About | Portfolio | Backup | Archives | PayPal Tip Jar | Amazon Tip Jar | Shop@Amazon
Advertising


Search BillHobbs.com
Stats, Etc.


TTLB Ecosystem Stats
Powered by FeedBurner


« Yesterday on Music Row | Main | A Kelo Executive Order »

June 24, 2006

Flying Blind

The Saturday Tennessean reports that there is some sort of deal in the works that could eventually repeal something called the "Wright Amendment," which, reporter Bush Bernard says, has prevented Southwest Airlines from flying directly from Nashville to Dallas' Love Field airport. This deal, says The Tennessean, "could result in lower fares to Dallas."

Well, I had no idea!

The story, on page one of the June 24 business section, is not only nine days late - the compromise deal was announced late on June 15 - it contains a rather odd error. In the section looking at how the deal may impact fares from Nashville to Dallas, reporter Bernard writes:

Colleen Conway-Welch, dean of the nursing school at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, who usually flies to Dallas on American, is glad the Wright Amendment appears to be on the way out. "I think it's a step forward," she said. "This was a very convoluted problem ... and I think they've come to a good solution for the interim."
Uh, no. Welch is not glad the Wright Amendment is "on the way out." In fact, she wrote an op-ed in support of the Wright Amendment not too long ago which called for keeping the Wright restrictions in place and for closing Love Field and forcing Southwest to move its service to Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport.

Her op-ed was published June 14 - in The Tennessean.


Update June 26: Shortly after I wrote this post, I emailed the link to it to Tennessean reporter Bush Bernard, along with this message:

Bush - Colleen Conway-Welch doesn't favor repealing the Wright amendment. She wrote an op-ed published in the Tennessean June 14 saying just the opposite. I blogged it - and the deal you reported today - back on June 15.
Today, Bernard emailed back:
You are correct. What I wrote was that she supports the compromise. The nuance was changed in the editing process, but either way, she does support the compromise.
I'm not sure Bernard has it right yet on Welch's view - he says she "supports the compromise" but doesn't suppor repeal of the Wright Amendment. But the compromise leads to the repeal of the Wright Amendment in eight years. It also ensures the continuation of operations at Love Field, while Welch's op-ed called for closing Love Field and forcing Southwest to move its operations to DFW.

But, hey, blame the editors, I guess, although I thought all those editors and layers of fact-checkers were supposed to be the advantage the mainstream media has over blogs.


Comments

Good catch! I thought Ms. Conway-Welch's logic to be convoluted in her op-ed piece. Now she appears to be pretzeling..

My big disappointment in all this is that it is going to be eight years before we can get a non-stop from Nashville to Love Field via Southwest.

Posted by: john h at June 24, 2006 8:49 AM
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!









Remember personal info?






Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




back to top
Lamar!

Find the Good
and Praise It
I Also Blog At...
button-fcs-blog.gif
Advertising

Archives
Blogroll