![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Did Rob Briley Get Off Easy? | Main | Ballroom Dancer » December 17, 2007Chick-A-Boom: Are Bredesens Aiming to Beat New Blasting Regulations?
I checked and, sure enough, Public Chapter 231 for the year 2007 indeed does amend Tennessee Code Title 68, Chapter 105, Part 1, to revise several provisions relative to blasters, and its effective date is January 1, 2008. The bill summary says the new law... Requires the collection and maintenance of specified records regarding drilling for blasting operations; adds requirements for air blasting; requires blasting firms to offer a pre-blast survey at no charge to the owners or occupants of specified structures when the standard table of distance is exceeded; revises registration requirements for blasting and age limits for registration; requires independent limited blasters to maintain liability insurance; and makes numerous technical changes regarding explosives and blasting.Gov. Bredesen signed it into law on May 24, 2007. Thin-skinned as ever, Bredesen Monday blamed criticism of the ballroom project not on legitimate objections to the huge and upward-spiraling cost of the project, but on partisanship and a desire of some to "rub dirt" on him and his wife. The City Paper has the quotes: First Lady Andrea Conte spearheaded the Executive Residence project. Bredesen said Conte has discovered that "no good deed goes unpunished" and was not pleased the construction of Conservation Hall was beginning to become political.Give us a break, Bredesen. You and your wife told us the renovation of the mansion would cost around $9 million, of which only $1.5 million would come from taxpayers. Five years later, we learn that the project - which now includes not just renovation and necessary maintenance of the mansion but also, surprise, an underground ballroom that y'all never mentioned - will cost a total of $19.2 million, of which $12.8 million will come from taxpayers. The total cost and the cost to taxpayers ballooned, while the amount to come from private donations dropped significantly. And as you read the various news reports over the past few weeks you realize two things: the numbers don't add up and the stories coming from the administration keep changing. And then we learned that the Bredesen administration is planning to run roughshod over the local planning commission in Oak Hill, asserting that because the state owns the property it doesn't have to abide by local regulations. Arrogance, lies and taxpayers' pockets being picked - that's why people are upset about this, governor. And not just Republicans. Opposition to this project is not a Republican project, it's real, it's grassroots, it crosses party lines and it's got legs. I have a hunch we don't yet know all the details of the ballroom "bunker" project and that, as more bombshells drop, Bredesen will be wishing he already had a bunker in which to hide... Posted in Tennessee Government News
Comments
I thought building regulations only made it more expensive to build for the other guy. Now your telling me that it makes it more expensive for the taxpayer too? I wonder why they didn't try getting an earmark from the Transportation bill? They could get the money from the hotel tax. This is obviously a lobbyist tourism project. Posted by: Danny L. Newton at December 19, 2007 1:08 PMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||