About | Portfolio | Backup | Archives | PayPal Tip Jar | Amazon Tip Jar | Shop@Amazon
Advertising


Search BillHobbs.com
Stats, Etc.


TTLB Ecosystem Stats
Powered by FeedBurner


« Fall Creek Falls | Main | Silence! »

September 4, 2006

Latest Attack on Nashville Property Tax Referendum Proposal Falls Flat

The Tennessean continues to attack the proposed Nashville city charter change that would give voters referendum power to approve or reject property tax rate increases. The latest salvo: a Gail Kerr column pointing out that even if voters approve the charter change, some property owners' property taxes will still increase every four years, thanks to state-mandated citywide property reappraisals. And Kerr is right - but she presents only part of the picture. She writes:

Frustration leading to this vote bubbled up because Nashville mayors have passed property tax hikes on top of reappraisals. It's kind of a sneaky way to make the tax hike not look so bad, and it's killing people in hot real estate markets. They got hit with a double whammy tax hike.

In a nutshell: Metro must, by law, reappraise every property every four years to make sure it is listed on the tax rolls at fair market value. Cities aren't allowed to raise more revenue during a reappraisal. So the property tax rate is adjusted down to account for all those homes that went up in value.

"If the average value increase was 25 percent, but your home's value went up by 40 percent, then your property tax bill will be higher," Cardwell explained.

Kerr is right that even if the charter change passes and voters never approve a property tax rate increase, some property owners (residential AND commercial) will face higher tax bills, if their property's value increased more than the average.

But what Kerr doesn't tell her readers is that property owners whose property value increased LESS than the average would get a tax CUT thanks to the reappraisal process. And that's fair - property taxes are a flat rate based on property values, so if my property value increased faster than yours my tax bill ought to rise relative to yours.

If you read between the lines, Kerr's attack on the proposed charter change actually helps supporters of giving voters referendum power over property tax-rate increases. For, although she doesn't come right out and say it, Kerr's column admits that the city of Nashville will still see property tax revenue rise even if voters never approve another rate increase. Here's why: People continue to build new residential real estate - homes, condos, apartments, duplexes and such - and commercial real estate - industrial buildings, stores, office buildings, etc. - in Nashville. Each one of them adds to the tax base. And as re-appraisals every four years result in a lower tax rate, Nashville will become an increasingly attractive place for people to invest in real estate, whether by building or by buying existing properties. The result of that is easy to predict: Demand will drive up both prices and supply, which means higher property values in existing properties, more new properties being added to the tax base - both generating more tax revenue for the city without a property tax rate increase.

Posted in Nashville

Comments

I had to make a conscious effort not to be offended. I kept wondering if she really believed that we signed the petition without understanding what we were signing.

Posted by: Kay Brooks at September 4, 2006 8:36 PM

I know in KVille re appraisals have to be revenue neutral. I thought this was made a state wide thing. I think this is how Corker was able to say property taxes in Chattanooga are the lowest since the 50s or whatever. The property was re appraised up and the taxes went down.

Posted by: the Rep at September 5, 2006 9:15 AM

That's statewide, Rep - reappraisals must be revenue-neutral in the aggregate for all properties that existed at the prior reappraisal four years earlier.

So if the tax rate is $1.00 and the average property value doubled (rose 100 percent), they would cut the tax rate in half so that the revenue would be the same.

Total revenue still rises because of new properties built since the last reappraisal four years earlier, and also because of properties that have been "improved" in the interim.

What happens in Metro is usually that the metro council lowers the rate to adjust for the reappraisal, then passes a rate increase. So the $1.00 rate in our example drops to $0.50, then the council raises it to $0.75 and claims that the tax rate is lower - yet people's tax bills still go up.

The proposed charter change that will be on the ballot for Nashville voters in November simply says that the tax rate can not be raised without voter approval, same as the local-option sales tax rate.

If voters in our hypothetical scenario said "NO", the tax rate would stay at $0.50, but the city would still have more revenue due to new development and construction of residential and commercial properties.

Posted by: Bill Hobbs at September 5, 2006 9:35 AM
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!









Remember personal info?






Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




back to top
Advertising

Video
Palin Acceptance Speech

McCain Acceptance Speech

I Also Blog At...
button-fcs-blog.gif
Archives
Blogroll