![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Exposing the elitist rationale behind 'merit selection' | Main | Playing Politics at the Parks Department » June 20, 2008Are We Headed For a Napster-Like Battle Between Blogs and the AP?The AP has settled its legal dispute with The Drudge Retort, but Rodgers Cadenhead, proprietor of that social-network news site, says the larger issue of bloggers using the AP's copyrighted content, is unsettled and "headed for a Napster-style battle on the issue of fair use." Update: Robert Cox has the backstory from inside the AP/Drudge Retort conflict. Now, read the rest of the post... Cadenhead writes: If AP's guidelines end up like the ones they shared with me, we're headed for a Napster-style battle on the issue of fair use.He concludes, as I do, that the AP's middleman rewrite service is an obsolete business model: Says Cadenhead, "If AP's core business is to report the news, blogs and social news sites send millions of people to its articles every day. ... If its core business is to repackage the news, they're in as much trouble as every other middleman on the web." The AP is really both businesses. It does original reporting. As long as it does that well, that part of its business should do alright. But repacking the news is a middleman function that the web and the blogosphere are fast rendering obsolete. Hat tip: Terry Heaton Posted in Journalism & Media
Comments
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||