About | Portfolio | Backup | Archives | PayPal Tip Jar | Amazon Tip Jar | Shop@Amazon
Advertising


Search BillHobbs.com
Stats, Etc.


TTLB Ecosystem Stats
Powered by FeedBurner


« A Spending Cap for Tennessee? | Main | Email Alert Service Update »

January 6, 2004

Iraq: Attacks Down Sharply Since Saddam Nabbed

Army Maj. Gen. Charles H. Swannack, Jr., commanding general of the 82nd Airborne Division in its area of operations in Iraq, said today that attacks on coalition troops are down 60 percent in recent weeks. I first learned about this via Donald Sensing and then found the transcript of the brifing at the Department of Defense website.

I have not found this reported by the mainstream media, except for on the website of a television station in Harlingen, Texas. (Google search). This Reuters report from the press briefing does not mention it.

Here is the key excerpt from the briefing...

About six weeks ago, I stood here and described for you the state of Al Anbar Province, which has almost one-third of the land mass of all of Iraq and was part of the former Ba'athist stronghold. I described then that we were turning the corner in the West, and I'm here to tell you that we have turned that corner.

I also can tell you that we're on a glide-path toward success as attacks against Task Force All American forces have decreased almost 60 percent over the past month. I believe there are a number of reasons for this decline in the attacks. Our strategy has not changed and it remains very simple: first, we actively pursue, locate and kill or capture former regime elements, extremists, foreign fighters and criminals throughout our area of operations; second, we create jobs to employ military-age males in productive employment; and third, we consolidate or destroy the vast amounts of leftover weapons and ammunition from Saddam's military machine and make these unavailable to the enemy today. This strategy has reaped success and is the reason that we've turned the corner.

Let me further explain our success. We have killed or captured a large number of the leaders, the financiers and facilitators of the insurgency. We're not done yet, as there are a lot more of these folks out there, but we have been able to remove the ones recruiting, directing and providing weapons for attacks on coalition forces. As such, recent attacks on coalition forces have been much less effective in terms of injuries and equipment damage, and the devices employed now accurately reflect the title "improvised."

Let me just show you a makeshift RPG. This device right here was captured recently, before Christmas.

Now there are still some sophisticated devices out there, but this tells you of the dire need for forces attacking us to go ahead and use some improvised equipment to try to attack us. This is an RPG launcher.

Also, with the capture of Saddam Hussein, we have moved forward because those who had hope for his return no longer have that hope, and those who feared his return no longer have that fear. This lack of hope and fear within the populace has positively reflected in the surge of cooperation from all segments of the population at large.

Most notable is the number of local Iraqis turning information to our forces to help us rid this province of anti-coalition forces. A lot of good Iraqi people are tired of the violence and want to help the coalition. Tips turned in to us for action, both through our telephone lines and in person, are up over 50 percent right now.

Do you ever wonder if the mainstream press is doing everything it can to tell you the whole story - even the good news - from Iraq? Wonder no more. They aren't.

UPDATE 1/07: A story yesterday from Agence France Presse carries a quote from Swannack on the decline in attacks - but wraps it inside coverage of attacks, implying Swannack isn't to be believed.

Posted in Iraq
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com
Comments

And this is a surprise because...???

Have you noticed how little news is reported about the southern portion of Iraq where the Coalition Forces are mainly English? That's because they are not having nearly as many problems with insurgents and the Iraqi people are actually seeing improvements.

Posted by: Heather at January 7, 2004 01:08 AM

I assume you're asking rhetorically!

Posted by: Michael Williams at January 7, 2004 01:15 AM

I think this just shows that "staying the course" really pays off. If we had shown any signs of wavering or willingness to abandon Iraq part way through the reconstruction, it would only have emboldened the remaining terrorist forces there.

A rock-steady hand an unflinching commitment to see things through to the end can't help but discourage insurgents. Their only hope was to pick off so many of our soldiers that political forces back in the U.S. would do what the pro-Saddam activists could not.

One of my criticisms of President Clinton's foreign policy was that he wavered back and forth at times due to the ever-changing political climate at home. To win a war or long term campaign, you have to chip away at the enemy day after day after day for as long as it takes. Clinton never did that.

Perhaps it's just easier for President Bush to remain on target after 9/11.

Whatever the reason, Bush made it clear that he would pursue terrorists and those that supported or harbored them. Even if it cost him the election, he was going to stick to his guns. I'm glad to see that it is paying off.

Posted by: Ron at January 7, 2004 02:31 AM

CNN reported this all afternoon yesterday.

Posted by: skb at January 7, 2004 09:19 AM

It didn't show up in a Google search as being on their website, and it hasn't appeared in the big daily papers. Here's CNN's main story out of Iraq from Jan. 6. It doesn't even mention the large drop in the number attacks. Not even in its "Other developments" at the end of the story.

I stand by my assessment that the good news is being largely ignored.

After all, the Reuters wire story is likely to be published in far more newspapers, and reach far more people, than ephemeral mentions on CNN.

Posted by: Bill Hobbs at January 7, 2004 10:14 AM

I'm sure a mention on Instapundit would reach more people than afternoon CNN coverage.

Posted by: Michael Williams at January 7, 2004 11:41 AM

Yeah. I sent him the link, but he hasn't used it.

Posted by: Bill Hobbs at January 7, 2004 12:14 PM

I think many media outlets did not want to jump too quickly on the '60% reduction in attacks' story because it was AGAIN too soon to declare victory. After all he hasn't even been in custody for a month!

In fact, with the recent jump in U.S. deaths, they are probably breathing a sigh of relief not to have repeated the 'Mission Accomplished' fiasco.

Posted by: Neil Bush 4 Sale at January 9, 2004 12:58 PM
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!









Remember personal info?






Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




back to top
Advertising

Lamar!

Find the Good
and Praise It
I Also Blog At...
button-fcs-blog.gif
Archives
Blogroll