![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« AP Reports on Democrats' Derogatory Poster | Main | This Just In » October 14, 2004Offensive Poster Update
As I noted yesterday, the Tennessee Democratic Party is pushing the spin that the fliers were only available for a few minutes, and then thrown away by volunteers in the campaign office of incumbent state Rep. Craig Fitzhugh, but not before one person grabbed one and took it to the local paper. Implication: the fliers were planted by Republicans for the express purpose of smearing the Democrats. Problem: Evidence is mounting that the fliers were available for a period of two weeks, not just a few minutes. Michelle Malkin sheds light on it. I spoke with William Klutcs, the editor of the local paper, the Lauderdale Enterprise, which published a short feature on the flier. He said he has been hearing complaints about the poster for the past two weeks.Who would people be complaining for two weeks if only one person got a copy of the flier? Also today, blogger and Tennessee legislative aide Matt White has some more info about the Democratic legislator at the center of the controversy - and email contact info for four more people who you might want to nicely express your outrage too. Blogger Susan B. has thoughts of a more personal nature regarding the flier. Chances are, I will be unable to cover the 1 p.m. news conference. I'd love to deputize a reader to go and file a report... UPDATE: I did manage to drop by the press conference. Most of the speakers represented the disability community and spoke of how awful the flier was. One such speaker called for it to be "removed from the public domain" and wondered aloud why the flier spread so fast via the Internet. Well, lessee. Someone showed the flier to Rep. Fitzhugh's campaign opponent. He issued a statement, via email and posted it and an image of the flier on a website. I read it. I blogged it, and included an image of the flier. So did at least one other political website who were just as appalled by the flier as I was. Somehow, Matt Drudge saw it, and posted it on The Drudge Report. That's how. Thanks to the Internet, what in the past would have been only a local story in that small town instead went global - and faster than the traditional media, which even today is still only following up what was already reported and commented on widely in the blogosphere. As for the request for the flier to be "removed from the public domain," it isn't going to happen. The image of the flier is now integral to the journalistic coverage of the flier, including on news sites and on commentary/political analysis sites like this one. Rep. Fitzhugh spoke briefly, called the flier a "cheap political trick" and a "cruel hoax," and stated neither he nor his campaign staff had anything to do with it. I later overheard him telling reporters the same thing he told them yesterday - the fliers were brought into the office and left on the table, volunteers threw them away, and soon after that a man came in and got one from the trash and said he was taking it to the newspaper. I don't know what evidence he provided to back up that claim. So, here is what we know: Dahl was invited to the press conference but was not there because of a conflicting medical appointment. It's better he was not there. Dahl should be applauded for bringing the shameful flier to public scrutiny via his email and website press release, but if he had been at the press conference, I feel certain the media - without any evidence - would have questioned him based on the innuendo of the Tennessee Democratic Party and Rep. Fitzhugh, demanding he prove his campaign had not produced the flier. My previous coverage on this story: Posted in Campaign Season
| Linked By |
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com Comments
Frankly, the response by the Democrats should have been anticipated. In this case, "investigative" or "gotcha" journalism is the only way responsibility could have been assigned without counter-accusations. Perhaps the blogosphere and instant communications made the chance for an undercover investigation (a simple pick-up of the poster with a camera) unavailable. Posted by: Brian O. at October 14, 2004 07:46 AMPerpetuating a story like this is almost as bad as pulling off such a juvenile trick in the first place. On top of that, it's not even a good juvenile trick. A two-week period is plenty long enough to call in a news crew with cameras, to do a good job of exposing the "goings on". This is a campaign swoop-and-squat. Posted by: SemiPundit at October 14, 2004 09:33 AMBy perpetuating, I suppose you mean bringing it to the public's attention, so as to emphasize what contempt the left has for even a modicum of civility. Posted by: JDG at October 14, 2004 09:37 AMWhile perpetuating the story may not suit your purposes, finding out the truth would be beneficial to all. You are correct that the 2 weeks was wasted and we will likely not know the truth. Posted by: Brian O. at October 14, 2004 09:46 AMSemi I suppose you'd say the same thing if this were a Republican flier, right? When your own side gets caught, it's much-ado-about-nothing. Otherwise it's a big expose of the opponents proclivities for crassness and I'll-say-anything-to-win-mentality. Riiiigghht. Posted by: jane m at October 14, 2004 09:52 AMI'm saying that this is the same kind of antics that have gone on since politics began (ancient Rome, perhaps?). No matter which side does it, it should be done with more creativity and finesse. If they are going to stoop to such tactics, they should at least do a good job of it. The blatancy of the thing automatically kicks in the backfire factor. I'm also not surprised to see Michelle Malkin chiming in. She must be between gigs. Posted by: SemiPundit at October 14, 2004 10:33 AMSemi-human, er, uh, pundit; The local paper in the small town where the poster was distributed did a story on it after the editor heard complaints from people for 2 weeks. From there, it bubbled up through the blogosphere to the mainstream media. The Dems' claim that the flier was a GOP trick ring hollow and the claim that it was available for only a few minutes is most likely a lie. Posted by: Bill Hobbs at October 14, 2004 11:12 AMThe blatancy of the thing automatically kicks in the backfire factor. Um, sure, whatever. You do remember that the left has made a habit out of comparing Bush to Hitler, don't you? And that they've paid little or no price for doing something so tasteless and ignorant? This is just more of the same. And the "oh, this is just a Republican dirty trick" line has worn out this year. SwiftVets -- Rove made them do it. Rather's fakes -- Rove planted them. Disgusting posters -- obviously a Republican trick. It's like Democrats simply will not accept their own mistakes, and feel compelled to blame everything on the Other. That's not a healthy impulse. Posted by: Robert Crawford at October 14, 2004 12:10 PMIt's not *like* they Democrats will not accept their own mistakes. They simply *can't* do it. Liberals think they are always right no matter what they do or say. Posted by: Jinx McHue at October 14, 2004 02:38 PMRep. Fitzhugh was on NewsTalk 99.1's Hallerin Hilton Hill Show this morning (Knoxville; 7:15am). Predictably, 100% deniability; however, his official story went like this: Within 5 minutes, there were 2-3 phone calls (local) to support him (from Republican friends). Well, it isn't very hard to make sure you have some friends call in support. It also doesn't take a rocket scientist to look at his statements and conclude that he most likely knew about it + is willing to do whatever it takes to salvage his campaign. Predictably, he blamed most of it on teamGOP. Of course, Hallerin was a gracious host and believed him. Whether he did it or not, I just have an extremely difficult time believing that he would not have taken a political football such as this flier and run with it immediately....unless, of course, he was lying. I hate election years. Posted by: Toni at October 14, 2004 07:16 PMI don't live in Fitzhugh's district, but I voted early in NE Tennessee today and against the Democrat I supported 2 years ago because I was so outraged by this poster. I do hope my representative will switch to running as an Independent because he has done a good job for our district. I just can't vote for anyone in a party that would stoop this low. Posted by: MyssiAnn at October 14, 2004 07:54 PMWhile living in a different city than my current one, about 20 years ago...during the height of the "Nuclear Freeze" campaign, a poster appeared which advertized the visit of one "Oleg Vishenko", Soviet Information minister, to explain how Korean Air 007 was a "Spy Flight". (And thus justified to shoot it down..) The peace groups DENIED they had anything to do with it, after it went public. Their sympathizers in the local media did everything to back that assertion. Trouble was, IT WAS TRUE! The poster had been produced for "internal" distribution among the "peace groups" in the area. Someone got it to a copy machine, and it GOT OUT... Darn, these things happen! Posted by: Joe Papf at October 14, 2004 08:35 PMFollowup to Tom's comment. Thursday's Mike Fleming show (WREC AM600; Memphis) also had an interview with Fitzhugh. I was working and missed it. Fleming was also being pretty sympathetic, chastising Republicans for being so quick to blame him when they didn't know the "whole" story. Fleming claimed that Fitzhugh had a lot of charity associations with mental retardation groups and that his wife was a special needs teacher. Can't verify if that's true. Posted by: mike hollihan at October 14, 2004 08:50 PM"The fliers were removed, taken outside and put in a public trash can at the curb." Why in the world would you take the fliers and dump them in an outside trash can? Why go through all the trouble of going outside to trash them? Do they take their trash a peice at a time outside to dispose of of it? Didn't they have trash cans inside? Why blame it on the elderly? They may be old but there're not stupid. Something just is not right with that part of Fitzhugh's story. I think that because mainstream opponets of President Bush have been so blinded by hate and irresponible with their characterizations and language that many of the more impressionable part of that group have taken the cue and believe that any agitprop or behavior is okay. These things will continue to occur until the leadership of the Democratic party starts to take some responibility and changes their discourse and admonishing their nutjobs instead of lying or blaming it on the victim or both. Posted by: Harry in Atlanta at October 15, 2004 12:39 AMThat should read "they're not stupid" not "there're not stupid" I am on pain medication from experiencing a bout of pneumonia. Posted by: Harry in Atlanta at October 15, 2004 12:43 AMWhen I was young, I worked a great deal with retarded children. This was before it became popular to refer to them as "special" or "special needs" children. We noticed that there were always persons who would make fun of these kids, often to the point of making them cry. Always, when confronted with their offense, they claimed we and the children "simply did not understand the joke," or that we did not realize they were talking about someone/something else. People who are willing to attack children as part of their politics as here, or with Sophia Parlock (here http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/040916/480/wvrs10309162250), are not to be trusted with running any part of this government. Posted by: Mike at October 15, 2004 01:48 PMI still think it bears remembering that this type of allusion to foes of the Democratic party is not new. Al Gore, Maureen Dowd and others have coined and used the term "extra-chromosome conservatives" for years. Maureen Dowd apparently loves the way it rolls off her tongue and has used it frequently in her writings. And, these mordant musings are preserved in the media. Did those nasty conservative types make them say it and make Dowd say it over and over and over again? BGF Posted by: BGF at October 22, 2004 06:58 AMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||