About | Portfolio | Backup | Archives | PayPal Tip Jar | Amazon Tip Jar | Shop@Amazon
Advertising


Search BillHobbs.com
Stats, Etc.


TTLB Ecosystem Stats
Powered by FeedBurner


« The Joy of Many Friends | Main | Bam! »

July 25, 2008

Obama Can't Handle the Truth

USA Today: Why can't Obama admit the obvious? The surge worked. Indeed it did. Yet Obama says he still wouldn't have done it. He'd rather we'd quit Iraq more than a year ago, when quitting meant losing. But Obama can't admit the surge worked, because to admit the surge worked is to admit that John McCain was right, and Barack Obama was wrong, and not only that Barack Obama was wrong, but that he was wrong on the biggest foreign policy issue of the last two years. How wrong? Losing-a-war wrong.

You may not like everything President Bush has done. You may think the Iraq war was a bad idea from the get-go. But you have to admit two things: 1. Whatever Bush has done for the last seven years has kept America from being hit a second time by al Qaeda, and, 2) He was right that the war in Iraq was winnable when most everyone was telling him the war was lost, and the surge that McCain championed and Bush adopted was exactly the right strategy.

Frankly, it's impossible to argue that, now that we know the surge worked, that doing the opposite of the surge - Obama's suggested surrender - would have resulted in the increasingly peaceful and stable and -yes - democratic Iraq that we are seeing emerge today.

Obama was wrong; McCain was right. Ironically, it is the very fact that McCain was right and the surge worked which makes Obama's proposal to most withdraw U.S. troops within 16 months even remotely possible. Unless, of course, you thought withdrawing them in defeat was a good idea. Which Obama did.

And now, with even the mainstream media now admitting the surge worked, and admitting the we're on the verge of a stunning victory in Iraq, no thanks to defeatist surrender-artists like Barack Obama - the American people are now telling pollsters that Iraq isn't a big issue in the upcoming election. That makes total sense. Most Americans hate to lose wars even if they didn't support the war in the first place, so when the war was going badly, it was a top issue - for the anti-war crowd because they wanted it ended immediately and for the pro-war crowd because they wanted it won rather than lost.

Now that Iraq is about to be added to America's win column, Americans are focused on other issues. The anti-war crowd is left to carp and complain that the war was a bad idea, but the urgency of forcing an immediate withdrawal has subsided. And war supporters are just happy the surge worked. And the economy and fuel prices have taken center stage.

At first blush, you might think that helps Obama. But does it? The economy that, for all its problems ($4 gas, the credit crisis, falling housing prices, layoffs) is still growing - as McCain adviser and former Fortune 20 CEO Carly Fiorina noted recently, while big business is laying people off, small business continues to generate jobs. Given that small business employs the vast majority of Americans, that's good news.

Obama's prescriptions for the economy include higher taxes on income, on inheritances and on fuel (via higher taxes on fuel producers), and a refusal to allow increased drilling for oil off America's coastline. With the Iraq war now in the win column for the U.S. and a win, politically, for McCain, the more Americans focus on the rehashed same old liberal tax-and-spend policies wrapped in Obama's soaring hope-and-change rhetoric, the less they are likely to like it.

Posted in Campaign Season

Comments

And yet McCain refuses to say what "victory" looks like.
This is just more nationalistic rhetoric for the sheep who think victory sounds good, but have no clue what it is in Iraq.

At best, victory will always be ambiguous regarding Iraq, unless you try to sell the "in 50 years" line, which is as arbitrary and inane as McCain's 100 years if needed.

How do you think the 2 million displaced innocent Iraqis see victory? I'm guessing they'll never view it as such.

Obama is the only person with a plan AND can negotiate with people of all ilk. He won't try to spread "our freedom," because he knows some of the world finds "our freedom" offensive.

We don't need to be invading any more countries that aren't a threat to us because we don't like their leader or way of life. (Unless invited to help defend an ally--which isn't an invasion)

Posted by: Sharon Cobb at July 25, 2008 2:00 AM

Most people know what victory in a war looks like.

The enemy defeated, dead or driven off and unable to return any time soon. A stable, non-threatening government in charge of a stable country in which the enemy is no longer in charge and no longer killing people and blowing things up at any significant rate.

Victory, in short, is an Iraq able to take care of itself.

We're almost there in Iraq - we've turned numerous provinces over to Iraqi military control, and not one of them - not ONE of them - has slipped back into chaos or fallen under the control of al Qaeda or the Iranian' backed "insurgents".

Remember Anbar province and how it at one point was declared "lost" ???

Thanks to the Anbar Awakening, which was survived and succeeded thanks to Bush's surge of 4,000 Marines into Anbar - which McCain backed and Obama didn't - Anbar is about to be one of 10 provinces in Iraq (half of the 18) that have been transferred to the military control of the democratically elected Iraqi government.

That's what victory looks like.

Basra is another province under Iraqi government control - and the Iraqi government defeated the insurgents there in a spectacular battle, in which Iraq forces took the combat lead, a few months ago.

Basra is now peaceful and progressing.

That's what victory looks like.

John McCain doesn't have to say what victory looks like any more than he has to say what the color blue looks like. It looks like victory, and we're seeing it all over Iraq.

Posted by: Bill Hobbs at July 25, 2008 6:57 AM
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!









Remember personal info?






Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




back to top
Advertising

Video


I Also Blog At...
button-fcs-blog.gif
Archives
Blogroll