![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Wiggle Room | Main | While Bredesen Talks Tough, Bryson Proposes "Strictest Immigration Laws in the Nation" » October 3, 2006Let's Give Them Something To Talk AboutOnline Media Daily reports on a survey commissioned by Lexis Nexis that found consumers are more likely to turn to the mainstream media when they want information about urgent matters than to blogs, podcasts or Web-only publications. But will newspapers be around much longer for consumers to turn to? Jeff Jarvis thinks that's unlikely unless they figure out ways to innovate in a crisis. The big problem with newspapers, as I see it, is that they tell you each morning what happened yesterday - which is a service of decreasing value in the world of 24/7 cable news and high-speed Internet. Traditional broadcast media is better at telling you what is happening now, but tends to be short on in-depth analysis and long on "Ooh! Look at that!" video voyeurism. Online media can match or even beat the immediacy of broadcast - unlike TV it isn't limited to a certain number of channels - and the virtually unlimited pixels and cheap bandwidth of the Internet, compared to the limited "news hole" of a newspaper, provides unlimited room for analysis, commentary and in-depth coverage that newspapers simply don't have the room to provide. Online media also has one other advantage that print and broadcast can't match: Interactivity. A newspaper story may spark a conversation in the community - "Hey Martha, did you see what the mayor did!" - but neither newspapers nor broadcast media actively facilitate the community conversation, nor publish much of it beyond printing or airing a few "man on the street" reaction quotes. Interactive online media, on the other hand, facilitates the conversation. In some cases, it becomes the conversation, as the "consumers" of news become the producers of commentary, analysis and sometimes news itself, publishing via blogs and video blogs and podcasts. Will newspapers survive? Not if they keep doing what they've been doing for decades. But the news organizations that produce them can survive and thrive, by implementing the best attributes of broadcast and online media - immediacy, depth, and facilitating community conversation - and by remembering that the key part of the word "newspaper" isn't paper. Posted in Journalism & Media
Comments
Check out this great trail my friend posted on trailfire.com about how to find great daily news! Here is the link I haven't subscribed to a newspaper in about 5 or 6 years. The reason I quit is that more and more I was finding the editorial page and the front page as one and the same. I couldn't get just as "accurate as humanly possible" coverage of a newsworthy event - plus I had to be told what it meant to me, and very seldom did it mean what I was told it should mean to me, and I was later to find out that some key facts had been intentionally omitted because they didn't fit the political agenda of the newspaper. Quite frankly, I didn't find value in any newspaper since they should have really been called a "propagandapapers" Now my money, that used to go for a newspaper subscription, goes for a high-speed Internet connection, and I can go research current events to my hearts content. Posted by: Vulgorilla at October 3, 2006 5:28 PMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||