About | Portfolio | Backup | Archives | PayPal Tip Jar | Amazon Tip Jar | Shop@Amazon
Advertising


Search BillHobbs.com
Stats, Etc.


TTLB Ecosystem Stats
Powered by FeedBurner


« Happy to Be Number 3 | Main | Tennessee Democrats Tapped Hsu (But Not in a Restroom!) »

September 4, 2007

Critics: State's Report on Impact of Illegals Purposely Biased

tnflag.jpgFrom NewsChannel5: Critics Charge State Comptroller's Immigration Report Is Biased.

Several lawmakers are accusing the comptroller's office of skewing the facts and presenting a biased report to possibly shape future legislation.

Another critic Carol Swain, a law and political science professor at Vanderbilt, said the report, titled Immigration Issues in Tennessee, is biased. Swain, who has written a book about immigration, questions the staff's research findings.

You'll find a video link at the link above.

Posted in Immigration

Comments

The State Comptroller General spends too much time doing political hit pieces on public policy that does not have an extreme Left leaning. They do "studies" on obesity and are constantly looking for projects to spend more money on. They even work out plans to make sure that the BEP keeps pumping money from the haves to the have-nots by redefining what ability to pay means.

The Comptroller Generals Office has been used to criticize the former Republican Governor for being unable to get road projects done but keeps well away when the same thing could be said about the progress at TDOT.

The Comptroller's office wrote a report that stated that TDOT needed an objective project selection process and then proceeded to say that TDOT should be modeled on five other "peer" states. All except one "peer" state had higher per capita income and all "peer" states had higher gas taxes. One state had an income per mile of road six times that of Tennessee. Those "peer" states were Florida, Maryland Wisconsin,North Carolina and Washington.

The objective system that was suggested was nothing but an excuse to spend more money on non-highway projects and to prevent the concentration of effort on controlling congestion by keeping the number of new lane-miles added to the system in line with the population increases. Nothing was said in the last performance audit about the outrageous cost and ineffectiveness of the County Seat Connector Projects or the Appalachian Development Highway System. I would like to see a performance audit on congressional earmarks. It would not be that hard after several years to compare the safety and capacity of roads added due to earmarks and roads generated within the TDOT system without earmarks.

It is past time that we have a real performance audit of TDOT but this Comptroller General is not the one to do it. This Comptroller Generals office, in my opinion, has been used in a cynical way to give political cover for questionable public policy.

Posted by: Danny L. Newton at September 4, 2007 1:38 PM

The "report" isn't worth two cents. But your money and my money was spent to deceive us.

Sick of it. Pretty much literally at this point.

Posted by: Donna Locke at September 4, 2007 11:23 PM
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!









Remember personal info?






Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




back to top
Advertising

Lamar!

Find the Good
and Praise It
I Also Blog At...
button-fcs-blog.gif
Archives
Blogroll