![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Big Media Doesn't Get It | Main | Fish in a Barrel » March 18, 2004Push Poll
It's a push poll designed to get that result. It's a push poll, might I add, by a state-funded university that seeks ever higher flows of taxpayers dollars, a university that has a vested interest in the state raising taxes as increased taxes would go partly toward increasing funding of state universities. Poll results are always determined in part by the questions that are asked, and this one is no different. Prof. Ken Blake, an MTSU journalism professor and associate director of the MTSU Poll and author of the analysis says the polls shows that support for an income tax rises if it, in the question, is paired with a cut in the state sales tax rate, or an exemption for the first $15,000 earned, or an income tax with a flat rate. "What most Tennesseans clearly and firmly oppose is a state income tax enacted on top of the taxes they already pay," Blake said. "But if state residents are offered an income tax paired with ending sales taxes on groceries and lowering sales taxes on other items, support moves well above 50 percent. Mentioning either a $15,000 exemption or a flat tax rate in conjunction with an income tax also produces increases in support, although these are less dramatic. Finally, it’s possible that about three-fourths of Tennesseans would support an income tax plan that included all three of these options."The pollsters present three scenarios designed to make the income tax sound more palatable, but oversimplified those scenarios. For example, they don't ask the respondents if they would support an income tax coupled with a sales tax reduction "if there was nothing to stop legislators from raising the sales tax later." And they don't ask "would you support an income tax with a flat rate if there was nothing to prevent them from raising the tax rate or adding higher rates to it later, and if there was no cap on how high they could raise it? If the MTSU Poll wanted to be truly helpful, they would have asked several additional questions about the state's tax code and pending legislation that would cap government spending and taxes based on a formula tied to economic growth. Two good questions: "Would you support amending the state constitution to require voter approval of future tax increases and new taxes?" "Would you support amending the state constitution to cap the growth of government spending to a reasonable rate that accounts for inflation and population growth, and requires surplus tax revenue be rebated to taxpayers? Those questions would accurately reflect the proposed Taxpayers Bill of Rights amendment now pending in the state legislature. And, I should add, I think if the pollsters asked people if they'd support an income tax if that amendment was already in the constitution, they'd find more support for it. For more on the Taxpayers Bill of Rights amendment, go here. Posted in Taxpayers Bill of Rights
| Linked By |
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com Comments
I find it convienent that this 'poll' is released which a TaBOR is being considered and the so-called 'independent commision' is set to release it's 'conclusion' this fall. The timing of this is nothing more than a transparent setup - and the media is sucking up it up. Posted by: DocB at March 18, 2004 07:25 AMThe problem with the poll is that it presents only positive scenarios for the income tax and not negative scenarious (uncapped rates, re-raising the sales tax later, etc.) that could shift the views of the pll respondents in negative direction. The other problem with the poll is it ignores actual pending legislation vis a vis the state's tax structure in favor of focusing on hypothetical legislation that has not been filed. (And if it was filed, I guarantee you won't see thousands of people honking horns, sending emails and making ohone calls in SUPPORT of the income tax - which would be proof that this "push poll" got the desired, but incorrect, result. Posted by: Bill Hobbs at March 18, 2004 08:40 AMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||