![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Tripping | Main | Embarrassing » June 11, 2006My Head Is SpinningSunday's Washington Post has an Associated Press story about recent events in Somalia wants you to know the following: Islamic militants winning = peace. Somalia's Future Hinges on Victors' LawsYeah. Lucky Mogadishu! (And never mind that the AP just equated the U.S. with warlords, clan elders and the UN!) Of course, Iraq would have been peaceful if we had only let Abu Musab al-Zarqawi win. I can see that AP story now: Iraq's Future Hinges on Victors' LawsBut of course one man's "peace" is another man's tyranny. Afghanistan was peaceful under the Taliban. Unless you were a woman having your head blown off at the Kabul soccer stadium because you wore lipstick. And that Auschwitz was a very peaceful place. Except for the gas chambers. But by the AP's map, you get to "peace" by letting Islamic militants win. But having defeated a U.S.-backed alliance of secular warlords, they must unite a country whose political, religious and clan divisions have rendered it lawless, destitute and a hideout for al-Qaida terrorists and criminals for 15 years.Wait. al-Qaida terrorists are Islamic militants. One of the 11 members of the "Islamic Courts Union" that has taken control of Somalia's capital city, Mogadishu, may even have ties to al-Qaida. Somalia hasn't been brought peace by people who will now rid it of al-Qaida terrorists - it has been brought "peace" by the ideological kinfolk of al-Qaida terrorists. Which the AP apparently thinks is a good thing. Let's continue reading: The deaths of 18 American soldiers in 1992, made famous in "Black Hawk Down," were the result of a U.S. attempt to prop up a U.N.-backed government by taking out a powerful clan warlord.Get it yet? The 18 dead Americans are the United States' fault, not the fault of the Somali gunmen. But the AP fails to mention that the debacle documented in Mark Bowden's excellent book Black Hawk Down (and in the riveting movie of the same name) largely resulted from the Clinton administration's failure to provide U.S. troops in Somalia with the requested armored vehicles. The United Nations withdrew from Somalia in 1995, leaving the warlords to divide up the country and to extort as much money as possible from its 8 million citizens.And Somalia is one of the U.N.'s better achievements in recent years! After the Sept. 11 attacks, U.S. agents began working informally with some of the secular warlords to monitor terrorist activity and snatch al-Qaida suspects using the country as a rear base for attacks on Western targets in Kenya and Tanzania. U.S. officials said recently that Islamic leaders in Mogadishu are sheltering three al-Qaida leaders indicted in the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. The same al-Qaida cell is believed responsible for the 2002 suicide bombing of an Israeli-owned hotel in Kenya, which killed 15 people, and a simultaneous attempt to shoot down an Israeli airliner over Kenya.Hmm. They don't sound so "peaceful" to me. Somalia is now a lost battle in the War on Terror. Truthfully, it was lost more than a decade ago by the weak and feckless actions and decisions of the Clinton administration. And that has lead to this: The fundamentalists have raided bars and destroyed video halls showing risque films. The death penalty has been imposed for a variety of offenses."Peace," as brought to you by Islamic "militants" means lots of people being beheaded or shot execution-style for things like wearing makeup or owning a TV. But, hey, says the AP, Mogadishu is peaceful and that's what matters. Never mind those mass graves that will be coming soon to Somalia... Update: Watching World Cup soccer is now banned in Somalia. No word on whether it's one of the variety of offenses for which the peaceful Islamic radicals will now behead Somalis... Posted in Miscellaneous
Comments
One man's freedom is another man's tyranny. In any kind of society, even our own, each person must submit to another's rule, whether people like it or not. Posted by: thehomelessguy at June 11, 2006 2:36 PMThe irony is, AP is actually somewhat correct, for the wrong reasons. The battle for years has been between an essentially "stateless" social culture and the "wanna-be government" of the warlords the CIA has backed. So if the CIA stopped propping up their warlords, the result could actually be more peaceful, though with less of a formal "government" in place. Posted by: Steve Trinward at June 12, 2006 12:17 PMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||