![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« How Augusta Beat The Times (With Blogs!) | Main | Oil! » April 8, 2004Bredesen Pushes Tax Increase on BusinessExclusive Indeed, it ought to be easy for the governor to keep that promise, as the state is piling up record revenue and a large surplus that could top $200 million this fiscal year. And Bredesen promised no tax increases in the fourth paragraph of his State of the State address nine weeks ago, saying, "The new budget I am submitting to you is - once again - balanced. And - once again - it requires no new taxes." Yet Bredesen is backing House Bill 3529 and Senate Bill 3427 legislation that will, indeed, increase state taxes on business by $75 million. Bredesen's Department of Revenue is lobbying for it. His Assistant Commissioner of Revenue Reagan Farr, a political appointee, testified on behalf of the legislation before the House Finance Committee. And the bill is included in the 3-inch-thick binder in which the Bredesen administration outlined its entire legislative agenda for 2004. "This is an administration bill," says House Majority Leader Kim McMillan, a Clarksville Democrat. Here's how the tax increase, which will hit all businesses that pay the state's excise tax, will work: Years ago, Tennessee "coupled" its depreciation schedules to the federal depreciation schedules if the federal government changes its depreciation schedules, Tennessee's automatically adjust to mirror them. President Bush's last two tax relief packages contained accelerated depreciation provisions that encouraged businesses to make capital investments, in order to spur economic growth and it's working. Capital investment by business is rising. The tax-increase legislation Bredesen is pushing would "decouple" Tennessee's depreciation schedules from the federal Tennessee's would revert to the schedules in place before President Bush passed his first tax cut. The net effect of this bill is that small businesses in Tennessee will not get the benefit of accelerated depreciation if this bill passes. Furthermore, this is a permanent decoupling so if the federal depreciation schedules are accelerated again, Tennessee businesses won't see it on their state taxes. The required "fiscal note" that accompanies the legislation estimates that this will increase state revenues $75 million this year. Rep. Gene Davidson, a Robertson County Democrat who fell out of favor with powerful House Speaker Jimmy Naifeh for not supporting Naifeh's unconstitutional income tax plan two years ago, said in a Finance Committee hearing Tuesday that the Department of Revenue won't call this is a tax increase but that's exactly what it is. Davidson did manage to get Farr to concede that Tennessee businesses will pay more tax to Tennessee if the bill passes, but Farr refused to call it a tax increase. The legislation also means businesses that are filing quarterly estimates will have to adjust their tax returns upwards for the remainder of the year because their estimates for the first two quarters of the year are based on having accelerated depreciation. Rep. Tim Garrett of the Nashville suburb of Goodlettsville - another anti-income tax Democrat commented in the same hearing that "The Federal Government is trying to spur investment and the State of Tennessee is trying to unspur it." Bredesen isn't the only Tennessee politician breaking a promise to balance the FY 2004-05 budget without raising taxes. Naifeh promised now new taxes in a speech on the floor of the House on March 24, where he said: "We're gonna' balance this budget. We're gonna' do it with no new taxes."The House Democratic Caucus issued a statement April 1 promising "fiscally sound budget that includes no new taxes." Perhaps it was an April Fool's joke. Or maybe they were all just lying to you. Posted in Tennessee Budget & Tax Policy
| Linked By |
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com Comments
Not really news. Sundquist (Republican) proposed the same thing in 2002. Posted by: skb at April 8, 2004 12:05 PMLove you site and opinions, but I am going to have to disagree on this one. All states couple their taxes with the federal only up to a certain extent. Some don't at all. For instance, I don't know of any state that is giving a state child credit indexed to the federal child credit. Which has resulted in many working families federal taxes falling below levels of their state taxes. Even though the state has not decreased taxes in lock step with the federal, I find it hard to characterize that as a tax increase on a state level. By the way, I'd be happy if I were in Tennesse and only had the depreciation adjustment to worry about. In my state of North Carolina, our standard deduction for married people is still locked at $5,500, or $4,000 less that the federal deduction, and our personal exemptions are locked at $2,550, or $500 below federal levels. Which makes a North Carolina married couple's taxable income for state purposes $5,000 more than the federal taxable income even before the depreciation issue. Posted by: Kory at April 8, 2004 01:19 PMBubba, as usual you have your facts partially wrong. Sundquist indeed did the same thing - but it was TEMPORARY and the state recoupled its depreciation schedules to the fed's shortly thereafter. This will be permanent. It represents an increase of state taxes by $75 million - and those taxes will NOT go down if the feds decelerate their depreciation schedules later. Posted by: Bill Hobbs at April 8, 2004 01:32 PMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||