![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Secrecy, Lies and Legislation 2 | Main | USA Today: "Most Economists" Blame Tax Cuts For Strong Economy » February 19, 2004Economy Update: Backpedaling ForwardDemocrats are abuzz over recent statements from the White House that what matters isn't the prediction of job growth, but actual signs of economic improvement - some bloggers are rather taken with the notion that the White House "backtracked" on its prediction of 2.6 million new jobs this year, although it's actually the Associated Press that used that phrase. What the White House did was refuse to get drawn into a debate over a prediction, knowing that if they affirmed the number it would become not a prediction but a promise and if a mere 2.5999 million jobs were created, the press and the opposition would hammer them for breaking a promise. As presidential spokesman Scott McClellan said, it's reality that matters - actual people getting real jobs and earning real incomes - not some prediction in a book. "People can debate the numbers all they want," McClellan said. "The President is interested in the actual number of jobs being created, and the President is interested in making sure that everybody who is looking for a job can find one."Indeed, Sen. Tom Daschle and five other Democratic U.S. Senators sent Bush a letter challenging him "to provide meaningful jobs predictions that all Americans, including your own Cabinet, would find credible." The Democrats want to debate predictions - because they don't want to talk about the various actual signs that the economic recovery is getting ever stronger. For instance: The Conference Board's Index of Leading Economic Indicators rose a healthy 0.5 percent in January. Evidence continues to build that the U.S. economy is strengthening - including on the jobs front. The Conference Board said Thursday that its Composite Index of Leading Economic Indicators rose 0.5 percent in December to 115.0 following gains of 0.2 percent in December and 0.3 percent in November. The index is closely watched because it forecasts trends in the economy in the next three to six months...Also, jobless claims fell sharply, industrial production is surging, and families are getting to keep more of their own money - here's an example of that from Chattanooga, just two hours down the road from HobbsOnline HQ. [Hat tip: George W. Bush campaign blog.] Let me remind you of what the Joint Economic Committee of Congress said just 10 days ago about the economy - that it is posed for "strong and sustainable growth": The recovery continues at a strong pace. Payrolls increased by over 100,000 jobs in January, as activity in manufacturing and services industries accelerated. Last year closed with the economy growing at a 4% annual rate and productivity growing at a 2.7% annual rate, well above long-run averages. Inflation remains benign, allowing the Federal Reserve to maintain short-term interest rates at historical lows, and recent tax relief continues to benefit consumers and businesses. Forecasters see continued robust growth, low inflation, and accelerating job gains throughout the year.Let the Left argue over predictions and pretend it matters. The nation's economy is growing, and George W. Bush's tax cuts bear a big part of the blame. Posted in Economy & Business
| Linked By |
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com Comments
Bush is just lowering expectations, Bill. He runs that play as often as he can, and usually scores. Posted by: Tonto at February 19, 2004 10:49 PMI work at Texas Instruments' R&D fab. We have been pushed into acual production at the R&D center in order to keep up with demand for our latest products. TI is heavily loaded and using every move in the book to keep up with orders until the new fab is online, hopefully by July 2005. We were going to break ground in 2005 but will need the new fab sooner so they jerked up the timetable by a year. These will bring those jobs in from the foundries (mostly in Europe and the Pacific Rim) back to the US. Am I bullish or what? Posted by: Random Numbers at February 20, 2004 01:29 AMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||