![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Profiling Campfield 2 | Main | Sheryl Crow Solves Global Warming » April 23, 2007How Green is My Tennessee Valley Authority?
UPDATE: I have received clarifying information from TVA spokesman Gilbert Francis and am extensively updating this post. Francis: "The AP story that shows TVA's green power use going down is absolutely wrong." Last week, representing the Ecotality blog, I emailed TVA's news media contacts and asked for data about its Green Power Switch and Generation Partners programs. TVA provided me the data - and also apparently issued a press release which resulted in an AP story out today. TVA's power-service area covers 80,000 square miles in the southeastern United States, including almost all of Tennessee and parts of Mississippi, Kentucky, Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia. In all, TVA power serves more than 8.7 million customers. Green Power Switch is a TVA program which allows customers of participating power distributors to purchase blocks of "green" power generated from wind or methane, for an extra $4 per 150-kilowatt-hour block. Green Power Switch is offered by 98 of TVA's 158 power distributors across a broad area of the southern United States. Generation Partners is a TVA program which allows customers of participating power distributors to sell back to TVA any "green" power they generate from their own solar panels or wind-turbines. In the AP story today TVA spokesman Gilbert Francis says TVA sold 69 percent of its green power from March 2006 to February 2007. According to numbers Francis provided me via email late last week, the Green Power Switch program currently has 9,845 residential customers and 484 commercial customers - that's less than one percent of the 8.7 million total residential and commercial cusomters served by TVA (through its distributors). Francis says TVA currently sells 45,747 blocks of green power per month. Those 45,747 blocks of green power equal 6,862,050 kilowatt-hours, or 6.86 megawatt-hours. Francis says TVA's maximum generation capacity for Green Power Switch is 37.5 megawatts, and "less than 1 percent of TVA's power generation capacity is green power." (A megawatt or kilowatt is not the same as a megawatt-hour or a kilowatt-hour. A kilowatt-hour is a unit of energy equivalent to one kilowatt of power expended for one hour of time. So, while Green Power Switch's maximum power generation capacity is 37.5 megawatts, at any given time it often is less than that due to cloud cover affecting solar, lack of wind for the wind turbines, etc.) The bottom line is that TVA's green power customers currently purchase about 69 percent of the "green" power that TVA generates. "The participation in Green Power Switch is going up," Francis said. "It is growing over time." The AP story says TVA "used to sell more renewable energy than it could produce, but now that situation has reversed." Francis explained that in the beginning there was more demand for green power than TVA had generating capacity, but recently TVA's green power production capacity increased with the addition of 15 more wind turbines at its Buffalo Mountain wind energy farm. I also sought data on TVA's Generation Partners program - which allows customers to sell "green" power to TVA. Francis said TVA's maximum power production capacity from its Generation Partners is 0.18 megawatts. TVA's total power production capacity from all sources - hydroelectric plants, nuclear plants, coal-fired power plants and "green" sources - is almost 35,000 megawatts. Update: The largest single purchaser of "green power" from TVA is Middle Tennessee State University, buying 55,000 blocks - 8.25 megawatt-hours - annually. The figure comes from a story in Sidelines, the MTSU campus newspaper, which was reporting how students at the University of Memphis has followed MTSU's lead in endorsing a new student fee that would pay for renewable energy and other environmental projects Also, the Knoxville News Sentinel reports that students at the University of Chattanooga have likewise voted to pay an additional fee to buy "green power" from TVA, to fund recyling efforts on campus and to pay to install energy-efficient lightbulbs. Charging students an extra fee to pay for installing energy-efficient lightbulbs - compact flourescent lightbulbs, no doubt - is clever way to use rising environmental concerns to rip off students. CFLs will save the university money over time - probably a lot of money given the sheer number of lightbulbs on a university campus. No university should charge its students an extra fee to do something that not only is good for the environment but will save the university money too. Posted in Ecotality.com/blog
Comments
This is some interesting data, and was something I was wondering too. Who knew you could just email them and they would actually tell you? Well, first off your conversion between MWH and KWH is off, there are 1000 KWH per MWH, not 1,000,000 like you seem to suggest. However this doesn't seem to throw you off since the comparisons are all done in the same base. Also, TVAs peak number of "37.5MW" is only when the wind is blowing full speed and the sun is at its zenith. The average power is what matters and is considerably less, Buffalo Mountian has about a 28% capacity factor and the solar installations are probably around the same. So, the average generation is only a fraction of peak. Also, the "donwturn" mentioned in some places in terms of demand is not true, deman has continually risen, however supply has risen even faster so they are now running a deficit. Also, several other schools have voted to buy green power, and large customers like these will soon make up for the deficit in demand. Given the cosiderable amount of attention global warming has gotten these past few years I would expect that this deficit will likely be erased in only a year or so. Posted by: Alex Brown at April 24, 2007 6:52 AMOne thing I do not understand is why Hydroelectric is not considered Green energy? This is distinctly renewable and to my knowledge produces almost zero pollutants. As for your comment "No university should charge its students an extra fee to do something that not only is good for the environment but will save the university money too." This is laughable. With three college students in our family, we are continuously barraged by examples of higher education charging students for things that make them money. The biggest one of all is the year abroad program. Wouldn't you like to be able to increase your customer revenues by 25% over the number of customers you actually service? Regards Posted by: Michael Seifert at April 24, 2007 7:59 AMMy understanding is that the organization that accredits the Green Power Switch program only considers small/low-impact hydro as "green," and the existing large-scale dams that create hydro for TVA would presumably not qualify. Hydro is generally Posted by: Rachel at April 24, 2007 12:54 PMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||