 | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Unwanted annexation | Main | What's In It For Phil? » August 7, 2006Reuters admits altering of Beirut photoBy Rick Forman Of course the news organizations hide behind plausible deniability. Yet it woud be obvious to a freshman journalism student the photo was doctored. One could deduce that this is business as usual by the press to slant the coverage and influence public opinion. Little Green Footballs has been all over this latest snapu. Posted in Journalism & Media
Comments
Snapu? Posted by: brittney at August 7, 2006 11:30 AMOh, wait, I get it. Because it is a snapshot. Carry on. Posted by: brittney at August 7, 2006 11:35 AMLGF? Gee, there's an unbiased source. Posted by: A Nonny Moose at August 7, 2006 8:08 PMYou wouldn't expect LGF to be non-biased. Reuters did not admit to altering the Beirut photo. Your headline is dead wrong. They admitted to publishing an altered photo from a freelancer. Very large difference. Posted by: brittney at August 8, 2006 7:00 AMSo, Nonny... just because it was LGF who broke it, it was incorrect? Well... may want to let Reuters that they didn't have to fire the guy and pull all of his photos. Guess LGF was right, huh? Posted by: bigby at August 8, 2006 8:17 AMBrittney, Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||
