About | Portfolio | Backup | Archives | PayPal Tip Jar | Amazon Tip Jar | Shop@Amazon
Advertising


Search BillHobbs.com
Stats, Etc.


TTLB Ecosystem Stats
Powered by FeedBurner


« Polls | Main | That Giant Sucking Sound »

February 29, 2008

Too Green

Hillary Clinton has launched a devastating new ad, titled "Children," suggesting - rightly - that Barack Obama is simply too green to handle a major international crisis. Though polls show that, even more than Sen. Clinton, it is John McCain whom Americans most trust right now to handle issues such as terrorism and the war.

New data from the Pew Research Center underscores those other polls:A solid majority of voters (56%) says Obama has not provided enough information about his plans and policies; in contrast, most voters say Clinton and McCain have disclosed enough information about their plans. Moreover, a plurality of voters (43%) says that Obama would not be "tough enough" in dealing with foreign policy and national security issues.So, there is fertile ground for Clinton to build on the feelings many Americans already have that Obama isn't the best choice for keeping us safe.

Clinton's ad is good. It's reminiscent in tone to Ronald Reagan's fabulous "Bear in the Woods" ad from the 1984 campaign and, 24 years later, still one of the best political ads ever made.

But I don't think Clinton's new ad is going to do her much good. If she was facing an inexperienced thin-resume empty-suit like Obama in the general election it might, as the ad's message might appeal to swing voters for whom terrorism, the war and national security are big issues. That's not the people whose support she's battling with Obama for. Obama is being propelled by anti-war Democrats, who don't care about his inexperience because, frankly, they don't think there is a threat. Just as 24 years ago, there are those on the Left who do not believe there is a hostile bear in the woods.

Still, nice ad.

Posted in Campaign Season

Comments

Mr. Hobbs, did you feel the same way when George W. Bush was running for president in 1999-2000?

If not, why not?

Posted by: Brad Wesley at February 29, 2008 11:08 AM

No, because GWB had the advantage of being able to draw on the experience of his father who was president, vice president, CIA director, etc.., and also GWB was around in DC for a lot of that time and knew the players and the experts.

Posted by: Bill Hobbs at February 29, 2008 3:27 PM

Actually, Mr. Hobbs, GWB was barely around Washington at all when GHWB was CIA director, vice president, or president. He was heavily involved in his father's 1988 and 1992 campaigns, but that's about it.

Also, GWB's foreign policy record suggests that he "drew" precious little from his father's far experience.

Posted by: Brad Wesley at March 5, 2008 10:25 AM
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!









Remember personal info?






Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




back to top
Lamar!

Find the Good
and Praise It
I Also Blog At...
button-fcs-blog.gif
Advertising

Archives
Blogroll