![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Bias on the Tax Study Commission | Main | Bias Watch: Source Not ID'd as Liberal » January 8, 2003Bubba Likes Taxpayers RightsSouth Knox Bubba says he didn't favor a state income tax, and has lots of nice things to say about my recent Memphis Commercial-Appeal column advocating a Taxpayers Bill of Rights be part of any Tennessee tax reform plan. In the article, [Hobbs] also suggests that instituting a 4% flat income tax, eliminating the Hall Tax on "unearned income" (which actually taxes earned income in some cases, like mine), lowering franchise and excise tax, eliminating inheritance taxes, and lowering the sales tax would generate more state revenues and make Tennessee a business Mecca. Now, the idea of an income tax in any form is about the last thing I would expect from Bill Hobbs, nor would I have expected to find myself agreeing with such an idea. But this is a simple, straightforward proposal that would work, and the only fair way to impose an income tax. The only problem with this idea is that the extreme left liberals will want a graduated tax so the wealthy pay more and they pay less. Hey, any good tax plan has to have a little wealth redistribution, right?Sadly, Gov.-elect Phil Bredesen is opposed to the Taxpayers Bill of Rights. But maybe his opposition can be changed to support. After all, it's a a pretty good way to get re-elected. UPDATE: Bubba says the Tennessee Prosperity Project's agenda on taxation including items similar to the Taxpayers Bill of Rights I've been pushing. So I checked the TPP's "Road Map to Prosperity," basically a political wish list, and sure enough, it has some provisions that are similar in basic concept to the Taxpayers Bill of Rights. The TPP would like to see tax reform that would "cap spending growth in state funds at the growth in the state’s economy and not allow simple legislative override, but instead require either reserving or rebating funds above that rate, and also "require stability and consistency in tax policy, prohibiting retroactive taxation," and "measure the proportion of total citizens’ income that the state may collect, with a suggested maximum of 6 percent." TABOR, as I've outlined it, would limit the state to annual revenue growth equal to inflation plus population growth, and mandate surplus revenue be rebated to taxpayers. Colorado allows for that rebate via rate cuts or direct payments. I would prefer an automatic across-the-board rate cut. Colorado's TABOR also controls the growth of spending by requiring the legislature to go to the people and ask permission in a referendum in order to spend surplus funds on a specific list of projects and programs, rather than rebate the surplus. And the legislature must get permission from voters in order to raise taxes. Colorado's TABOR does allow for a sensible state reserve fund. What's worth noting here is that there is room for common ground on tax reform. I'm a Republican, Bubba's a Democrat, but we both agree that a TABOR-ized tax system would be better than the runaway tax-and-spend system we have now, in which there are no effective controls on the growth of either taxes or spending. And we will soon have a governor committed to better fiscal management, and an F&A commissioner who supports an agenda similar to TABOR. Posted in Taxpayers Bill of Rights
Please support HobbsOnline by doing your online shopping at Amazon.com Comments
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||