![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Confirmed: Bredesen's Bunker Would Be Largest Ballroom at Any Governor's Mansion in the Nation | Main | Tennessee's $114.6 Million Surplus » December 12, 2007The Cooper Loophole
The TREF is seeking guidance from the state Attorney General. If the AG says the maximum fine is no more than 15 percent of the "amount in controversy," that would mean it is, by law, profitable for a corrupt legislator to steal money from the legislator's own campaign account. Want to take $10,000? Just cut the TREF a check for $1,500 and you're free and clear. If the Cooper case has exposed a loophole, I'd suggest state law be amended to say "15 percent plus the amount in controversy." Posted in Tennessee Government News
Comments
Sloppy lawyer language seems to be the rule rather than the exception when it comes to Tennessee Law. I used to think that the legislature acted to protect the citizens from eminent domain abuse but the law only says that eminent domain should be "used sparingly." The exceptions allow considerable work arounds and if they take your property anyway, the only sanction seems to be that they can not give it away or transfer it for less than market value. It can still end up as a shopping center or motel. There is no credible definition of public purpose nor any protection against creative justifications. Sloppy law means the courts will eventually decide what it really means. Posted by: Danny L, Newton at December 13, 2007 7:55 AMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||