![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Rochelle Fogger | Main | Info Dump » September 13, 2006Election Finance Registry Fails to Investigate Rep. Rinks' Questionable Campaign Spending
From the desk of Ted G. CookI haven't seen the actual campaign finance filings from Rep. Rinks (photo), so I'm taking Cook's and Dennis' word as to the facts outlined in Cooks' sworn complaint. If they are as described, the Tennessee Registry of Election Finance is nothing short of derelict in its duty to investigate. Dennis emails that Cook's complaint was heard today, and dismissed by the Tennessee Registry of Election Finance. Says Dennis, "Mr. Cook advised me that the board said they couldn't do anything unless he could show some sort of fraud to them, despite the obvious deficiency in the filings and their duty to investigate. I was relatively sure this would happen, but it still irritates me to no end." Me too, Mr. Dennis. I'll forward this blog article to Rep. Rinks and gladly bring to you his response, if any. I'll also be forwarding it to Trent Seibert. UPDATE: You can read Rinks' campaign donations and expenditure reports here - just enter his last name, the year and the type of report you wish to view. You can't download the report as a PDF file directly, but if you Adobe's PDF distiller program, you can create a PDF file by "printing" the web page to your distiller program instead of your printer. Here are his 2003 campaign expenditures, his 2004 campaign expenditures and his 2005 campaign expenditures, all referenced in the sworn complaint, and his campaign expenditures so far in 2006. I didn't spot anything highly odd in his 2006 campaign expenditures, though I do wonder why he returned $500 in contributions from Wright Bros. Construction, a Charleston, TN-based road-builder. UPDATE: State Rep. Stacey Campfield blogs about Rinks' questionable expenditures: One of the Nashville TV stations did a story about it back when the ethics wars were going on .When asked to disclose what he was paying for on the card he refused to tell. I know the with the City Club you pay for the food you eat at the club (No, I am not a member). If the food was eaten while in session or when the legislator collected per diem that should not be double billed.Read the rest of Campfield's blog post here. Posted in Tennessee Government News
Comments
This state house seat is probably the most GOP seat thats held by a Democrat west of Nashville. Hardin and McNairy counties even went for John Wilder's last two GOP opponents.... Hardin even went for Jim Cooper's 1992 GOP Congressional opponent. So if Mr. Dennis campaigns hard then he's got a great shot I think. Rinks has voted for every tax increase thats come down the pike since he replaced the late GOP State Rep. Mr. Wolfe, even Naifeh's income tax. Good luck Mr Dennis! Posted by: brent at September 13, 2006 4:24 PMBill, I was sitting there (in the same room) when the Board of the Tennessee Registry of Election Finance dismissed Vance Dennis' sworn complaint against Rep. Randy Rinks. Even though Mr Dennis was obviously very angry over the dismissal, he maintained his composure and handled himself as a gentleman (better than I would have handled myself). While I was there on a different matter and wasn't paying 100% attention to his case, I believe that the reasoning for the dismissal was twofold: 1 - He was not able to bring - develop - present enough information to 'tip the scales' towards investigation. 2 - Some of the questionable behavior Mr. Dennis brought to the board happened before it was technically a violation under the new ethics laws. I'm a soldier, not a lawyer and I didn't quite understand all the falderall going on there in relation to the Dennis/Rinks case, but I think I'd better bone up on the procedures. I have my show against Rep Mary Pruitt next month, since she and her lawyer delayed her 'rendezvous with destiny' until next month. One of the board members actually said about her delay tactics: "We're being sandbagged, here." Another one said "She's trying to delay this until after the election." So that gives me hope they can see through Representative Pruitt's smokescreen. I guess we'll find out next month! Posted by: Jim Boyd at September 14, 2006 6:39 AMHe also was against every open records bill, ethics bill and illegal immigration bill that you can think of. (unless you count a bill to give illegals drivers licences - he was for that.) Posted by: therep at September 14, 2006 6:44 AMI'd say he returned the contrib from Wright Bros b/c it's a corporation and corporate checks are banned by law. Posted by: Just Guessing at September 14, 2006 8:47 AMI was not there, and I did not file the complaint. It was filed by Ted Cook, a Hardin County resident with a good nose for government mismanagement on the local and state level. Contrary to the Registry's assertions, the rules Mr. Rinks violated have been in place for several years. The rules cited in the complaint clearly state that a candidate cannot report an expense as a credit card payment - the candidate is required to disclose what he paid for with the credit card. We will most likely never know what Mr. Rinks spent that $40,000.00 on. Just another example of the perks of power in a corrupt system. I hope Mr. Boyd has better luck than Mr. Cook did, but I wouldn't bet on it. Had Ms. Pruitt charged her rent to her credit card and reported it as payment of her monthly bill, she would, by virtue of the same reasoning in the Registry's dismissal of Mr. Cook's complaint, be free and clear. Posted by: Vance Dennis at September 14, 2006 10:21 AMBill, As I understood the why the Tennessee Registry of Election Finance dismissed my 'complaint' was basically three fold. First, Rep. Rinks' 2005 Supplement, a 'between election' year, as dated February 08, 2006, (one week before the new 'ethics' law was signed by the Governor), and the way Mr. Rawlins computed the time, my complaint was four (4) days past the 180 day time frame of the old statute, and therefore Rep. Rinks' Supplement had to be considered sufficient, although the time frame, as of February 15, 2006, is now two (2) years. It was put forth that the Registry's hands were tied, unless I was prepared to allege and prove fraud, at the meeting. I tried to explain that in the broadest sense, a fraud is a deception made for personal gain and that was applicable to converting campaign contributions to personal use. I tried to explain that it was not my responsibility to allege or prove fraud, but was told that unless I was prepared to prove fraud, that day, my complaint was going to be dismissed. Duh! Second, the Registry could not assess penalties for anything that wasn't encompassed in the statutes themself and their rules had no bearing. Mr. Rawlins tried to explain to me, and his puppets, that that was the reason the Registry couldn't or didn't raise the issues themselves. This was after I pointed out to these folks that their own rules forbid these type of 'contributions' and their totally obscure purpose descriptions and had the Registry review for these reports for compliance, they should have returned the filings for correction, themself, within the 180 days. Third, and my favorite, was put forth by the Chairperson, One could accused the Registry of being not only complacent, but "in denial", about the failings of their system.
Bill, Did you see where the Registry slapped Ex-State Senator K. Bowers with a $10,000 fine for (basically) not answering a 'show-cause' letter? Posted by: Jim Boyd at September 16, 2006 9:54 AMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||