About | Portfolio | Backup | Archives | PayPal Tip Jar | Amazon Tip Jar | Shop@Amazon
Advertising


Search BillHobbs.com
Stats, Etc.


TTLB Ecosystem Stats
Powered by FeedBurner


« I'm a Libertarian, But I Don't Vote That Way | Main | Bicycle Bloggers »

March 10, 2004

California Killing Religious Freedom

Religious freedom is under assault in California. Shawn Macomber reports...

In California, Catholics are faced with a new rubric imposed by judicial fiat: Faith, henceforth, will be defined by the state. Religious freedoms will come with a big ol' asterisk alongside them from now on, to be clarified only by a government-appointed interpreter of the law.

Hyperbole? On Monday the California Supreme Court determined by a 6-1 vote that Catholic Charities of Sacramento - a social-service agency - must provide contraceptives, outlawed by their faith, as part of its prescription-drug benefit for its employees.

The California state legislature passed a law in 2000 requiring prescription drug plans to cover contraceptives for female employees. Because women paid 68 percent more than men for out-of-pocket birth control prescriptions and were more likely to have to cover the costs of "unintended pregnancies," legislators reasoned, any organization that failed to pay for contraceptives was practicing "gender discrimination."

The legislature, however, did provide an exemption from the law for religious groups who believe that the use of artificial contraception is sinful. But strangely, despite the overt religious nature of the group's work, the court ruled that Catholic Charities was not a religious organization because it hired non-Catholics and offered such "secular services" as counseling, low-income housing and immigration services to people, regardless of their faith.

In other words, by following the tenets of their faith and taking seriously its charge to reach out to the neediest among us, Catholic Charities ceased to be a religious organization, and the protections such a designation bestowed vanished into thin air.

Read the whole thing.

Posted in Religion | Linked By |
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com
Comments

This is not an abridgement of religion. It is an abridgement of freedom of association and the right to do what one will with their property.

Catholic Charities of Sacramento is NOT a religious organization, under the law. As a secular organization, it is subject to all of the same rules and laws that every other business, non-profit, charity, etc. is subject to.

If you are asserting that they are a religious organization, upon what standard are you deciding that they are religious in nature? And where exactly will you draw the line? Will a religious person that owns an apartment complex/a quadraplex/a duplex/a house be able to refuse to rent to someone because of their religious beliefs? Where and why would you draw the line in those cases?

The government has drawn the line between relgious and secular organizations, and this charity falls on the side of the secular. If you want to try and change this line, go right ahead, but this specific ruling is not an infringement of religious liberty.

Byna, thinks that the government meddles too much in how people utilize their property.

Posted by: Byna at March 10, 2004 11:37 PM
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!









Remember personal info?






Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




back to top
Advertising

Video
Palin Acceptance Speech

McCain Acceptance Speech

I Also Blog At...
button-fcs-blog.gif
Archives
Blogroll