![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Unlocking the Door on Home-Based Biz | Main | Good TaBOR Coverage from WKRN » March 3, 2004Failed Blogger Believes Media, QuitsTechnology blogger Frank Catalano says he's quitting his Random Bytes blog because a recent research study from the Pew Internet & American Life Project finds that "two-to-seven percent of adult Internet users write blogs, and only about eleven percent read blogs." Catalano started Random Bytes on March 20, 2003. He gave it less than a year. There's no traffic tracker on his page, but Technorati finds that his blog had been linked to by just 5 other blogs - and four of those are very recent linkers, having linked to his blogging swan song. Apparently, Catalano wasn't very good at letting others know his blog existed. For comparison, my blog has existed since Nov. 30, 2003 - and today it has been linked to by more than 200 other blogs. (Technorati says 194 while the TTLB Ecosystem says 240 unique inbound links. Catalano's TTLB count: ZERO.) Catalano was as bad as marketing his blog as he is at math. That 11 percent of American adults reading blogs regularly amounts to some 14 million Americans - well more than the 3.6 million Americans who tuned in to CNN during the Iraq war. Frank, the truth is that millions of Americans read blogs, and there are lots of blogs with significant numbers of readers. HobbsOnline, for instance, is read by between 1,000 and 2,000 people every day. Frank, the truth is, millions of people are reading blogs. It's just that almost nobody was reading your blog. Until now, that is - when ironically, you're going to have your biggest readership. Frank Catalano. Nothing became his blog like the leaving of it. UPDATE: My readers astutely note some more things about Former Blogger Frank Catalano. 1. He calls himself and Internet marketing consultant and is co-author of a book, Internet Marketing For Dummies. So how come he failed to market his blog? 2. "It certainly didn't help him that over the period of 12 months he didn't have a single post in 7 of those months and had a grand total of 12 posts." - Rob Bernard. Yeah, it's hard to see why he didn't have a flood of readers, with all that good bloggage to read. 3. He had no blogroll - you don't get traffic in the blogosphere without sharing it too. 4. He has no Site Meter or other traffic-tracker on his site, so he can't know, really, how many readers he had - and wouldn't know if another blog linked to him. And if you don't know where your reader is coming from, you can't thank the blog that sent him to your blog, meaning you fail to encourage the development of a relationship that can lead to more traffic. In other words, Frank Catalano was a lousy blogger. Based on my inbound links and average daily readership, I'm anywhere from 200 to 2000 times better at marketing a blog than Catalano is - and he co-wrote this book. Life is not fair. UPDATE: Catalano responded in the comments below, and also via an email which, being a reasonable guy, I'll share with you. You seem like a reasonable guy from reading your other posts.Fair points. But when you announce you are quitting your blog in the same post as reporting that the Pew study says blogs have few readers (even though the data actually showed blogs, collectively, have more regular readers than CNN has regular viewers), it sure seems to imply that lack of readership is a reason you're dropping the blog. SECOND THOUGHT: Blogs are both a publishing mechanism, as Catalano says, and a publishing medium. Catalano is wrong on that. What makes blogs a different kind of medium is the interactivity with readers and with other blogs, which has created a new kind of journalism which, in the past, I've called "collaborative peer-reviewed journalism," but in fact is more accurately called "collaborative reader-involved journalism." Whatever you call it, the blog medium allows for stories to evolve over time as readers add their insights, provide links to new data and documents that support or challenge the original post, and use hyperlinks to build the structure of the conversation. It's a paradigm shift from traditional media's philosophy of only publishing (or broadcasting) a story when it is considered "complete." In the blogosphere, stories are never really completed. In that, the blog medium more nearly approximates the reality it covers - for in life stories are rarely complete either. Blogs done right chronicle ever-changing life, while traditional media reports snapshots and fragments of a moment in time. But Catalano's not totally wrong. The way he used the blog publishing mechanism made no use of the blog medium's revolutionary nature. Along the way he experienced the truth that a blog that doesn't invite readers to be involved in the conversation won't have many readers. A final point: In his farewell posting, Catalano said blogs by bloggers with traditional media connections tend to do better than independent blogs. He notes the success of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer's blog. But according to Technorati today, HobbsOnline has 198 inbound links from other blogs and 267 total inbound links, while SeattlePI.com's Buzzworthy blog has just 49 inbound links from other blogs, and 73 total inbound links. Admittedly, my blog had a traditional-media tie-in in its early months, via my weekly column in a start-up newspaper. But that newspaper had yet to attract any significant readership, and when I stopped writing that column my blog had no more than 50 readers per day. Today, HobbsOnline has 1,500 daily readers, on average, and has achieved that as an independent blog with no media tie-in. How did I do it? In part by inviting my readers into the conversation. UPDATE: Here's one news outlet that got the story right re the Pew Internet & American Life project's recent data on blogging. The headline: Most Web Users Write, Not Just Read.The story lead: "A new survey says that 53 million American adults - 44 percent of Internet users - have used the Internet to publish their thoughts, respond to others, post pictures, share files and otherwise contribute to the explosion of content available online." It's a conversation. Posted in Blogging & Journalism
| Linked By |
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com Comments
Hmm, no sitemeter (hence no blogfishing). No blogroll. And no evidence of blogoticking. No wonder. Posted by: SayUncle at March 3, 2004 10:37 AMWithout a blogroll it's hardly a blog. And w/out a sitemeter or other traffic tracker, it's impossible to know if someone linked to you - making it difficult to reciprocate, and build traffic by sharing it. And without a comments feature you can't interact with readers, another traffic-building strategy. Without some or all of those things, it's not really a full-fledged blog, is it? Posted by: Bill Hobbs at March 3, 2004 10:45 AMI predict similar results for the new liberal talk radio network. Posted by: Michael Williams at March 3, 2004 02:11 PMAnd he's a MARKETING consultant? And co-author of Internet Marketing For Dummies? Marketer, heed thyself. Posted by: Jay Solo at March 3, 2004 03:34 PM"For comparison, my blog has existed since Nov. 30, 2003 - and today it has been linked to by more than 200 other blogs." Curse you, Bill Hobbs*: my site's been around for two weeks longer and I have maybe half your traffic and links**. Although I'm apparently ahead of this guy: of course, it would have helped if he had posted more often. Or got somebody to pitch in. Or both. Moe *OK, no, I'm not actually cursing you. **Despite a crafty reciprocal-linking scheme; I find it useful in its own right, but as this site shows it doesn't always work. :) Posted by: Moe Lane at March 3, 2004 04:25 PMIt certainly didn't help him that over the period of 12 months he didn't have a single post in 7 of those months and had a grand total of 12 posts. Posted by: Rob Bernard at March 3, 2004 06:12 PMI've been blogging for two, three years now - first on Blogger, then on 1and1.com hosting. I'm not doing it for the hits, that's for sure. I'm doing it more as an on-line thought repository than anything else. And one thing that's rather amusing - accordning to the TTLB I'm actually up to the Slimy mollusc category! Evolution in action, baby! I started as an insignifigant microbe, and I might be a flippery fish soon! Woo-hoo! J. Posted by: JLawson at March 3, 2004 07:08 PMWhipping boy here. Just wanted to correct the main assertion as to my motive for quitting my personal blog. For what it's worth, the Pew study didn't convince me to kill Random Bytes. Its timing was coincidental, but it seemed worth mentioning. I killed it for the reason I stated in the easy; I was too busy to keep it going. And too busy to promote it -- it was a personal blog. Now, my professional blog -- the technology one, Byte Me -- continues. It has a readership I'm satisfied with. As to stats ... I use Blogger Stats to check my readership numbers. That's how I knew Random Bytes wasn't doing well. And percentage-wise, lots of people read blogs. But lots of people write them, too. And if you do the math on the Pew numbers, flawed or not, you'll find that means, at best, an average of five readers for each blog. So while some blogs get huge amounts, huge amounts of blogs get very few readers. My main point was that you don't put a blog up and expect lots of people to automatically read it just because it's on the Web. But there are people deluding themselves thinking just that. You're right. Life's not fair. Posted by: Frank Catalano at March 4, 2004 01:28 AMJust to nitpick, since you brought it up twice, there are countless invisible-to-the-surfer methods of tracking traffic without using sitemeter or other such services. Posted by: Mason at March 4, 2004 02:59 AMI stand corrected on the traffic-tracker point. Posted by: Bill Hobbs at March 4, 2004 06:35 AMTwo other points: 1) I don't necessarily agree the blog is a new medium, but I'll concede it's debatable. "Web site" is the medium. The concept of having a continuing or developing conversation on the Internet goes back to bulletin boards and moderated newsgroups. Nothing new about that. The new part is hyperlinking those opinions and discussions on the Web (and even Web bulletin boards could do that). Heck, I remember contributing heavily to science-fiction fanzines in my teen years which had exactly the same kind of back and forth, but in paper. 2) True, I didn't implement comments, lots of reciprocal links or have a lot of posts. But that plays back, again, to the central reason why I abandoned Random Bytes -- lack of time to properly write it and promote it. I already had started taking down archived posts before I wrote the essay. I do plan to use any extra time (as I've posted elsewhere) on my main tech blog, Byte Me. Finally, there's a curious twist in some of the criticism I'm getting. If I'm not using blogging tools the exact way some Perfect Bloggers say I should, then I'm not blogging? I think the point of blogging tools is that people use or not use them as they desire. Otherwise, you lock the state-of-the-art into what a cadre of bloggers says it should be ... and that runs counter to the idea that Web and Internet tools build on each other on an ongoing basis to create something appropriate for the user ... and eventually yet another new construct. Thanks for continuing the conversation. Posted by: Frank Catalano at March 4, 2004 09:29 AMFrank's been awful nice about the pile-on. Without reading your personal or professional site, I can at least give you credit for defending yourself without getting snarky. Best of luck with your professional site. Posted by: Jeremiah at March 4, 2004 02:44 PMYou people. Bloggers. I have never seen a community so concentrated with self-inflation. I really must point one thing out, before I go on. The lack of a 'site-tracker' such as 'site meter' in no way means that an individual is not tracking traffic to a given website. 'site-trackers' are actually very inneficient tools. Most professionals simply parse the logfiles of there web server. Get that straight, and btw, just because you don't see something in the source of am HTML document, doesn't mean it's not there. Now, that said; You people (bloggers) are also a very interesting course study in humanism because your medium is in fact, so public and anonymous (for the most part) - or at the very least - removed. And, I believe that humanism is rotten at the core so deduce your own conclusions from here. Last thing: Go. Move on wth your lives. Leave Frank alone before he sues someone for libel - I already would have. Posted by: Josh Smith at March 30, 2004 03:28 AMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||