![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Robot Bloggers | Main | Blogger Rex Says Tax Cuts Boost Employment » March 8, 2004Five Reasons Liberals Should Support The Taxpayers Bill of Rights
1. TaBOR will cause the state to manage its resources more wisely and set priorities - reducing wasteful spending. Let me briefly explain the Taxpayers Bill of Rights, and why it will do those things. The Taxpayers Bill of Rights as proposed in Tennessee has four basic parts: 1. Cap the rate of growth of state government spending to a reasonable growth rate based on population and inflation. Now, here in greater detail are the reasons liberals should favor that simple amendment. TaBOR will cause the state to manage its resources more wisely and set priorities - reducing wasteful spending. By limiting the annual growth of state spending (a limit the legislature can break in emergencies, by the way), TaBOR makes legislators focus spending on programs that matter the most - and matter to the most people - such as healthcare, welfare and education programs. TaBOR will shield existing programs from deep cuts during future economic downturns. As proposed, the Tennessee Taxpayers Bill of Rights forces the legislature to build a large "rainy day" fund with surplus revenue before ever rebating the first dollar to the first taxpayer. That large reserve fund would be mandated for use during economic slumps and revenue shortfalls to cushion existing programs against damaging spending cuts. TaBOR will foster more grassroots political involvement and encourage better communication between citizens and their elected representatives. By requiring public approval in a referendum on spending surplus revenue or raising taxes, TaBOR will create more citizen involvement in government and cause legislators to diligently communicate with citizens about the reasons for a proposed tax increase or a proposal to spend surplus revenue rather than rebate it. Think that's pie in the sky? In 1992, the Rocky Mountain News urged Colorado voters to reject a Taxpayers Bill of Rights amendment when it was on the ballot for voters in that state - but but seven years later, when voters in Washington state had the chance to pass the similar Initiative 695, the newspaper published an editorial urging Washington staters vote "Yes," saying TABOR "strengthens the political process rather than destroys it." The newspaper added: Shifting responsibility for taxes from politicians to the public hasn't resulted in automatic rejection of every spending plan. But while TABOR hasn't straitjacketed government, it has accomplished a number of good things. It has heightened interest in elections and government policy; it has given public officials mandates they otherwise would have lacked; it has shrunk voters' sense of helplessness over the use of their hard-earned taxes; and last, but hardly least, it has strengthened the fiscal responsibility of state and local government."TaBOR will foster more trust and confidence in government. The public will trust and have confidence in state government more with TaBOR because of the increased accountability to and communications with the citizenry regarding state finances and spending. TaBOR will make it easier to pass a state income tax. I list this one last, but it is perhaps the primary reason liberals who favor reforming Tennessee's tax code and implementing an income tax should favor the Taxpayers Bill of Rights. You see, the Taxpayers Bill of Rights, as proposed, is neutral on the question of what kind of tax code Tennessee has, and - don't tell the anti-income tax folks - having TaBOR in the state constitution creates an easier path for passing a state income tax in Tennessee. Currently, those favoring an income tax must try to pass a constitutional amendment - a difficult and time-consuming process - or try to pass an income tax statutorily. The latter path takes less time, but is fraught with difficulty. Some legislators believe an income tax to be unconstitutional. Others simply don't want to run for re-election having voted for one. But TaBOR's referendum provision for new taxes and tax increases would be a new and shorter constitutional route for amending the constitution to create an income tax. Income tax advocates would no longer need to convince a majority of legislators to vote to create an income tax - they would merely need to convince a majority of legislators to put a tax reform/income tax proposal on the ballot, a much easier sale. And because TaBOR puts a premium on citizen involvement and requires a statewide referendum, income tax advocates would seek to craft a tax reform proposal that would appeal to the majority of Tennesseans, to enhance its chances of passage. As I documented in this white paper, liberals in Colorado hated the Taxpayers Bill of Rights when it was proposed, and fought it tooth and nail - but later used the referendum process to pass what amounted to a permanent tax increase dedicated to public education. And it did pass - proving that, even under a Taxpayers Bill of Rights, voters will approve higher taxes and larger government spending, if they approve of the proposal and are given a chance to vote on it. I urge you to call legislators and encourage them to support the Taxpayers Bill of Rights. Below I've listed all nine members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, including their phone and fax numbers and email address. They are the most crucial legislators in this debate as of right now - TaBOR, also known as Senate Joint Resolution 88, goes before the Senate Judiciary Committee tomorrow. Senator Doug Jackson-D Senator David Fowler-R Senator Tommy Kilby-D Senator Larry Trail-D Senator Steve Cohen-D Senator Joe Haynes-D Sen. Curtis S. Person, Jr. - R Sen. Mark Norris - R Sen. Michael R. Williams - R Posted in Taxpayers Bill of Rights
| Linked By |
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com Comments
FYI...the Senate Judiciary Committee is meeting from 3:30-5:30 tomorrow afternoon. Posted by: Blake at March 8, 2004 08:13 PMThe bill has been moved to March 16. Posted by: Bill Hobbs at March 8, 2004 08:34 PMI'm going to try to head down there for the committee meeting whenever they end up discussing it. Hopefully it won't be delayed past the 16th then. Posted by: Blake at March 8, 2004 11:08 PMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||