![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Pensacola Beach and Bay | Main | White Sands » August 10, 2006Picking and ChoosingThe Tennessean says the voters of Nashville ought to have the right to select their vice mayor .... but not their property tax rate. The best time for voters to express their opinions about tax increases is during mayoral and council campaigns, not by vetoing a tax hike that is needed.In the view of The Tennessean all tax hikes are "needed," but voters are too dumb to understand the specifics of why - but not too dumb to pick which candidates are smart enough to make the decision to raise taxes. But, wait. While The Tennessean thinks the average Nashville voter couldn't understand the specifics of the city budget, they apparently do think the average voter in America IS smart enough to understand the federal budget, which is more complex by several orders of magnitude than the Nashville city budget, as they revealed in an editorial recently urging that the official "Financial Report of the United States" be widely publicized so "the public" can "demand fiscal sanity from Congress and the White House." Rep. Jim Cooper, D-Nashville, has been arguing for honesty in government accounting; now he's taking this issue directly to the people by releasing the official "Financial Report of the United States" in book form.I'm guessing by "demand fiscal sanity from Congress and the White House," The Tennessean really means "elect Congress members and presidents who will raise taxes." But ... where is the Tennessean editorial urging wide distribution of Nashville's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, so Nashville voters can 'demand fiscal sanity" from Metro Council and the Nashville mayor's office? Okay then, back to my regularly scheduled vacation... Posted in Nashville
Comments
If Jim Cooper thinks going strictly to "accural accounting" is going to lead to jacking up taxes to pay for "shortfalls" in Social Security/Medicare, he is sorely mistaken. The benefits scheduled to be paid out in 30 years are not an expense until the budget year in which they are due. Which is 30 years from now. That's if you're thinking you'll get those benefits. Surely Jim Cooper has read Fleming V Nestor (1960), which in no uncertain terms stated that the citizenry does not own a piece of the Social Security pie. If you don't own it, is it really yours? Posted by: Brad S at August 10, 2006 11:48 AMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||