![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
July 30, 2007Sprechen sie Deutsch? *Here's a nice bit of citizen-journalism investigating the demise of German language classes at Wilson Central High School in Lebanon, TN, a bit east of Nashville. A nice video news report - and, really, about as good as what you'll see on the local news much of the time. *Spelling corrected. Sad Day for the SurrendercratsThe New York Times reports that public support for the Iraq war is rising, and Democratic analysts - again in the NYT - admit the surge is working. Harry Reid, Barack Obama and the rest of the Surrendercrats can't be happy about this.
July 28, 2007Will They Never Learn?A stupid company with stupid lawyers is commencing legal action against a Nashville blogger. They should have read this first (and all the prior related posts linked within). Memo to Jackson Miller: Post every document you receive from the lawyers. Their client will back down and call off the dogs soon enough.
July 27, 2007TVA Considers Nuking Global WarmingThe Tennessee Valley Authority is preparing a major effort to combat global warming. Read all about it - and why it is necessary - at the Ecotality blog today. Here's the link. Bredesen Moves Qualifacts Out of Blind Trust
I found that information after reading an interesting story published a week ago in the Chattanooga Times-Free Press regarding the nonpartisan Center for Public Integrity giving Tennessee an "F" grade for failing to require its governor to disclose certain personal financial information, and was intrigued by a comment the governor made in the story. Regular readers of BillHobbs.com may remember that last year I wrote a series of posts about the sudden resignation of then-TennCare director, J.D. Hickey, whom Bredesen had hired to run TennCare. Hickey resigned on short notice and became the CEO of Qualifacts. The governor's office never revealed the extent of Bredesen's role in Hickey's hiring at Qualifacts, but left the implication that Bredesen wasn't involved as Qualifacts was in a blind trust. Spurred by emails from a company insider who told me - though I was unable to confirm it - that Bredesen had participated in at least one Qualifacts board meeting while serving as governor, I wrote a series of posts a year ago raising questions that the mainstream media had failed to ask regarding Hickey's sudden move to Qualifacts, seeking to determine what role, if any, did Bredesen play in Qualifacts' decision to hire Hickey, and whether Bredesen's holdings in Qualifacts, a privately-held company, really were in a blind trust. You can read those posts here: We Need More Qualifacts - July 8, 2006, The coverage here clearly made the administration nervous, though they needn't have worried as the mainstream media moved on without digging further into the story. Now comes the Chattanooga Times-Free Press report on the Center for Public Integrity's failing grade for Tennessee regarding disclosure requirements of its chief executive's business interests. Center for Public Integrity officials said they flunked Tennessee and 20 other states that do not require disclosure of basic information that helps citizens track their governors' private financial interests and possible conflicts of interest.The T-FP story also has a rather interesting quote from Gov. Bredesen - especially when you consider what comes after it: Gov. Bredesen, a multimillionaire who accepts no state salary, said he has most of his assets in a blind trust. "I'm always willing to revisit it," he said of increasing disclosure standards. "I'm in a little bit of a unique situation in that I either have a blind trust or I don't. And if you have one, it's hard to disclose."Indeed, Bredesen's 2007 disclosure does say that Qualifacts is not in Bredesen's blind trust. But Qualifacts was still in the blind trust as of April 2006, according to the disclosure Bredesen filed with the state on April 13, 2006. That disclosure indicates that his Qualifacts holdings were part of the investments managed in the blind trust: Investments held by Andrea and me are managed by Hirtle Callaghan & Co. and subject to a "blind investment" agreement. Pursuant to that agreement, we do not have knowledge of or influence over the retention, investment, re-investment or disposition of those assets. The only asset managed by Hirtle Callaghan of which I have limited knowledge and which has been publicly disclosed previously is my interest in Qualifacts Systems, Inc. .. Outside the blind trust, I am the sole shareholder in Blue Canyon Inc...To rephrase: Bredesen has a blind trust managed by Hirtle Callaghan. Qualifacts is in it, though he does have "limited knowledge" of how it is being managed, but Qualifacts is NOT "outside of the blind trust" in the way Blue Canyon Inc, - the business entity that owns Bredesen's personal jet - is. In other words, as of April 2006, Bredesen's holdings in Qualifacts were in the blind trust, but by April 2007 he had moved them out of the blind trust. Also, the Times-Free Press story appears to confirm that Bredesen made the hiring decision that moved Hickey from TennCare to Qualifacts. In April 2006, Bredesen - while serving as your governor and running for re-election - moved his TennCare director over to run a company that Bredesen owns but which was, ostensibly, in a "blind trust" that allowed Bredesen no "influence" over it. The mind boggles at how selecting a company's new CEO doesn't count as "influence" over the company and its value as an investment. The Center for Public Integrity is absolutely right to give Tennessee a failing grade.
July 26, 2007An Entrepreneurial TruthI just finished watching the new documentary The Call of the Entrepreneur, which will be released later this summer by the Acton Institute, and it is every bit as good as the trailer (see video) made it appear to be. It's the kind of documentary that Sam Davidson at Remarkablog would enjoy, judging from this post of his today titled "Be an entrepreneur or die." I just finished reading Thomas K. McCraw's short piece in the new Inc. magazine. He profiles Jospeh Schumpeter, "one of the most astute business thinkers who ever lived." I had never heard of him until this morning, but McCraw's book about him is now on my wish list.Jeff Corwnwall at the Center for Entrepreneurship in Nashville is working with Acton to schedule a Nashville screening. My short review on it is this: Economics is decreasingly taught in America's high schools, but they don't have to bring it back - they just need to show this 90-minute film. It's Economics 101 presented in highly informative, entertaining and even inspirational way. How to Make a Great CheeseburgerAnd now for something completely different... a cheeseburger recipe. Start with good ground beef - I recommend the Greenwise brand from Publix - it's beef free of antibiotics and preservatives, from cows raised without growth hormones. In other words, it's better for you than the regular ground beef. The lower the fat content of the beef the better. Mix the beef with your favorite brand of Worcestershire sauce, and sprinkle in some "Meat Magic" seasoning from Chef Paul Prudhomme's Magic Seasoning Blends" and also sprinkle in some McCormick's "Montreal Steak" seasoning. Yeah, I know McCormick's also makes a hamburger seasoning. Use the steak seasoning. Form burger patties from the mix. Grill over flame. Place burger on bun - I recommend Sara Lee Classic White Bakery Buns. Top with, in order: Spread on underside of the top bun a mix of: Consume along with your favorite beverage and some potato chips. For chips, I recommend Ruffles' Natural Sea Salted Reduced Fat Chips. The beverage choice is up to you. I had I've heard it said that the two greatest American inventions are jazz and baseball. I'd add the cheesburger to that list. There are bad cheeseburgers, of course, just like there is bad jazz and lousy baseball. But cheeseburgers done right are sublime.
July 25, 2007Blogging the NCSL Convention
The one I wish I could be in Boston for: The Media: Out With the Old, in With the New? In the Mail: Ten Tortured WordsIn the mail today: Stephen Mansfield's new book Ten Tortured Words, subtitled "How the Founding Fathers Tried to Protect Religion in America ... and What's Happened Since." Mansfield's book explains the history of the original intent of the Constitution's First Amendment - to protect religion from assault by the federal government - and how it has been subverted and the First Amendment has been misapplied in order to drive religion from American public life. Mansfield's book also points to signs of positive change on the horizon. Review coming after I finish reading it. Also, read Mansfield's recent op-ed on the same topic in USA Today. And you can learn more about Mansfield, a New York Times Best-Selling Author who happens to live in Nashville, on his website and accompanying blog. $5 Billion Earmark UpdateWhen I reported two weeks ago on an effort by U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minnesota, to pass legislation to kill the Defense Travel System, opening up a potential $5 billion in government business to Carlson Cos., a home-state company whose executives donate heavily to his campaigns, one facet of the story I didn't explore was the question of why U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Oklahoma, was co-sponsoring the same legislation. Coburn has built a well-deserved reputation as a crusader against government waste and earmarks, but new information I've received indicates his motives in this effort may also be less than sterling. A travel industry management consultant emails: The co-author with Sen. Coleman was Sen. Coburn, R - OK. One of his constituents is Sabre Holdings which has the online booking tool partnered with Carlson. Sabre spent vast sums improving its Oklahoma facility in recent years. Just Google it.I'm trying to secure a copy of that report. Update: FederalTimes.com has a copy of the report and also reports that it endorses the Defense Travel System... The Pentagon will move to require its civilian and military employees to use the Defense Travel System after an outside report won the department breathing room to fix the much-maligned system.Good for Coleman, though he and Coburn really should consider whether their previous actions on this issue open them to charges that they were pushing the legislation primarily to benefit home-state companies and wealthy campaign contributors. First Amendment, The YouTube Debate, And Fred...
July 24, 2007How to Build Media CredibilityThe Chicago Tribune considers the link between transparency and credibility and urges the news media deploy more of the former in order to increase its share of the latter. The link, and my thoughts, at Mesh Media Strategies today. Bible BloggingHere's a link to a fascinating blog I found today, thanks to the One Year Bible Blog. When I was a teenager, the church I attended encouraged all of its members to read through the Bible in one year, following a calendar that divided the Bible into 365 daily readings. I wish I'd had the One Year Bible Blog back then. Which reminds me - I'm scheduled to speak at the Society of Adventist Communicators' convention in Nashville in mid-October (brochure PDF) on the subject of blog ethics. I'm not a member of the Seventh Day Adventist denomination, but I'm happy to help them better communicate the gospel message in whatever small way I can. My talk will be titled Being Paul in the Blogosphere, a reference to the story in Acts 17:16-23 about the Apostle Paul visiting the Agora at Athens, a great marketplace of ideas that is not too unlike today's blogosphere, a free-for-all of ideas and ideologies, faiths and disbelief, and very few rules. How Paul handled himself is the model for today's Christian wanting to operate ethically and faithfully in the world of blogs and related social-media such as YouTube, MySpace, Second Life and Digg. Paul's approach to the people of Athens was ethical, transparent and bold - good strategies for the blogosphere, too. Here's the story from Acts 17:16-23: While Paul was waiting for them in Athens, he was greatly distressed to see that the city was full of idols. So he reasoned in the synagogue with the Jews and the God-fearing Greeks, as well as in the marketplace day by day with those who happened to be there. A group of Epicurean and Stoic philosophers began to dispute with him. Some of them asked, "What is this babbler trying to say?" Others remarked, "He seems to be advocating foreign gods." They said this because Paul was preaching the good news about Jesus and the resurrection. Then they took him and brought him to a meeting of the Areopagus, where they said to him, "May we know what this new teaching is that you are presenting? You are bringing some strange ideas to our ears, and we want to know what they mean." (All the Athenians and the foreigners who lived there spent their time doing nothing but talking about and listening to the latest ideas.)The Seventh Day Adventist denomination working hard to proclaim the gospel in the online world - here's patt of a recent article on the Adventist Communicator website about a church seminar in England on New Media Methods For Ministry: Last month, teenagers in Pastor Victor Hulbert's youth group put video clips of mountain boarding and other antics from a church camping trip on YouTube. They said their friends, who aren't Christian, saw the clips and were surprised that Adventists were "normal" people.What worked in evangelism 50, 30, even 15 years ago likely won't work as well today, especially in terms of reaching the younger demographics, any more than Paul would have reached the people of Athens by avoiding the Agora and dissing the Areopagus. Those iPod earbuds stuck in the under-30 age group's ears mean they aren't hearing your invite to that week-long gospel meeting, and they prefer their news, information and music in short, searchable bites that they can mix, share, mash-up and interact with. Your church isn't on YouTube and MySpace? It isn't using blog and podcasts? Chances are it isn't growing as fast and reaching as many younger people as the church down the street that is.
July 23, 2007City Paper: State Budget May Violate State Constitution
Some state budget hawks are questioning whether the state has repeatedly violated how the constitutional cap on state spending is calculated. A state attorney general’s opinion has been requested relating to the so-called Copeland Cap, written into the state constitution in 1978, and how it should be computed.Why would using revenue rather than appropriations provide a higher baseline - allowing the state budget to grow faster each year, without triggering the cap? Because almost every year the state ends the fiscal year with a surplus of revenue over the amount of state tax revenue appropriated in the official state budget. While The City Paper deserves praise for doing the story, reading it reminds me of why I prefer blogging. Reporter John Rodgers writes, "some spending watchdogs say the state constitution and law requires that state appropriations - not tax revenues - be used to calculate the baseline from which the budget can grow." The phrasing makes it sound as if the assertion is in dispute. No one who reads the state constitution and relevant state law will honestly dispute that the state constitution and relevant state law clearly and explicitly say the baseline is to be calculated using appropriations, not revenue. Article 2 Section 24 of the Tennessee constitution says: In no year shall the rate of growth of appropriations from state tax revenues exceed the estimated rate of growth of the state's economy as determined by law. No appropriation in excess of this limitation shall be made unless the General Assembly shall, by law containing no other subject matter, set forth the dollar amount and the rate by which the limit will be exceeded.All of the relevant state laws implementing that constitutional provision say the baseline is to be the current fiscal year's "appropriations from state revenues." There is no ambiguity here. Instead of couching it all in passive-voice, CYA-speak - "questions have been raised," "some observers say" - the news media should report the undeniable truth: State Treasurer Dale Sims admits the Bredesen administration has been using total revenues rather than appropriations from state revenues as its baseline (see video), and that the constitution and state law unequivocally say the baseline must be calculated based on appropriations from state tax revenues. Report the facts - and let the chips fall where they may. The Call of the EntrepreneurI'm rather looking forward to seeing the new documentary The Call of the Entrepreneur when it is released later this year - and not just because my cousin wrote the script. Arnold Kling at TCS Daily calls it "the most subversive film I have seen" and "a threat to tyranny everywhere, including here at home." Jeff Corwnwall at the Center for Entrepreneurship in Nashville wrote on his blog recently that he is trying to arrange a screening here. I'll keep you posted.
July 22, 2007The Truth Is...Penelope Trunk, a writer for the leftwing The Huffington Post who also writes a regular column for the Boston Globe, says journalists are supposed to misquote people because "the journalist gets paid to tell her own stories," and "journalists who think they are telling 'the truth' don't understand the truth. We each have our own truth." The truth is, Ms. Trunk, that there IS truth and if your "truth" isn't actually true then it is fiction, no matter how badly you want to believe it, and if you intentionally spread fiction as "truth" then you are just a liar.
July 21, 2007Harper's Versus the BloggersBlackFive takes a hatchet to an attack by Harper's magazine on bloggers. "You're not a real journalist" is his way of saying "only professionals like me should be allowed to talk to high officials, not uncredentialed folks like you." This is about protecting the idea that "the press" has a special status or stature, and that mere bloggers or citizens do not deserve access to important people. That should be reserved for the journalists, the gatekeepers of our Republic.It's always amusing when representatives of the Journalistic Club lash out at bloggers who are doing journalistic work. It's clear that one group is worried and the other is having fun. On Harry PotterHarry Potter and the Deathly Tax-and-Spend Democrats - at Elephantbiz.com.
July 20, 2007Iraq UpdateWith Tennessee's U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander recently proposed that the White House and Congress "come together" on a way out of Iraq by implementing the Iraq Study Group recommendations, it's worth your time to watch this 30-minute video of Iraq Study Group member Edwin Meese III being interviewed about the ISG recommendations and the Iraq war by Hoover Institution research fellow Peter Robinson. Is Alexander right? Or is the ISG plan really just a plan for American surrender in Iraq?
July 19, 2007Surging ChinaChina's annual economic growth surged to an 11- year high of 11.9 percent in the second quarter, a stunning number that puts China on course to chalk up its straight fifth year of double-digit economic growth and to overtake Germany as the world's third-biggest economy perhaps as soon as this year. Reuters has the details. For perspective on what China's rapid economic growth - and India's - means for the United States, check out the Uncommon Knowledge interview with Michael Spence, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and Philip H. Knight Professor Emeritus of Management in the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University. Spence is Chairman of an independent Commission on Growth and Development, focusing on growth in developing countries. Tennessee MSM Continues to Ignore Bredesen Administration's Flagrant Violation of Key State Constitution Budget Provision
Except for a mention this morning by WKRN political blogger A.C. Kleinheider on VolunteerVoters.com, and some other mentions on his blog previously, the state's mainstream media has ignored the story for more than a month. I first reported on June 13 that state Treasurer Dale Sims had admitted under questioning by Rep. Lynn on the House floor during the final days of the legislative session that the administration of Gov. Phil Bredesen had calculated the 2007-08 budget's Copeland Cap number using the previous budget year's total state tax revenue as the baseline, rather than on the appropriations from state tax revenue, as both the state constitution and relevant state laws clearly require. Sims even admitted the administration has been doing this for years. (See video.) Potential cost to taxpayers over the years is in the billions of dollars, but the Tennessee news media remains silent. Perhaps they realize that reporting the story will reveal, embarrassingly, that they failed miserably for years to properly and accurately cover the budget process. The Nothing StoryThe "Fred Thompson Was a Pro-Choice Lobbyist!" story fizzles to a dispiriting end (for Democrats) as his billing records back up Thompson's version of the story. Ed Morrissey at Captain's Quarters has the details... We can expect the billing records to make a big splash in the blogosphere. However, a few points should be noted. Fred Thompson made it clear that he never represented this group as a lobbyist, and that he never lobbied John Sununu on their behalf. Sununu verified Thompson's denial. Thompson never denied nor confirmed that he provided some consultation on their behalf through Arent Fox, saying that he could not recall either way.Pfft. That's the sound of the air going out of this left/media/democratic attack on Thompson. Remember, Thompson's record in the U.S. Senate on the abortion issue was 100 percent pro-life. And those who are trying to portray him as pro-baby killing are in fact pro-baby killing themselves and don't want the GOP to select a pro-life presidential nominee. As one commenter at CQ reminds us, "the same drive-by media that is attempting to paint Fred Thomspon durring this primary season as somewhat sympathetic to abortion, will attack him for his opposition to 'a woman's right to choose' during the general election."
July 18, 2007Challenging the Bredesen Administration on Its Copeland Cap Violations
As I reported here on June 13, State Treasurer Dale Sims admitted under questioning by Rep. Lynn on the House floor during the final days of the legislative session that the administration of Gov. Phil Bredesen had calculated the 2007-08 budget's Copeland Cap number using the previous budget year's total state tax revenue as the baseline, rather than on the appropriations from state tax revenue in the 2006-08 budget. (See video at right.) The clear language of both the state constitution and all relevant statutes all say "appropriations" are to be the baseline. Sims claims the state has for years been using revenue rather than appropriations as the baseline. In signing the budget into law, Gov. Bredesen may have signed into law an unconstitutional state budget. Here is the text of Rep. Lynn's letter to AG Cooper: Dear General Cooper:The request may put Cooper in a tight spot - after all, he was appointed by the governor. Also, my sources tell me a lawsuit is in the works that will challenge the constitutionality of the 2007-08 budget and the use of appropriations rather than revenue to calculate the Copeland Cap baseline. Over the BackfenceI'm writing about hyperlocal journalism vs. citizen journalism, and the failure of Backfence.com, over at Mesh Media Strategies. Click here for the latest.
July 16, 2007Betting on the Wrong Horse?Is Tennessee about to bet $70 million of the taxpayers' money on the wrong horse? While the state of Tennessee is preparing to spend some $70 million in taxpayers' money subsidizing an effort to develop an ethanol industry based on switchgrass - an unproven technology not yet ready for commercialization - the state of Georgia has just issued a construction permit to Range Fuels, a Colorado company that has what it says is a commercially feasible way to produce ethanol from a wide variety of other biomass. Details today at Ecotality. This Site For Sale?I got an email the other day asking me if I would sell this domain name, billhobbs.com. I said I would start to consider it at $150,000. If you owned your own name as a web domain name would you ever sell it? Backfence DownMy latest post at Mesh Media Strategies looks at the impending demise of Backfence.com.
July 15, 2007Walnut Street Bridge, Chattanooga
More Photos From My Recent Trip to DCThe first three of these photos were taken at dusk, July 3, from the rooftop of the new Newseum under construction on Pennsylvania Avenue.
This is the view looking up from where we sat on the floor for about an hour during a severe-weather alert that cause the National Park Police to close access to the National Mall on July 4th while a severe storm with a possible tornado moved through the area. I'm not sure being in glass-enclosed box with airplanes hanging over our heads would have been safer than being out in the open if a twister hit but, hey, if you're going to die in a tornado, better to die crushed by a World War 2 fighter plane or an old USSR nuclear rocket, or the capsule that brought the first astronauts back from the moon, then underneath the remains of a mobile home, I guess.
July 13, 2007Adventures in the Land of LincolnThe Hoover Institution has posted another interesting video, a half-hour interview with author Andrew Ferguson regarding his new book, "Land of Lincoln: Adventure's in Abe's America," published by Atlantic Monthly Press. Ferguson is a senior editor at The Weekly Standard and has written for The New Yorker, the New Republic, The Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal and many other media. Ferguson, interviewed by Hoover Institution fellow Peter Robinson, discusses how various interest groups have tried to mold Lincoln's image into their own agenda, and how - and why - America can and should recapture the "large" and universal Lincoln. Watch it here in the small box, or larger here at Google Video. You can purchase the book at the Amazon link or here Small Town NewsInteresting public records access story in the Cookeville, Tennessee, Herald Citizen today: "An Internet journalist who says he was denied access to public records in Livingston has filed a court petition asking a judge to order that access." Read the story carefully and note that while the city attorney insists OvertonJournal.com publisher Joseph Edwards was not denied access to public records, the county attorney very noticeably doesn't deny the second part of Edwards' allegation - that he was told he could have access to the court records only if he agreed to let a judge pre-screen his stories before publication.
July 12, 2007Who?Dan Riehl at Riehl World View asks an important question. Villagers to Soros: Mind Your Own Business!Billionaire and Democratic and liberal causes benefactor George Soros so badly wants to protect the poor people of rural Romania from a gold mine that will improve their standards of living that his Open Society Institute opened an office in the village of Rosia Montana, Romania, to fight the proposed gold mine. Results: The people of the village are now protesting loudly. Not against the proposed mine. Against Soros and his allies who wish to stop the mine. Gheorghe Luchian, star of the documentary Mine Your Own Business, has the details and a video link on his blog Report from Rosia. 100 Percent Against EarmarksThe National Taxpayers Union has posted the pictures of every member of Congress who has voted for every amendment proposed by U.S. Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Arizona, to strike earmarks from appropriations bills. Four Tennessee members of congress made the list. Wonderful and Crooked
Both sides had been filing motions to limit or exclude certain testimony in the case as late as Monday. Among other things, Sen. Crutchfield's attorneys wanted to exclude a secretly recorded tape in which his administrative assistant, Linda Johnson, told an undercover FBI operative about a "wonderful and crooked" way to get money into state political campaigns.Is Crutchfield pleading guilty to protect the Tennessee Democratic Party from revelation of its "wonderful and crooked" way to raise money for political campaigns? Will the Tennessee Registry of Election Finance, the Tennessee Ethics Commission, or the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation now demand to hear the whole recording, and probe to find out the details? Here's hoping the federal prosecutors in the Crutchfield case release the recording. The public has the right to know all there is to know about this "wonderful and crooked" fund-raising scheme. Hat tip: Tennessee Politics Blog. A $5 Billion Earmark?In late March of this year, just three weeks after filing legislation that would largely kill a government program established just 10 years ago to help the Department of Defense reduce waste in its mammoth travel expenditures, U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minnesota, received $8,200 in campaign contributions from the Minnesota power couple that includes the CEO of Carson Wagonlit Travel, one of America's largest travel corporations. If passed, Coleman's legislation would make an additional $5 billion worth of government travel spending potentially available to Carson Wagonlit, which is part of The Carlson Cos., based in Minneapolis, Minn. Coleman's home state. Carlson is one of America's largest private corporations with reported sales of $37.1 billion in 2006. Carlson brands include Radisson Hotels, casual dining chain TGI Friday's, Regent Seven Seas Cruises, Carlson Leisure Group (travel agencies) and Carlson Wagonlit Travel, a business travel management firm. Carlson also owns CW Government Travel, which provides travel management for some departments of the federal government. In June, Carlson announced that CW Government Travel had won a U.S. Department of Justice contract to provide 'E-Gov Travel Services' and would manage all of DOJ's travel needs, 'including planning and authorization, approvals, reservations, vouchers, and reporting.' Carlson already provides similar services to the U.S. Department of Education, the State Department, the General Services Administration headquarters, the Department of Labor, the National Business Center, and a number of other federal agencies. Carlson estimated the DOJ contract to be worth $43 million. That's a nice little contract for Carson Wagonlit, which did $20.5 billion in sales in 2006, but that DOJ contract is not the big fish that Carson is trying to catch. Carlson has its eye on the U.S. Department of Defense - which spends more on travel than the rest of the federal government combined. And that's where Sen. Coleman comes in. The Defense Department is the biggest single purchaser of travel services in the federal government, accounting for more than half of the nearly $11 billion that Uncle Sam spends on official government travel. As you can imagine, Carlson - America's largest travel agency - would love to get some of that more than $5 billion in potential business. But they can't. In 1997, during the Clinton Administration, investigative reports found large-scale waste in the Defense Department's system of administering travel, and the Defense Department launched a program to create an automated on-line Defense Travel System to drastically reduce the overhead costs of administering the 'back-office' functions associated with manually processing and paying travel vendors and travelers' vouchers, as well as to properly account for travel expenses through various auditing and control functions. Up to that point, Defense employees traveling on official business could book their own travel through a travel agency, then turn in the receipts for reimbursement. In addition, the DTS would consolidate into one system the nearly three dozen different - and incompatible - travel systems then operated by different branches and agencies within the military. (A more recent study estimated that the Defense Department wasted $100 million in 2004 on unused airline tickets purchased by or for Defense travelers that were never nor submitted for refunds because the department lacks a system to identify unused tickets in the process of reconciling travel reimbursement claims.) In 1998, DOD contracted BDM Corporation to build the Defense Travel System, which was to be an online, automated system that handled both the 'front end' of making travel arrangements and reservations and the back end of payments and the accounting and auditing. BDM was later acquired by TRW, which itself was acquired by Northrop Grumman, which now is overseeing completion of the DTS. Today, the Defense Travel System is in use at all of the 281 major military installations that account for the vast bulk of Defense travel, and has been deployed to more than 8,100 of the approximately 11,000 remaining U.S. military facilities and sites. And usage of the system is rising - the DTS has processed 3 million travel vouchers since its launch, including 2 million vouchers and 2.4 million travel authorizations in the last year. While Defense has been developing the unique DTS system for handling its travel booking, voucher processing, accounting and auditing needs, the General Services Administration pursued a different approach to providing automated travel booking to the civilian Federal agencies. Federal civilian agencies are authorized to use one of three vendors certified by the General Services Administration to provide automated travel booking services. Those vendors are Carlson Travel, American Express, and Northrop Grumman, the builder of the DTS. The Defense Travel System is not without its critics. Over the years, the Government Accountability Office has issued two reports on the DTS; the DOD Inspector General has reviewed the program, and the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (chaired by Sen. Coleman until the Democrats took control of the Senate in January) has also issued a report. Each of those reports has identified different flaws and short-comings in the DTS, which remains a work-in-progress. In March, Sen. Coleman filed legislation, which would eliminate the travel booking functions of the DTS and encourage the Department of Defense to instead use travel agents - such as those who work at various Carlson Travel franchises, for example - to identify flights, hotels and rental car options. Defense travelers would gather their own travel reservations information, then input that info into the back-end portion of the DTS. But instead of letting Northrop Grumman complete work on the DTS - on which more than $400 million has already been spent - Coleman proposes to scrap it, and go back to the old, wasteful, system of letting Defense employees book their own official travel through whatever travel agency they happen to find in the Yellow Pages. More often than not they're likely to be dialing the number of a Carlson travel agency. Coleman titled his legislation, S. 754, the 'Defense Travel Simplification Act of 2007' - but allowing Defense employees to book their own travel was one of the reasons why the Defense Department's official travel budget was riddled with waste. (More recently, Sen. Coleman filed an amendment to the pending Department of Defense spending authorization bill that would do much the same thing as S. 754.) Northrop Grumman, answering critics of the DTS program last year, said that the DTS is projected to save $178 million in productivity costs and $56 million in real dollars each year when fully deployed by the end of this year. Scrapping it and switching to one of the 'eTravel' services used by the civilian agencies 'would forego about $25 million of the conservatively estimated $56 million in annual savings that DTS would produce,' Northrop Grumman contends. Before you dismiss that as spin from a company that doesn't want to lose access to a government gravy train, remember this: Northrop Grumman is one of three GSA-certified eTravel vendors. It could potentially make more money if Defense switched to eTravel and selected Northrop Grumman's GovTrip system as its eTravel vendor. Says Northrop Grumman: Halting DTS development would be the wasteful discard of a $400 million investment by taxpayers in an existing, operational, effective system before its benefits have been fully realized while spending an additional $40 million to $65 million per year using eTravel, which does not meet the Defense Department's security and interface requirements.So, if scrapping the DTS wouldn't actually save taxpayers money, why is Sen. Coleman so determined to do it? Is it because he's facing a tough re-election fight next year and wants to grandstand as a friend of taxpayers and a foe of government waste? Perhaps. It's a pretty standard political pose in an election year. But there are plenty of better examples of real government waste, so why is Coleman so fixated on the DTS, a program that, when fully implemented, is designed to save taxpayers money? Consider this: Northrop Grumman's DTS gives it a monopoly over more than half of Uncle Sam's total spending on travel, while its GovTrip system competes with Carlson (and American Express) for the less than half of total federal government spending on travel that remains. Carlson is America's largest travel agency, but more than $5 billion in annual travel bookings by the federal government is slipping beyond its reach as more and more Defense employees are switched on to the DTS. (Carlson hates the DTS so much that a few years ago it filed a lawsuit - later dismissed - alleging Northrop Grumman got the contract unfairly.) Since 2001, more than $65,000 in Carlson-connected money has flowed into Sen. Coleman's campaign coffers. Helping Carlson by striving to earmark $5 billion in business for them to compete for is a pretty nice payback. Or perhaps there is no connection between those campaign contributions and Coleman's crusade to cancel the DTS. Perhaps he really is just out to battle government waste and thinks there are better alternatives to the DTS. Still, filing legislation to kill the program - and soon thereafter getting big campaign contributions from major campaign benefactors who stand to benefit from that legislation - looks a lot more like a senator using his legislative power to benefit big campaign contributors and a big home-state employer at the expense of the U.S. taxpayer. That's the kind of behavior that cost Republicans their majority in the last election. Update: Minnesota Campaign Report says comedian and failed liberal talk show host Al Franken is raising serious cash for his campaign to unseat Coleman. The Politico says Franken out-raised Coleman - by a wide margin in the second quarter.
July 9, 2007The Legalities of WarHere's video of an interesting discussion between two constitutional law professors about the legal issues in the War on Terror, featuring Richard Epstein of the University of Chicago Law School and John Yoo of the University of California-Berkeley School of Law. The discussion is moderated by Peter Robinson of the Hoover Institution.
July 8, 2007The UnFairness DoctrineJohn Seigenthaler looks at the push from Senate Democrats to revive the "Fairness Doctrine" for radio, in a commentary in the Sunday Tennessean. This concept of a "Fairness Doctrine" is a flawed federal policy relic from early days of radio when the Federal Communications Commission decided to force broadcast owners to air opposing viewpoints.Read the whole thing.
July 6, 2007Buh Bye NashvilleIsTalking.com?WKRN Channel 2 in Nashville is apparently no longer committed to the blogosphere in the way it was when Mike Sechrist was the station's general manager. I have a look at the situation at Mesh Media Strategies, and a business-model comparison to The City Paper's new Nashville City Blogs.
July 5, 2007Reflecting Freedom
Update: Glenn Reynolds posted yesterday about severe storms causing the National Parks Service to clear the National Mall on July 4th and send people into nearby government buildings for shelter. I was touring the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum with my family and we were among those kept inside the building for more than 90 minutes until the severe storms passed. The Air and Space Museum faces the National Mall - the broad and long expanse of grass between the Washington Monument and the Capitol Building - but the back side of the museum faces a parallel street that isn't governed by the National Park Service. So, while the Park Service was herding people off the mall and into the front doors of the museum, and preventing people from leaving through those doors, people were free to exit the back doors - which lead to the odd experience of sitting inside for shelter and safety and seeing hundreds of people passing by on the street outside. Given that where we needed to go was on the other side of the National Mall, which was "closed" until the storms passed, we opted to stay until the all-clear. It should be mentioned that the Park Police didn't do much to inform the crowds stuck in the Air and Space Museum about why they weren't be allowed to exit the building on to the National Mall. If you weaved your way to the front and asked, they'd tell you, but nobody used the public address system to make a general announcement - and it would've been easy as a unit from the the Air Force band had set up to play a small concert in the main atrium of the museum and, in fact, did play between 6 and 7 p.m. Another thing: The Air and Space Museum atrium is not the safest place to be if there's a threat of a tornado. It's basically a glass box - walls and ceiling are all windows. And there are big airplanes hanging from the girders. And big rockets standing on the floor. If the tornadoes had come close, I'd have preferred taking my chances out in the open.
Update: I met Ben Sargent, editorial cartoonist for the Austin American-Statesman, briefly at a dinner at the Canadian Embassy on the evening of July 4th. Sargent is one of my all-time favorite editorial cartoonists. You can see his work here. Sargent's son Sam, a university student and Congressional intern, was with him - and looked for all the world like he could be the twin brother of Drew Johnson of the Tennessee Center for Policy Research. I wish I had snapped a picture, but I didn't.
July 2, 2007The Hill
|
|||||||||||