About | Portfolio | Backup | Archives | PayPal Tip Jar | Amazon Tip Jar | Shop@Amazon
Advertising


Search BillHobbs.com
Stats, Etc.


TTLB Ecosystem Stats
Powered by FeedBurner


« Eclectic Eco-News | Main | Democrat Wants a Do-Over »

November 30, 2007

More Demo Plants

More of the people whose questions CNN featured on the CNN/YouTube Republican Presidential Debate are turning out to have connections to various Democrat campaigns. John Fund at the Wall Street Journal's OpinionJournal.com writes:

Last week, CNN's Anderson Cooper quipped in an interview with Townhall.com that "campaign operatives are people too" and that CNN wasn't worried if political partisans posed questions at the upcoming GOP debate he was moderating. "We don't investigate the background of people asking questions (by submitting video clips). It's not our job," is how he put it.

But now CNN's logo has egg splattered all over it, as it scrambles to explain how a co-chair of Hillary Clinton's veterans' committee was allowed to ask a video question on gays in the military at Wednesday's debate and was also flown by the network from California to the debate site in Florida so he could repeat his question to the candidates in person. CNN claims it verified retired Brig. Gen. Keith Kerr's military status and checked his campaign contribution records, contradicting Mr. Cooper's blasé attitudes. Still, they somehow missed his obvious connection to the Hillary campaign which any Google search would have turned up. CNN later airbrushed Mr. Kerr's question out of its rebroadcast of the debate, indicating that it apparently doesn't think "campaign operatives" are legitimate questioners at the network's debates.

Now it appears that an amazing number of partisan figures posed many of the 30 questions at the GOP debate all the while pretending to be CNN's advertised "undecided voters." Yasmin from Huntsville, Alabama turns out to be a former intern with the Council on American Islamic Relations, a group highly critical of Republicans. Blogger Michelle Malkin has identified other plants, including declared Obama supporter David Cercone, who asked a question about the pro-gay Log Cabin Republicans. A questioner who asked a hostile question about the pro-life views of GOP candidates turned out to be a diehard John Edwards supporter (and a slobbering online fan of Mr. Cooper). Yet another "plant" was LeeAnn Anderson, an activist with a union that has endorsed Mr. Edwards.

It seems more "plants" are being uprooted with each passing day. Almost a third of the questioners seem to have some ties to Democratic causes or candidates. Another questioner worked with Democratic Senator Dick Durbin's staff. A former intern with Democratic Rep. Jane Harman asked a question about farm subsidies. A questioner who purported to be a Ron Paul supporter turns out to be a Bill Richardson volunteer. David McMillan, a TV writer from Los Angeles, turns out to have several paens to John Edwards on his YouTube page and has attended Barack Obama fundraisers.

Given CNN's professed goal to have "ordinary Americans" ask questions at their GOP debate, how likely is that it was purely by accident that so many of the videos CNN selected for use were not just from partisans, but people actively hostile to the GOP's messages and candidates?

Not likely at all. The safe bet - the only smart bet - is that CNN and YouTube - which is owned by the left-leaning Google - set this up.

Memo to GOP presidential candidates: CNN has no credibility and low ratings. Their audience is, largely, Democrats. If you're trying to reach Republican voters before the primaries, CNN ain't the place to waste your time. Do FOX, do ABC, NBC and CBS, and do local TV news.

Posted in Campaign Season

Comments

What about the redneck who asked the question about amnesty? He was in the audience too...was that a plant by the leftist Google?

The Brig. General's question was compelling, they brought him in, to see the Republicans squirm in telling a Brig. General that he shouldn't have been able to be himself while serving his Country. It has less to do with bias, and everything to do with ratings and post-debate media exposure.

Posted by: Sean Braisted at November 30, 2007 9:03 AM

Sean, a primary debate is so that voters in that primary can chose who to vote for, which means the questions should be about that party's issues and candidates and the questioners should be people who are likely to vote in that party's primaries.

The issue of gays in the military is not a big burning debate within the Republican Pary.

Posted by: Bill Hobbs at November 30, 2007 9:22 AM

The issue of gays in the military is not a big burning debate within the Republican Pary.

Perhaps not, but I'm sure some of the Republicans were interested in the responses given by the candidates.

Ultimately, the networks have to worry about ratings too, and simply asking questions about Taxes, Immigration, and guns over and over would get boring after a while.

Posted by: Sean Braisted at November 30, 2007 10:02 AM

Sean Basted misses the point - the questioners were Democrat plants thus they have a negative impact on CNN's credibility. One wonders how loud the uproar if Republicans asked the same questions at DEM's debates.

Posted by: Stan at November 30, 2007 11:04 AM

The CNN debate was simply another form of Censorship by the enemy...allowing the left to filter the Questions was a HUGE mistake...the Fascist Left should never ever be trusted. When are we going to learn this?

Posted by: ELV at November 30, 2007 1:01 PM

The gay warrior got more air time than some of the candidates. This "debate" was nothing short of a hatchet job by the Clinton News Network. After watching the previous CNN debate debacle where they planted the "diamonds or pearls" softball question for their leader should anyone be suprised? Anyone who knows what the Clinton political machine is capable of should have expected no less, just ask Monica, Jennifer, et al.

Posted by: Keith Crowe at November 30, 2007 1:15 PM

You know Sean, I get the impression you aren't a conservative. I personally find watching six Democrats find the most politically expedient way to lie to their audience to get votes to be boring. I'm sure you were far more excited about the question about what kind of jewelry Clinton wants to be more exciting than asking difficult policy questions. Since CNN has been bleeding viewership to Foxnews, maybe they don't know so much about ratings and viewship. Maybe questions about taxes, gun ownership, and immigration aren't so totally boring to the rest of the country as they are to you.

Posted by: Carolynp at November 30, 2007 2:16 PM

Liberals call conservative talk shows and pretend to be confused conservatives all of the time. Asking them who they voted for in the last election usually outs them.
There is obviously a coordinated effort to distort the priorities and ignore the concerns of people who would be thinking about electing a conservative for the next president.
The only reason that I can think of for this behavior is that there is a fear that the Republican candidates will actually connect with people who have a real chance of voting for them. The Democrats, after the 2000 election complained that they could not get their message out. It seems now they have fixed that problem because they can get their message out even to the Republican candidates for president.

Posted by: Danny L. Newton at December 1, 2007 3:19 AM
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!









Remember personal info?






Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




back to top
Lamar!

Find the Good
and Praise It
I Also Blog At...
button-fcs-blog.gif
Advertising

Archives
Blogroll