About | Portfolio | Backup | Archives | PayPal Tip Jar | Amazon Tip Jar | Shop@Amazon
Advertising


Search BillHobbs.com
Stats, Etc.


TTLB Ecosystem Stats
Powered by FeedBurner


« On Candidates' Blogs | Main | What if the Conventional Wisdom is Wrong? »

January 18, 2004

Oregon Eyes Taxpayers Bill of Rights

While Tennessee's governor is foolishly planning to spend Tennessee's rapidly growing revenue surplus - rather than save it for a rainy day - out in Oregon they may set a better example, by embracing the Taxpayers Bill of Rights concept.

Reports the Portland Oregonian newspaper:

The rapid growth in state revenues, and the corresponding increase in state spending, has prompted calls for a rainy day fund to get the state through hard times, and for stricter limits on lawmakers' ability to increase the budget.

State Republican Party Chairman Kevin Mannix is pushing a plan similar to the Taxpayer Bill of Rights passed by Colorado voters in 1992. "Tabor," as it's known, links state spending growth directly to inflation and population figures and requires the state to return immediately any surplus revenue it receives above those limits. It also requires voter approval for tax increases.

Colorado, Mannix and others note, is similar in size and population to Oregon, although it relies on both income and sales taxes to pay for state programs. Since the spending limit was enacted, yearly budgets in Colorado have increased by less than 5 percent.

Critics say - and many lawmakers tacitly agree - that the pressure can be overwhelming on the Legislature to spend all the money the state brings in.

Tennessee needs a Taxpayers Bill of Rights.

Posted in Taxpayers Bill of Rights | Linked By |
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com
Comments

Huh. Blowing a surplus is foolish? Does that mean you've changed your mind about Bush, too?

Posted by: Chris Wage at January 19, 2004 11:06 AM

Cute, Chris, but of course there are big differences between state and federal budgets, not the least of which is the federal government has an array of deficit-financing tools available to it that the states don't have.

And as for Bush, he didn't blow a real surplus. You call it a surplus, but all it really was was a projected surplus if the economy stayed red hot. Well, the economy didn't stay hot - we had the Clinton recession - and most of the projected "surplus" evaporated. Bush's tax cuts eliminated about $1.3 trillion of that projected $10 trillion surplus, but Bush didn't spend surplus money, he simply passed a tax reduction that meant $1.3 trillion in future taxes would not be collected.

By contrast, the state "surplus" I am talking about is an actual pile of cash that is surplus. It is not a projection 1, 2, 5 or 10 years hence. It is actual money. Cold, hard cash.

Surely, you are smart enough to see the difference.

Posted by: Bill at January 20, 2004 08:48 AM
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!









Remember personal info?






Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




back to top
Advertising

Video
Palin Acceptance Speech

McCain Acceptance Speech

I Also Blog At...
button-fcs-blog.gif
Archives
Blogroll