![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« A Close Call | Main | Boom! » June 30, 2007Bredesen Breaks Oath of Office, Violates Constitition By Signing Unconstitutional Budget Into Law
That's because the budget he signed into law is blatantly, inarguably and utterly in violation of the state constitution - and the administration knows it. The State Treasurer admitted that the state doesn't adhere to the plain language of the constitution regarding the growth of spending each year (see video). The budget Bredesen signed into law contains almost $670 million in illegal spending - about $110 for every man, woman and child in the state. By signing the budget into law, Gov. Bredesen has, in effect, sanctioned the illegal taking of nearly $450 from each and every typical family of four. That's the bad news. The good news is that now that Bredesen has signed the budget into law, as of July 1 when it goes into effect every single taxpayer in Tennessee will the legal standing to sue the government to block implementation of the unconstitutional budget and the illegal spending. Here's hoping somebody does. And here's an offer to the Bredesen administration: Have your legal counsel read this, watch the embedded video, review the state constitution and the applicable statutory law, and then write something explaining why the administration believes the budget isn't unconstitutional, and I'll publish it here, verbatim. Posted in Tennessee Government News
Comments
Thank you Bill Hobbs for staying on the case. Here's wishing I had the gazillion dollars to push that lawsuit but I don't! Maybe John Jay Hooker will take up the challenge. Posted by: MR Freedom at July 2, 2007 3:03 PMHow much would it cost to challenge this and see it through the whole process? Posted by: Danny L. Newton at July 2, 2007 5:57 PMIt will be interesting to see how the state treats the monies collected for the tollway fund. According to the way the legislation was written, it is the legislature's intention that all of the monies for the tollway fund are to go into and out of a separate fund. It might be interesting to see if the Supreme Court would think it proper that these expenditures, probably $270 million are exempt from the spending cap. Theoretically, there is no commingling of funds. Why not have your readers write their state representatives about this issue and include a linke to that person's email address???? Lets get this thing (impeachment of Bredesen) going!!!!! Thanks, Posted by: Terry Seaman at July 23, 2007 8:46 AMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||