, which is being investigated by the Racine County (Wisconsin) district attorney for voter registration fraud, apparently hired two convicted felons to register voters. That's illegal.
Charles Rich notes the NAACP's crack-for-voter registrations scandal.
Jeff Quinton reports on a group trying to trick residents in six of South Carolina's poorest counties into voting by promising them flu shots, though it can't deliver on the promise. Disgusting.
Scary Kerry has posted a blog article on vote paring/vote swapping in the 2004 election, here, and also updated his guide to combating voter fraud from a few weeks ago.

Good News:
Reader Steve N. sent the link to this AP story noting that the Florida Supreme Court may have learned its lesson from four years ago and given up trying to alter election law to suit the Democrats.

People who cast a provisional ballot at the wrong precinct aren't entitled to have their votes counted, the state Supreme Court unanimously ruled Monday, rejecting an argument by labor unions that the rule wrongly disenfranchises voters. The court said that the law clearly states that provisional ballots must be counted only if the person was entitled to vote "at the precinct," and that the constitution gives the Legislature the authority to dictate voting rules.
Four years ago, Florida election law clearly stated that a ballot with a "chad" that was not completely pushed through and removed was not a validly cast vote, but that didn't stop the Florida Supreme Court from trying to county such non-votes as votes in three heavily Democratic counties to try to boost Al Gore over the top. Thankfully, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that counting three counties' votes under different standards than the rest of Florida's counties violated the equal-protection clause.

CORRECTIONS:

Your post at http://billhobbs.com/hobbsonline/004758.html incorrectly states: "Meanwhile, vote already cast on absentee ballots that listed Nader will be tossed out. Those votes will not count and those voters will not have sufficient time to receive, complete, and return a new ballot." Please refer to the news release from the Federal Voting Assistance Program which states "Any votes for Mr. Nader will be treated as write-in votes. Votes for all other candidates will be tallied as usual - no further action from voters is required."

David Calder, Major, USAF
Hill Air Force Base Voting Assistance Officer

Noted. And thanks for reading.

If you spot a news story about suspected voter fraud in your part of the country, please send me the link and a brief summary to voterfraud-at-gmail.com.

Posted in Voter Fraud | Linked By |
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com
Comments

VOTER FRAUD ALERT!

A secret document obtained from inside Bush campaign headquarters in Florida suggests a plan - possibly in violation of US law - to disrupt voting in the state's African-American voting districts, a BBC Newsnight investigation reveals.
Election supervisor Ion Sancho believes some voters are being intimidated

Two e-mails, prepared for the executive director of the Bush campaign in Florida and the campaign's national research director in Washington DC, contain a 15-page so-called "caging list".

It lists 1,886 names and addresses of voters in predominantly black and traditionally Democrat areas of Jacksonville, Florida.

An elections supervisor in Tallahassee, when shown the list, told Newsnight: "The only possible reason why they would keep such a thing is to challenge voters on election day." [...]

In Jacksonville, to determine if Republicans were using the lists or other means of intimidating voters, we filmed a private detective filming every "early voter" - the majority of whom are black - from behind a vehicle with blacked-out windows.

The private detective claimed not to know who was paying for his all-day services.

On the scene, Democratic Congresswoman Corinne Brown said the surveillance operation was part of a campaign of intimidation tactics used by the Republican Party to intimate and scare off African American voters, almost all of whom are registered Democrats

Posted by: TomJ at October 26, 2004 08:36 PM

Filming polling places should only scare off people who are voting illegally. And the GOP has every right to have a list of people it suspects are registered illegally, in order to challenge them if and when they try to vote. The Democrats should have a similar list.

Posted by: Bill at October 26, 2004 10:06 PM

How is it "intimidating" to a legal voter to be filmed at the polls? If it is, indeed, "intimidating," then I guess the news media will not be rolling tape at any polling places on Nov. 2.

Get a grip, TomJ - rolling tape at a polling place isn't "intimidation". It's videotaping.

Posted by: Bill at October 26, 2004 10:08 PM

I didn't read this in paper I saw it with my own eyes: At a nursing home the social director "registered" the residents and then filled in thier absentee ballots for them..These residents can't remember who is running, and if you told them they were voting for Roosevelt they would agree. They don't even KNOW who they are...let alone who the candidates are.

Then when I was voting at the election headquarters...there were van loads of mentally retarded people being brought in from the local day care center where they are kept each day...all registered and there to vote.

These are people that are at best on second grade level and have been brought in to VoTE.

So my question is: are there no rules at all regarding who can vote? Isn't there any rule in election process that addresses mental awareness?

Is it legal for someone to register these people all at one address and then to fill in the ballots for them?

Posted by: cora Brantley at October 27, 2004 09:28 AM

It's incredibly illegal for someone to register someone else, and it's INCREDIBLY INCREDIBLY illegal for them to fill in their ballot.

It even illegal for someone to handle someone else's absentee ballot unless they are a member of that person's direct family, are a postal worker delivering that ballot after it was being returned to the election office via mail, or are *specifically requested and allowed* by that person due to the voter's physical incapacity to return the ballot themselves.

In the case of the nursing home social director, they are blatantly breaking the law, and I believe are guilty of a felony. I would personally love to watch them get arrested for the crap they're pulling, no matter which side they're on.

Posted by: Matt at October 27, 2004 01:43 PM

Most people believe our electoral process is in serious trouble. Allegations of voter fraud and voter disenfranchisment dominate the public debate. I believe something needs to be done. Here are six possible steps toward reforming the process and getting us back on track.

First, criminalize false allegations of voting abuse. Some would say this would be a violation of free speech rights. I submit it is in line with the proviso that free speech doesn't allow you to stand up in a crowded theater and scream "FIRE." Unfounded accusations undermine the confidence of our citizens in a process that requires their confidence. Therefore it ought to be illegal to make allegations without supporting evidence.

Second, when someone is caught engaging in voting fraud (voting twice, voting in a state other than their state of residence, selling their vote or voting because of some form of a bribe) the offending person needs to pay a substantial fine and lose time either in jail or in doing community service. The law provides for a $10,000 fine and up to 3 years imprisonment and it needs to be enforced!

Third, Congress needs to pass a law so that crimes committed for the purpose of interfering with the democratic process are treated more severely than otherwise. A drunken teenager slashing a tire on a Friday night is a crime against an individual. When Radical Activists slash the tires of 30 vehicles to prevent a rival party from getting out the vote it is the democratic process that is vandelized. (This happened today in Wisconsin) Theft, bribery, intimidation, vandalization etc deserve much harsher penalties when used to undermine the democratic process.

Forth, we need to standardize the voting machinery. Period. It is just too important to leave it up to county officials. The equipment procurment needs to be Federalized.

Fifth, there needs to be a CLEAR, FAIR and STANDARDIZED policy regarding:
1. Absentee ballots
2. Provisional ballots
3. Early Ballots.
The criteria for using each of these needs to be clearly spelled out in a bipartisian way long before the election.

Finally, Congress needs to make a law that any party official convicted of engaging in illegal activity on behalf of their party (or of knowing about such activity and doing nothing about it) will serve a mandatory 5 year prison term. (No time off for good behavior, no parole, no deals, no exceptions!)

Our entire system of government rests on the voting process. It is time our national law makers act to protect that process. The work needs to begin right now.

Posted by: Mark Reed at November 2, 2004 05:47 PM

I am registered in two states. Texas and California. I moved and as far as I know there is no way of Un-registering that I know of. Maybe people moving around would account for some of the numbers not adding up.

Posted by: Albert at November 6, 2004 07:29 PM
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!









Remember personal info?






Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




back to top
Advertising

Video
Palin Acceptance Speech

McCain Acceptance Speech

I Also Blog At...
button-fcs-blog.gif
Archives
Blogroll