About | Portfolio | Backup | Archives | PayPal Tip Jar | Amazon Tip Jar | Shop@Amazon
Advertising


Search BillHobbs.com
Stats, Etc.


TTLB Ecosystem Stats
Powered by FeedBurner


« Pensacola Beach and Bay | Main | White Sands »

August 10, 2006

Picking and Choosing

The Tennessean says the voters of Nashville ought to have the right to select their vice mayor .... but not their property tax rate.

The best time for voters to express their opinions about tax increases is during mayoral and council campaigns, not by vetoing a tax hike that is needed.
In the view of The Tennessean all tax hikes are "needed," but voters are too dumb to understand the specifics of why - but not too dumb to pick which candidates are smart enough to make the decision to raise taxes.

But, wait. While The Tennessean thinks the average Nashville voter couldn't understand the specifics of the city budget, they apparently do think the average voter in America IS smart enough to understand the federal budget, which is more complex by several orders of magnitude than the Nashville city budget, as they revealed in an editorial recently urging that the official "Financial Report of the United States" be widely publicized so "the public" can "demand fiscal sanity from Congress and the White House."

Rep. Jim Cooper, D-Nashville, has been arguing for honesty in government accounting; now he's taking this issue directly to the people by releasing the official "Financial Report of the United States" in book form.

The financial report is not the same as the U.S. budget: It's far more accurate. The budget, which is widely distributed, is the report that serves as the basis for decisions in Congress. Yet the other report - the audited financial report of the U.S. - is released around Christmas with no fanfare. Only a few copies are printed. It has been available on the Treasury Department Web site, but the public has never been made aware of that fact. And the financial report - not the budget - uses the standard rules of accounting that the government requires businesses to use.

The difference in the two financial documents is completeness. While the budget sticks to cash accounting, using revenues and expenses, the financial report uses accrual accounting; instead of just counting expenses when the checks are cut, it counts expenses as they are incurred.

In the foreword to the book, which is due in bookstores this month, Cooper explains that he's been trying to convince government officials to use the audited financial statement so that Americans can understand the seriousness of the U.S. debt and deficit. House members now support that request; they've passed a measure asking the president to use the audited numbers in his budget. The Senate needs to pass this bill.

The U.S. government should live by the same accounting rules it requires of businesses. Knowing that the deficit and debt are far more serious than ever imagined would be painful in the short-term, but only when all the information is known can the public demand fiscal sanity from Congress and the White House.

I'm guessing by "demand fiscal sanity from Congress and the White House," The Tennessean really means "elect Congress members and presidents who will raise taxes."

But ... where is the Tennessean editorial urging wide distribution of Nashville's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, so Nashville voters can 'demand fiscal sanity" from Metro Council and the Nashville mayor's office?

Okay then, back to my regularly scheduled vacation...

Posted in Nashville

Comments

If Jim Cooper thinks going strictly to "accural accounting" is going to lead to jacking up taxes to pay for "shortfalls" in Social Security/Medicare, he is sorely mistaken. The benefits scheduled to be paid out in 30 years are not an expense until the budget year in which they are due. Which is 30 years from now.

That's if you're thinking you'll get those benefits. Surely Jim Cooper has read Fleming V Nestor (1960), which in no uncertain terms stated that the citizenry does not own a piece of the Social Security pie. If you don't own it, is it really yours?

Posted by: Brad S at August 10, 2006 11:48 AM
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!









Remember personal info?






Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




back to top
Advertising

Lamar!

Find the Good
and Praise It
I Also Blog At...
button-fcs-blog.gif
Archives
Blogroll