![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Sen. Kyle's Coup | Main | Bucking Bredesen » January 10, 2008Very Few Voters Lack Photo IDBased on a random sample of registered voters in Indiana, Mississippi and Maryland, a new study by American University's Center for Democracy and Election Management (CDEM) finds, surprisingly, that only 1.2 percent of registered voters lack a government-issued photo ID, and more than two-thirds of all registered voters in the three states feel that the electoral system would be trusted more if people had to show an ID to vote. The full report, Voter IDs Are Not the Problem: A Survey of Three States, is available online at http://www.american.edu/ia/cdem. The press release itself is chock-full of data showing that voter photo ID requirements are not the evil that Democrats claim. "In brief, the fears that ID requirements could disenfranchise many voters appear unfounded simply because almost all registered voters have photo IDs," said Professor Robert Pastor, co-director of CDEM. "Our report notes that the laws and the application of ID requirements have not been implemented uniformly and gradually, and this has fostered the impression that it is designed to disenfranchise. States could transform what was perceived as a problem into an opportunity by sending mobile units to actively register voters and provide them free photo IDs."It's time the Tennessee Democratic Party and the Democratic leadership in the legislature stopped blocking Republican efforts to make Tennessee elections less vulnerable to voter fraud by enacting voter photo ID legislation. Posted in Campaign Season
Comments
Before I forget, this site is not saving my personal info to a cookie. I'm set to medium-high, if that is why. I think opposition even to a national ID card is knee-jerk and irrational. We already have one in the form of a Social Security number and card. State photo ID is almost universal, even to the point that Tennesseans whose license is revoked can get an identification-only card. If it were left up to me, I'd fingerprint and DNA-sample everyone in this country. What's the problem? The only thing I can see is that it gives the guilty but uncaught less chance of being caught. Back to the voting thing. Retinal scans work, and one must present oneself for one of those. A laptop and a webcam can document every person at the table to vote and would deter fraud. Posted by: Wintermute at January 10, 2008 5:47 PMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||