About | Portfolio | Backup | Archives | PayPal Tip Jar | Amazon Tip Jar | Shop@Amazon
Advertising


Search BillHobbs.com
Stats, Etc.


TTLB Ecosystem Stats
Powered by FeedBurner

« May 2006 | Main | July 2006 »

June 30, 2006

Bryson gathers top GOP fundraising team

The Nashville City Paper reports on the Republican heavy-hitters lining up to help GOP gubernatorial candidate Jim Bryson raise campaign funds.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and a who's-who of top-shelf Tennessee Republican fund-raisers lined up behind cash-strapped GOP gubernatorial candidate Jim Bryson Thursday. Frist sent an e-mail to supporters Thursday through his VOLPAC political action committee asking people to "step forward for Tennessee and support Jim Bryson for governor."
The story includes a snarky remark from the Bredesen campaign about its "Republicans for Bredesen," but that's a list of mostly unknown Republicans who aren't known for their fundraising prowess. Bryson's list includes some of the most successful fund-raisers in national GOP history.

A Quick Look at the News

Some headlines from Friday's Tennessean, Nashville City Paper, and Associated Press:

Tennessee corruption probes are not over yet - The FBI says "Operation Tennessee Waltz" and other public-corruption probes in Tennessee are not over yet.

Nashville economy tops state - The Nashville/Middle Tennessee area's economy is the strongest in Tennessee, UT economists say.

Pulitzer-winning photos capture history at exhibit - The Frist Center for the Visual Arts in Nashville is hosting a traveling exhibit, ''The Pulitzer Prize Photographs: Capture the Moment',' featuring more than 130 images culled from Pulitzer Prize-winning entries from 1942 to the present, today through August 20, at the downtown Nashville museum.

Nashville is ninth-worst speed trap, motorists say - That's among cities nationally. Nashville has some 35 "speed traps" within the city limits.

TennCare change requires proof of citizenship - A new federal law requires proof of citizenship to receive TennCare and, starting Monday, those applying for the first time for TennCare or those trying to be recertified will have to show proof of citizenship and identity. It's a new federal law designed to curb benefits for illegal immigrants. The City Paper says Tennessee State officials and "health care advocates" are "concerned about the possible side affects" of the law. TennCare, the state’s Medicaid program, is already prohibited for illegal immigrants - this new law simply adds teeth to that law.

Tour favorites barred in doping scandal - Favorites Jan Ullrich, Ivan Basso and dozens of other cyclists were barred Friday from the Tour de France in a doping scandal, causing a massive upheaval on the eve of cycling's premier race. Ullrich and Basso were the only riders who were a serious challenge to now-retired seven-time champion Lance Armstrong in recent years.

China cracks down on blogs, search engines - China's Internet regulators are stepping up controls on blogs and search engines to block material it considers unlawful or immoral, the government said Friday. A study by Tsinghua University in Beijing estimates that China has 37 million blogs, and that number is expected to nearly double this year to 60 million. The Chinese government is going to lose this fight eventually.

Posted by Bill in Miscellaneous. Permalink | Comments (1)

The Handwriting Is On the Blog

Jason Mohr writes for the Helena, Montana, Independent Record, and also writes for the paper's Town Blog. Or did. He's leaving the paper, and ending the blog. His final blog entry made me chuckle:

When you see your job advertised in your own newspaper, you know your time is running short. Or when someone in Tennessee blogs about it (he makes a good point).
Best of luck to you in Duluth, Mr. Mohr. Here's hoping they let you blog there, too.

A side note: The Society of Professional Journalists in "Region 10," which includes Alaska, Montana, Oregon and Washington, gives out awards to newspaper writers for "best general news/commentary blog." Do all SPJ regional chapters do that?

I Blame the Bush Tax Cuts

The United States government's Bureau of Economic Analysis yesterday released the final estimate of economic growth in the first quarter of 2006, pegging the growth of gross domestic product (GDP) in the 1st quarter at a 5.6 percent annual rate - which, for those of you who don't pay much attention to things economic, is absolutely smokin' fast growth. The GDP report can be seen at this link. It's a PDF file.

June 29, 2006

Hay!

hay 003.jpg
As seen off Old Hillsboro Road in Williamson County, Tennessee, this morning. Click image for larger version.

Posted by Bill in Photoblogging. Permalink | Comments (0)

Good ROI: $10,500 in Campaign Donations Nets $5 Million Budget Grant

I have seen an advance copy of the Tennessee Center for Policy Research's "Monthly Misuse" for June, which will be released later today, along with the information and public records they used to compile it, and it provides yet another example of how well-connected lobbyists for special interests are getting what they want from the Bredesen administration.

This month's TCPR report looks at a budget earmark that gave $5 million to Memphis Bioworks, a 501(c)3 nonprofit that was created to lure Biotech talent and firms to Memphis. Typically what organizations like that do is create "studies" to support their mission, and use tax dollars to provide corporate welfare to the target industry via the building of a taxpayer-subsidized business park

According to the documents I've seen, the Bredesen administration's original state budget recommendations released after Gov. Bredesen's State of the State address included a $3.5 million earmark for Memphis Bioworks, the first time Bioworks has received state funding. After the state's huge revenue surplus was revealed in May, the administration upped the Memphis Bioworks earmark to $5 million.

Here are the interesting facts:

1. Memphis Bioworks has 18 board members, two of whom are university presidents (UT and U of Memphis). As TCPR notes, university presidents rarely donate to political campaigns. Of the remaining 16 board members, 12 of them have made campaign contributions to Bredesen. Contributions to Bredesen's campaign fund by those 12 board members and their spouses total $36,500 over the past three years. A 13th board member didn't donate directly to Bredesen but did give $1,750 to a PAC that contributed $5,000 to Bredesen in 2005. Also, Memphis Bioworks President and Executive Director Steven Bares contributed $500 to Bredesen in December of 2003.

2. Six of the Memphis Bioworks board members contributed a total of $10,500 to Bredesen in a twelve-day span in December of 2005, only days before the beginning of the Special Session on Ethics and as the administration was finalizing its preliminary budget recommendations for Fiscal Year 2006-07.

3. Calvin Anderson, a member of the Memphis Bioworks Board of Directors is both an annual contributor to Bredesen and a registered lobbyist for BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee.

4. A former Bredesen donor and current member of the Memphis Bioworks Board of Director is Dr. Kenneth Robinson who now serves in Bredesen's cabinet as the state's Commissioner of Health.

5. Memphis Bioworks is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit corporation which, by law, can do only a very limited of lobbying. But Memphis Bioworks has a contract a lobbying firm that employs super-lobbyist Betty Anderson to lobby the state government. Anderson, of course, is the wife of House Speaker Jimmy Naifeh.

Did the campaign donations make the governor more amenable to giving $5 million of your tax dollars to a corporate welfare program called Memphis Bioworks? You do the math. It certainly didn't hurt.

The TCPR;s "Monthly Misuse" will be posted around lunchtime today at their website.

Update: The full text of the TCPR press release is in the extended portion of this blog entry, or online here.

Is Memphis Bioworks' Pork Project a Political Payoff?
In the final days of Tennessee's legislative session, state revenue collectors revealed an estimated $300 million state surplus. The Bredesen administration quickly seized the surplus funds, offering $244.1 million in new spending amendments to the appropriations bill.

Buried among the administration's 146 project requests was a $1.5 million increase to the Memphis Bioworks' original $3.5 million line item from the initial budget proposal. The $5 million in taxpayer funding is intended to offset a portion of the construction costs of Memphis Bioworks' new research park.

The research park is an arm of the Memphis Bioworks Foundation, a nonprofit organization attempting to expand the bioscience industry in Memphis. One way that Memphis Bioworks lures biotech-related companies to Memphis is to offer corporate welfare through building laboratory facilities and other infrastructure at no cost to the private businesses that use them.

"It should not be the role of the State government to plunder $5 million from the pockets of taxpayers for what amounts to corporate welfare for the private companies benefited by the research park," said Drew Johnson, president of the Tennessee Center for Policy Research. "I think it's wonderful that the city of Memphis wants to attract biotech firms, but they should not rely on state tax dollars to do so."

Another question that arises from this expenditure is why this special interest group, who has never received state funding before this year and only benefits one industry in one city in Tennessee, received $5 million in taxpayer funds. The answer may be found in the political contributions made by Memphis Bioworks' board members.

Twelve of Memphis Bioworks' 18 board members have made campaign contributions to the Governor's campaign coffers. In total, Memphis Bioworks' board members and their spouses have contributed $36,500 to Bredesen over the past three years. Another board member who did not donate directly to the campaign gave $1,750 to a PAC that contributed $5,000 to Bredesen in 2005.

Of these contributions, $10,500 came in a twelve-day period in December of 2005. This was only days before the start of the Special Session on Ethics and just as the administration was finalizing its preliminary budget recommendations for the new fiscal year, which included the initial $3.5 million in funding for Memphis Bioworks.

"Given the Governor's commitment to improving ethics in the state government, I hope that these well-timed contributions are only a coincidence," Johnson said. "However, many taxpayers fear that the state government bases decisions about how to spend Tennesseans' hard-earned money on campaign contributions. The $5 million funding of the Memphis Bioworks pork project certainly shows that those fears may be justified."

Memphis Bioworks is a 501(c)3 nonprofit, which, by law, can do only very limited lobbying. The organization, however, has a contract with a major Nashville firm to lobby the state government. In addition, Calvin Anderson and Dr. Kenneth Robinson both serve on the board of Memphis Bioworks. Anderson is a registered lobbyist for his employer, BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, and Robinson serves as the state Commissioner of Health. These connections potentially offer further opportunities to encourage state funding of Memphis Bioworks. In addition to state lobbying activities, Memphis Bioworks has also spent tens of thousands of dollars in each of the past two years on federal lobbying.

The "Monthly Misuse" is a monthly feature produced by the Tennessee Center for Policy Research to highlight an example of wasteful or questionable spending of tax dollars by the Tennessee state government.

Sounds like a political payoff to me.

Out of Season

Tennessee Attorney General Paul Summers says he won't apply for the open seat on the state Supreme Court, reports the Wednesday Nashville City Paper. One wonders if Summers' vociferous support a few years ago for an unconstitutional state income tax - which would require overturning three different unanimous Supreme Court rulings - cost him a shot at the job in an election year in which the truth of the incumbent governor's commitment to keeping Tennessee income tax-free is going to be seriously challenged.

June 28, 2006

An Example of Why Eminent Domain Reform Is Needed

Nashvillians Kenneth and Toni Eaton used to own a used car lot in downtown Nashville. It was their property - until the day that the Metro Development and Housing Authority decided to take the Eaton's property and let a private developer to build condos on. MDHA and the people who run the city decided that condos would be nicer there than a used car lot. So they condemned the Eaton's property and took it. And then MDHA turned the property over to a private developer, AHR Development Inc. And today part of the "Row 8.9n" urban townhouse development sits on what used to be the Eaton's property. A group of banks, architects, engineers, construction companies and landscape architects all made money off the deal, which was funded by tax dollars.

The Nashville City Paper has an update on the ongoing lawsuit. Unfortunately, by building the townhouses before the litigation was settled, MDHA has rigged the game so that even if the Eatons win, so does MDHA. If the Eatons prevail in court they can't get their property back, just a financial settlement - which MDHA would pay with your tax dollars.

Angry yet?

[Editor's note: After I posted this, I received an email from a reader that got me digging a little more. The emailer wrote: "Rumor has it, that the developer of the 8.9N project is none other than Steve Neighbors...husband to Diane Neighbors, Councilperson-at-Large and...[wait for it]...the Campaign Treasurer for Bill Purcell going all the way back to the Tennessee State House! Curious."

Well, it's not a rumor. Steve Neigbors is indeed president of something called The Home Company of Middle Tennessee, which is the home construction subsidiary of Affordable Housing Resources, which also owns AHR Development, the development subsidiary. Among the people on Affordable Housing Resources' board are Metro Nashville Vice Mayor Howard Gentry, and Hank Helton of MDHA and director of the Mayor's Office of Affordable Housing.

Neighbors's wife, Diane Neigbors, is Vice Chair of Metro Council's Budget & Finance Committee, which allocates tax dollars to, among other things, MDHA.

The Eatons, last time I checked, were not well-connected power players in Metro government. Which is why their property isn't their property anymore, and a well-connected developer and builder was able to use tax dollars to build townhomes on it.]

The Eatons are not alone - eminent domain abuse and the government seizure of private property to benefit well-connected private interests is an accelerating national tragedy.

Jeff Cornwall noted recently on his excellent blog, in the year since the Kelo decision in which the U.S. Supreme Court changed the definition of property rights, shifting ownership of property "from an inalienable right of individual citizens to a privilege that can be taken away by a state or local government that decides they have a 'better use' for our property, the number of private properties seized by government nationwide under "eminent domain" has skyrocketed.

In just the past year, more than 5,700 properties nationwide have been threatened by or taken with eminent domain for private development-a figure that compares with more than 10,000 examples over a five-year period preceding the Kelo argument, according to one of five reports released Tuesday by the Institute for Justice (which argued the Kelo case before the U.S. Supreme Court).

By the way, the Institute for Justice state-by-state summary of legislative action in the year since the Kelo decision lists Tennessee as one of the states where the legislature has improved property owners' protections against eminent domain abuse - but just barely:

Tennessee created a State commission to study the use of eminent domain and ways of reining in abuse. House Bill 3450/Senate Bill 3296 was signed by Governor Phil Bredesen, slightly improving the definition of blight and providing additional notice during the condemnation process. More reforms will be needed next year, especially in regard to the State’s still too-broad definition of “blight.”
The Institute for Justice isn't from around these parts so they can be forgiven for not knowing that, when the legislature wants to avoid doing something, it sends it to a study commission.

Posted by Bill in Kelo. Permalink | Comments (7)

June 27, 2006

A Simple Proposal

Republican gubernatorial candidate Jim Bryson on Monday promised state-level reforms to combat illegal immigration, and incumbent Gov. Phil Bredesen again showed his indifference to the problem and his predilection to pass the buck by saying illegal immigration isn't his problem, it's a federal government problem. From the Tuesday Nashville City Paper, this report:

Sen. Jim Bryson, the Republican challenger to Gov. Phil Bredesen, used the example of the Wilsons' death to draw differences on immigration policy between himself and Bredesen.

Bryson (R-Franklin) held a news conference with Heather Lynn Steffek, the eldest daughter of the Wilsons, who were killed this month in a head-on car wreck allegedly caused by Gustavo Reyes Garcia, an illegal immigrant.

"Part of the shock of the tragedy is learning there is simply no laws in place at the local or state level to aide deportation of a serial criminal who is an illegal alien," Steffek said. "I'm asking the governor to please support legislation that would remove criminal illegal immigrants from our midst."

From 1997 on, Metro Police have arrested Garcia 17 times, with at least 13 of those involving driving infractions and five DUIs. The Tennessee Highway Patrol stopped Garcia for speeding in 2001.

Both Bryson and Steffek said they were supportive of legislation that would give the Tennessee Highway Patrol, and local police forces, immigration enforcement authority to allow them to detain illegal immigrants and turn them over to the proper authorities to keep accidents like the Wilsons' tragedy from happening again.

"We must have a system that allows patrolmen to check an immigrant's illegal status during routine patrols and decide whether that immigrant should be held," Bryson said. Bryson voted for a bill giving the THP the authority to do that earlier this year.

Bredesen was against the bill during the legislative session and remained opposed Monday, saying he doesn't "think the THP ought to be doing the federal government's work."

"I don't want to turn the highway patrol into an arm of the Immigration and Naturalization Service," Bredesen said. "That's just trying to make political hay out of a difficult problem."

Bryson called Bredesen "irresponsible and indifferent" to dismiss the concerns of "Ms. Steffek and others in her situation with a wave of the hand that it is simply a federal issue."

First, as Powertee notes over at the Bryson for Governor blog, Bredesen's indifference to the illegal immigration problem is rather obvious from his response. Powertee writes:
Uh, governor, the name of INS was changed in 2002, it's called Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") now. Nahh, he's not indifferent.
We have a governor who doesn't even know the name of the federal agency he's trying to pass the buck to.

As the City Paper notes in an editorial Tuesday, "State level politicians should realize the days of sticking their collective heads in the sand over illegal immigration is over."

The governor and his campaign should be wary of acting as if state government addressing illegal immigration is ridiculous. It is an issue that cuts across party, generational and racial lines. It is also an issue that is having a real impact here in Tennessee.

Certainly, being drunk, disorderly and dangerous is not something only an illegal immigrant can do. However, Garcia was in this country based on an illegal premise. Had he been deported as he should have been after an initial offense, perhaps the Wilsons would still be alive today. Instead, Garcia slipped through the cracks of a state court system that by law is not empowered to even show a passing interest in his illegal status. Instead, he was churned through the system and put back on the street more than a dozen times.

... State level politicians should realize the days of sticking their collective heads in the sand over illegal immigration is over. It is an issue Tennesseans of all walks of life expect them to deal with. Passing the buck to the feds won't solve problems at home. Neither will election year platitudes without legislative action to back it up.

In the Tennessean story on the same topic today, Bredesen's campaign flack Will Pinkston said the governor has rolled out a number measures, including the deployment of Tennessee National Guard troops to help secure the border.

But Bredesen has NOT deployed TNG troops to the border - he has merely announced that he has "agreed" to send a paltry number of troops (100) to the border, if they are requested. But they haven't been requested. The announcement was a campaign press release designed to give Bredesen cover against charges that he is soft on illegal immigration. As a bonus, if the troops actually are requested, Bredesen will get to make a nice campaign ad down on the Mexican border with the TNG soldiers as a backdrop.

Pinkston also said Bredesen had signed legislation into law to require companies doing business with the state to ensure their workers are here legally, though immigration control advocates say it doesn't go far enough.

Could more be done? Bredesen's office says no, it's a federal problem.

But Gustavo Reyes Garcia was a state and local problem from 1997 on. Metro Police arrested Garcia 17 times, with at least 13 of those involving driving infractions and five DUIs. The Tennessee Highway Patrol stopped Garcia for speeding in 2001.

The federal government doesn't enforce DUI and speeding laws, state and local governments do.

Remember what the courageous Heather Lynn Steffek said yesterday:

"I'm asking the governor to please support legislation that would remove criminal illegal immigrants from our midst."
There is a simple way to do that and, despite Bredesen's desire to do nothing and pass the buck and the blame on to a federal agency he can't name, it is something that the state can legally do, without needing federal approval or cooperation. It's this:

Pass changes to the Tennessee criminal code that says that no illegal charged with any crime is eligible for bond, no illegal convicted of any crime is eligible for less than the maximum sentence, meaning no illegal convicted of any crime is eligible for early release, "time off for good behavior," parole or probation.

In short, change the Tennessee sentencing laws to make "illegal immigrant" status an aggravating factor that impacts bond, pre-trial detention and sentencing.

That IS within the state's purview. And the only way Gov. Bredesen could argue against it would be on the added costs for running jails and prisons. But in the current political climate the average Tennessee voter cares more about getting rid of the illegals and keeping the likes of Gustavo Garcia off the streets then they do about cost - voters tend to be willing to pay what is necessary for security.

State law also should be changed to require that illegal immigrants convicted of any crime shall be held past the end of their sentence pending deportation.

If such laws were on the books now, Gustavo Reyes Garcia likely wouldn't have been on the streets to kill the Wilsons.

Bryson needs to incorporate these simple concepts into his illegal-immigration policy proposals. Bredesen would balk, of course, because Bredesen really doesn't want to do anything about illegal immigrants except make it easier for them to get drivers licenses. But voters do.

The Platform Doesn't Matter (Yes It Does)

A quote in today's Tennessean from Tennessean President and Publisher Ellen Leifeld got me thinking about something I wrote here at BillHobbs.com a few weeks ago:

The reality of the news business in the modern era is that, via blogs and related technologies, a newspaper like The Tennessean can much more rapidly add a digital video component to its news-gathering and news-distribution than a TV news operation like, say, WKRN, could add a print component. That's because it's much less expensive for a newspaper to produce and publish web video than it would be for a TV news channel to launch a printed news publication.

When The Tennessean decides to get serious about the blogosphere and the new era of news production and distribution enabled by cheap digital technologies, it can blow the competition away in a matter of months. The competition is no doubt hoping The Tennessean never realizes this.

I think perhaps they are realizing it - realizing that a newspaper can expand to include other platforms, including online, digital video and perhaps even blogs - more easily than a broadcast outlet can add a print platform, and that the newspaper has the largest number of troops - reporters and editors - for the battle.

Here's what Leifeld had to say today:

Local newspapers, more than any other media, are in a unique position to transition to any platform because it isn't the platform that matters. It's the ability to gather and disseminate news and information," she said. "Who else in the greater Nashville area has more than 250 journalists gathering news and information?
When Leifeld says "the platform doesn't matter," she means that, because she fields the largest number of journalists in Nashville (by far), The Tennessean can deliver news across most any media platform.

Of course so can any other printed publication in town. Nashville Business Journal, for example, could supplement its printed and web versions with video reports online when the story calls for it. Groundbreaking for Nissan's new Franklin headquarters, for example, would have been a prime opportunity for The Tennessean, or NBJ, or the Williamson Herald, for that matter, to post a video report from the event minutes after the event occurred - or even stream it live.

The platform doesn't matter. But in some very crucial ways the platform does matter. A few months ago I spoke to the members of the Society of Professional Journalists chapter at Tennessee State University about the role of blogs in the news business. I spoke about how independent blogs are impacting the news media, and how blogs, including this one, have broken news stories right under the noses of the big media. But blogs and other online/digital formats such as online video and podcasts, are important platforms for the economic future of the news industry for the simple reason that young adults aren't reading newspapers.

I was speaking to a classroom filled with about two dozen student journalists, and yet when I asked how many of them read a newspaper, not one raised a hand. But when I asked how many read news online, most of them did. And these were journalism students. If today's journalism students aren't picking up printed newspapers, but are reading news online, the platform does matter.

It's good to see The Tennessean waking up.

Update: Poynter Online has a relevant column today by Poynter Institute researcher Rick Edmonds, which examines the business prospects for the newspaper industry as it transitions to the online world.

"No one in the newsroom fails to see the change (in how people consume media)," said Robert W. Decherd, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Belo Corp., which owns the Dallas Morning News. So at the Dallas Morning News, for example, editors are tackling questions like "how do still photographers, Pulitzer Prize winners, get excited about videography for the Web?"

...Decherd was one of several presenters -- including Janet Robinson of New York Times Co. -- who didn't even mention newspapers until well into their 50-minute presentations. Belo has rewritten its mission statement defining itself as a "journalistically-based media company." But that doesn't mean they have forgotten, as Decherd put it, about "vigorously supporting the marketing position of our traditional businesses" as the big push shifts to the new. In other words, he argued, the legacy businesses of print and local television need to be kept as strong as possible.

Specific discussions of journalism are always rare at these meetings, and the couple of exceptions matched the general theme of enthusiasm for the new. Lee Enterprises presented several extracts from a citizen's forum on BillingsGazette.com -- one from Michael Running Wolf titled "Tribe wants justice, equity, not war" and another on a series of neighborhood cat killings. Each drew more than 40 posts within a day or so.

With 90 papers to choose from, Gannett represented as a highlight a recent push for "local, local content" at the (Fort Myers, Fla.) News-Press, where a cadre of high-tech mobile journalist roams the neighborhoods posting text, audio and video direct to the web -- some of it later "reverse-repurposed" to the newspaper itself..

Cool.

June 26, 2006

Wright Amendment Update

U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., favors repeal of the Wright Amendment - and has sponsored legislation that would exempt Tennessee from the Wright Amendment if it is not repealed. That's the gist of a letter Rep. Blackburn, who represents Tennessee's 7th District, sent me, and which arrived today. No word yet on how the recently announced "compromise" deal that would repeal the Wright Amendment in eight years affects Blackburn's legislation. See the letter by clicking the image thumbnail to the right.

ws1_top.gifFor past coverage of the debate over the Wright Amendment, which prevents Southwest Airlines from flying non-stop to Dallas from Nashville and many other cities and causes Nashvillians to pay much-higher airfares to Big D, click here, or read these recent posts of mine:

Do the Wright Thing - June 7, 2006
Wrong on the Wright Amendment - June 15, 2006
Wright Amendment Headed for the Dustbin of History! - June 15, 2006
Flying Blind - June 24, 2006

Bryson To Address Illegal Immigration Policy, Unlike Gov. Pass-The-Buck Bredesen

Republican gubernatorial candidate Jim Bryson will make a major announcement regarding state laws pertaining to illegal immigration Monday at a 3 p.m. press conference at Legislative Plaza (Room 12). He will be joined by Heather Lynn Steffek, daughter of Sean and Donna Wilson, the victims of a vehicular homicide committed by illegal immigrant Gustavo Garcia earlier this month. Miss Steffek will speak about her ordeal.

Bryson's announcement will contrast sharply with the pass-the-buck do-nothing approach of incumbent Democrat Gov. Phil Bredesen.

Donate to the Bryson campaign here.

Posted by Bill in Campaign Season. Permalink | Comments (1)

The Freedom of the Arrogant Press

After reading New York Times editor Bill Keller's lame defense of the NYT's decision to undercut the war on terror by exposing yet another program designed to fight the terrorists, University of Tennessee law professor Glenn Reynolds gives him a brief refresher course on the true meaning of the First Amendment....

A deeper error is Keller's characterization of freedom of the press as an institutional privilege, an error that is a manifestation of the hubris that has marked the NYT of late. Keller writes: "It's an unusual and powerful thing, this freedom that our founders gave to the press. . . . The power that has been given us is not something to be taken lightly."

The founders gave freedom of the press to the people, they didn't give freedom to the press. Keller positions himself as some sort of Constitutional High Priest, when in fact the "freedom of the press" the Framers described was also called "freedom in the use of the press." It's the freedom to publish, a freedom that belongs to everyone in equal portions, not a special privilege for the media industry. (A bit more on this topic can be found here.)

When elite-media big shots like Bill Keller talk about the First Amendment as a special freedom that belongs to the media, rather than a general freedom that belongs to all Americans, they simultaneously show their arrogance and their ignorance.

More here from Austin Bay. And Heather MacDonald says the NYT is a national security threat. Her article is a must-read.

Now that the Times has blown the cover on this terror-tracking initiative, sophisticated terrorists will figure out how to evade it, according to the Treasury's top counterterrorism official, Stuart Levey, speaking to the Wall Street Journal. The lifeblood of international terrorism--cash--will once again flow undetected.
And it's all thanks to Bill Keller.

Update: Glenn Reynolds has links to more criticism of the NYT for compromising national security and increasing the danger for our troops as well as for, well, everyone in America.

Update: Katherine Coble is smarter than Bill Keller.

Looking Tough

A story in Friday's Nashville City Paper says state Sen. Jim Bryson, the likely Republican nominee to face incumbent Gov. Phil Bredesen in the November election, will run a "bold, unconventional and unpredictable campaign." And a big angle of attack on Bredesen - in addition to the easy shots at Bredesen over his failure to fix TennCare (and the subsequent dumping of 193,000 sick, old, poor and disabled people off the TennCare rolls), and the string of ethics scandals that have cast a tinge of backroom smoke and dirty dealing over the administration (remember those state troopers getting promotions in exchange for campaign donations) - will be Bredesen's failure to protect the people of Tennessee from the negative impact of illegal immigration.

Bredesen has said that immigration is a federal problem and opposes giving state troopers authority to enforce immigration law. He recently did agree to allocate 100 National Guard troops to the border.
Announcing a willingness to send a handful of Tennessee National Guard troops to the Mexican border was a naked political move by Bredesen - a piece of opportunistic symbolism. The troops have not been requested, but "agreeing" to send them gave Bredesen the opportunity to appear tough on illegal immigration.

He is anything but.

While Bredesen's administration hands out "driver certificates" to illegals, it did nothing to stop the Mexican consulate from using a public high school in Nashville - government property - as a site to distribute those dubious "matricular consular" cards to illegals living here, a form of ID for illegals that presents a very real security risk.

Bryson supports legislation that would involve the THP in enforcing immigration laws, and also supports giving driver's license tests in English only. Bredesen opposes both - and when pressed on illegal immigration he merely passes the buck and says it's a federal matter.

But the federal government is doing nothing or the wrong thing most of the time on that issue, and Tennessee taxpayers are spending millions for healthcare, education and a myriad of other services for people who have no right, legal or otherwise, to be here.

And the gravest danger of Bredesen's inaction and buck-passing on illegal immigration was brought home to the Nashville area a few days ago with the killing of a Mt. Juliet couple by an illegal immigrant drunk driver who, if anyone in local or state government had done their jobs right, would not have been here.

No, Bredesen won't do what is necessary to address illegal immigration. He IS willing to send a paltry number of TNG troops to the Mexican border, if they're requested, which they haven't been. Of course he's willing to send them - they'd a good backdrop in a Bredesen campaign ad showing him as "tough" on illegal immigration.

But looking tough and being tough are two different things. And Bredesen is as far from tough on illegal immigration as Nuevo Laredo is from the North Pole.

Illegal immigration is the hottest political issue nationwide - and polls consistently show people want tougher measures taken. It's an issue that could expose Bredesen, a supposed 800-pound political gorilla, as a paper tiger instead.

Donate to the Bryson campaign here.

Posted by Bill in Campaign Season. Permalink | Comments (1)

Emphasizing the "Junior"

Harold Ford Jr. reportedly called the three Republicans running for the U.S. Senate from Tennessee "the three stooges." Didn't Junior's daddy ever teach him not to call people names?

Posted by Bill in Campaign Season. Permalink | Comments (0)

June 24, 2006

My Friend Flickr


This and more photos on my Flickr page, including more horse photos, if you like that sort of thing.

Posted by Bill in Photoblogging. Permalink | Comments (0)

A Kelo Executive Order

President Bush has issued an executive order that might be a positive step toward eminent domain reform. Or it might not be:

The political backlash against the Supreme Court's decision Kelo v. City of New London has largely fallen short of the mark, despite massive public outrage against the condemnation of property to promote "economic development" by other private parties. ... Numerous state legislatures are enacting laws that supposedly ban Kelo-style [takings] but actually achieve little or nothing. Today's presidential executive order on eminent domain continues this pattern. On the surface, the order seems to forbid federal agencies from undertaking economic development condemnations. But its wording undercuts this goal. ... Even had President Bush's order been better worded, its impact would have been limited. The vast majority of economic development condemnations are undertaken by state and local governments, not by federal agencies. Nonetheless, it is unfortunate that the Bush administration has chosen to join in the charade of pretending to do something about Kelo while actually doing little or nothing.
Tennessee is one of those states where the legislature passed legislation that appears to - but really doesn't - reign in eminent domain abuse.

And despite what you hear from some quarters, government in Tennessee does abuse its eminent domain authority to take private property from its owners and give it to wealthy private developers. As the Tennessee Center for Policy Research notes in a recent Kelo-related press release:

Currently in Memphis, James Sneed is fighting to keep his 80-year-old home that the Memphis Housing Authority is attempting to condemn as a part of "Uptown Memphis," a mixed-income community to be owned by a private developer. The project, which will cost taxpayers $200 million, will force hundreds of middle class and low-income residents from their homes.

Sixty-six of the 176 properties acquired by the Memphis Housing Authority for Uptown Memphis have been condemned through eminent domain against the will of the owners.

Read the rest of TCPR's release here.

For all my past posts mentioning Kelo, click here.

Posted by Bill in Kelo. Permalink | Comments (0)

Flying Blind

The Saturday Tennessean reports that there is some sort of deal in the works that could eventually repeal something called the "Wright Amendment," which, reporter Bush Bernard says, has prevented Southwest Airlines from flying directly from Nashville to Dallas' Love Field airport. This deal, says The Tennessean, "could result in lower fares to Dallas."

Well, I had no idea!

The story, on page one of the June 24 business section, is not only nine days late - the compromise deal was announced late on June 15 - it contains a rather odd error. In the section looking at how the deal may impact fares from Nashville to Dallas, reporter Bernard writes:

Colleen Conway-Welch, dean of the nursing school at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, who usually flies to Dallas on American, is glad the Wright Amendment appears to be on the way out. "I think it's a step forward," she said. "This was a very convoluted problem ... and I think they've come to a good solution for the interim."
Uh, no. Welch is not glad the Wright Amendment is "on the way out." In fact, she wrote an op-ed in support of the Wright Amendment not too long ago which called for keeping the Wright restrictions in place and for closing Love Field and forcing Southwest to move its service to Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport.

Her op-ed was published June 14 - in The Tennessean.


Update June 26: Shortly after I wrote this post, I emailed the link to it to Tennessean reporter Bush Bernard, along with this message:

Bush - Colleen Conway-Welch doesn't favor repealing the Wright amendment. She wrote an op-ed published in the Tennessean June 14 saying just the opposite. I blogged it - and the deal you reported today - back on June 15.
Today, Bernard emailed back:
You are correct. What I wrote was that she supports the compromise. The nuance was changed in the editing process, but either way, she does support the compromise.
I'm not sure Bernard has it right yet on Welch's view - he says she "supports the compromise" but doesn't suppor repeal of the Wright Amendment. But the compromise leads to the repeal of the Wright Amendment in eight years. It also ensures the continuation of operations at Love Field, while Welch's op-ed called for closing Love Field and forcing Southwest to move its operations to DFW.

But, hey, blame the editors, I guess, although I thought all those editors and layers of fact-checkers were supposed to be the advantage the mainstream media has over blogs.

June 23, 2006

Yesterday on Music Row

024musicrow.jpg
Some guy sitting on top of his van, playing his guitar, on Music Row, where the record labels have their HQs. Only in Nashville.

I Like My Boss

029roofers.jpg

Working for myself is not a bad gig.

Today, in between doing some work for some clients - including my newest client as of yesterday - I cut the grass, trimmed the trees, edged around the patio, and generally did all the stuff on a Friday morning that most guys have to do on a Saturday. We had a landscaper here today - he doesn't have a website or I'd link to it. He cut down three evergreens to make room for the PlayNation play set that's to be installed later today.

I also found time to take a few photos of the roofers replacing the shingles on my back-fence neighbor's house, because of hail damage from the April 7 storms. They are finishing up the roof while thunderstorms are moving around the area. I'm not sure I'd be on a roof with a nail gun with lightning not too far away Our insurance company has had a roofer look at ours - no word yet if they think it needs a new roof, but many of our neighbors do.

It feels like a Saturday and I have a lot of my Saturday stuff already done. But it's only 2 p.m. on a Friday.

Not bad.

Not bad at all.

032roofers.jpg

Posted by Bill in Miscellaneous. Permalink | Comments (1)

State Senate Candidate Vows Immigration Reform if Elected

State Senate candidate Chip Throckmorton is promising to pursue some rather sensible government reforms to battle illegal immigration if he is elected to replace GOP gubernatorial candidate Jim Bryson in the state Senate in November. From a Chip Throckmorton press release:

Franklin, TN - Chip Throckmorton's plan to tackle the illegal immigration crisis would begin with a reform of government itself. In his most recent television ad, Throckmorton identifies a disconnect between government policy and practice. [View Commercial]

"It seems like whenever politicians talk about immigration these days, all you hear is talk about how they want to turn small businesses into a police force. If the government is ready to get serious about illegal immigration, they ought to clean up their own house first."

In the ad, Throckmorton proposes legislation that would require all state, county and municipal contractors to employ only documented, legal workers. "As a conservative, I believe WHAT YOU DO IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN what you say. Every politician has a good sound bite on immigration reform, but I'm prepared to do something about it, requiring that the government lives by the same rules that you and I do."

Throckmorton points out that immigration is no longer simply a federal issue about securing the borders. "Our state judicial system is overwhelmed with civil and criminal cases dealing with illegal aliens and our health care providers are in crisis because of the overwhelming demand by illegals, especially for emergency care. We can't simply call for action by the federal government, we need someone in the legislature prepared to lead on this issue. If I'm elected to the State Senate, practical immigration reform will be my top priority."

Chip is one of three candidates I'm considering voting for in the August primary. The other two are financial adviser Jack Johnson, who has his own immigration-themed ad on his campaign website, and Williamson County Commission member Jeff Ford, who's website identifies illegal immigration as a top issue. Ford also has a blog.

State Senate District 23 includes all of Williamson County and parts of southern Davidson County. Election day is August 3, and early voting begins July 14.

Update: Andy Ogles, a genuinely nice guy who would make a good state legislator, has dropped out of the District 23 senate race. Oh, and Tom Neill, the former HCA exec running for the GOP nomination - his website calls the company "Hospital Corporations of America."

Posted by Bill in Campaign Season. Permalink | Comments (1)

NYT Helping Terrorists Again

The New York Times has compromised national security - which means, they've compromised your security and put your life at increased risk of terrorist attack - again.

Posted by Bill in War on Terror. Permalink | Comments (1)

Failing You

The Friday Nashville City Paper has details on how the criminal justice system repeatedly put illegal immigrant Gustavo Reyes Garcia back on the streets instead of in jail or on a bus back to Mexico. Now, two Americans are dead because the system - from local law enforcement to state law enforcement to the criminal justice system and even to the highest reaches of the federal government - failed in its primary duty: to safeguard American lives. The City Paper has a good editorial on the Garcia case as well.

Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen insists immigration is a federal issue, and fought against a proposal to involve the Tennessee Highway Patrol involved in enforcing immigration laws. But here's the bottom line: If someone at any level of government had enforced the immigration laws and removed Gustavo Reyes Garcia from American society, Sean and Donna Wilson of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee would be alive today.

Local law enforcement and the criminal justice system failed the Wilsons. Gov. Bredesen, who has done nothing on illegal immigration except to pass the buck, failed the Wilsons. The federal government failed the Wilsons. And by doing so, they all failed you, too.

And in a final insult to you, they're all going to bend over backward to protect the rights of a killer who has no right to be here in the first place.

Posted by Bill in Immigration. Permalink | Comments (0)

June 22, 2006

None So Blind As Those Who Will Not See

One of the downsides of being a thoughtful, intelligent blogger instead of a raving, ranting lunatic is you are subjected to a lot of email from raving, ranting lunatics from the other side of the political aisle. Case in point, an email I received today from "Clarence Swinney," a self-styled "political historian" from Burlington, N.C.

Norah O'Donnell told Dean--do not you think you should give Bush some slack for we have not had a terror attack in 5 years.

A response--Norah, you beauty, you either forgot or do not know this.

We have had only three attacks on America by foreign terrorists in 50 years.

You want to credit Bush with 5 years.

We had not had an attack in prior 8 years. Do you want to credit Clinton?
Swinney seems to forget that we had at least four attacks on America during the eight years of the Clinton administration - the 1993 World Trade Center bombing by al Qaeda (with an Iraqi bombmaker with ties to Saddam's government, btw), the bombings of the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania by al Qaeda in 1998, and the attack on the U.S.S. Cole by al Qaeda in October 2000.

By my count, that's four attacks on America and Americans during the Clinton administration - three if you count the simultaneous embassy bombings as one attack instead of two. And while the Cole was attacked in a Yemen port, the WTC is most definitely "America," and international law recognizes a country's embassies as its own territory. Attacks on our embassies are attacks on America.

I will give Swinney credit for one thing. I agree with his email's subject line: "I give up expecting intelligence from Democrats."

Posted by Bill in War on Terror. Permalink | Comments (3)

One Year After Kelo, Tennessee Private Property Owners Still At Risk

The Tennessee Center for Policy Research has released an assessment of how well Tennessee private property owners are protected from governmental abuse of eminent domain powers a year after the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark Kelo decision which empowered governments to take private property and give it to private developers for virtually any project for any reason.

Despite passage of new legislation, "Tennesseans aren't any more secure from having their property taken than before the law was passed," says Drew Johnson, president of the Tennessee Center for Policy Research.

One Year After Kelo Ruling, Private Property Remains Vulnerable in Tennessee
New Tennessee law to limit eminent domain abuse offers little protection for property owners
Nashville, TN - Friday marks the one-year anniversary of the infamous Kelo decision in which the Supreme Court determined that governments have the authority to use eminent domain to take homes, businesses and places of worship for private profit.

Tennessee lawmakers responded to the public outrage against the Kelo decision by passing eminent domain legislation. According to the Tennessee Center for Policy Research, however, the new law does not protect property owners enough.

"Tennessee's new eminent domain law is a joke - and the joke is on property owners across the state," said Tennessee Center for Policy Research president Drew Johnson. "Tennesseans aren't any more secure from having their property taken than before the law was passed."

In particular, Johnson says that the law's failure to clearly define blight and its outright encouragement of eminent domain use to acquire land for industrial parks makes it particularly threatening to property owners. The bill, which was signed into law by Governor Bredesen earlier this month, also specifically allows for government taking of private property for playgrounds, recreation centers and land that may one day be turned into a lake.

In the year since the Kelo decision, more than 4,000 properties have been threatened or condemned by governments that hope to transfer properties from their owners to politically connected developers.

"A year after Kelo, Tennesseans must remain vigilant in the defense of their private property rights by encouraging state lawmakers to pass genuine eminent domain reform as soon as possible," Johnson said.

I checked with Johnson, and that figure of 4,000 properties that have been "threatened or condemned by governments that hope to transfer properties from their owners to politically connected developers" is a national figure.

The Tennessee Center for Policy Research is an independent, nonprofit and nonpartisan research organization committed to public policy remedies grounded in the innovation of private enterprise, the ingenuity of individuals and the abilities of active communities to achieve a freer, more prosperous Tennessee. For more information, visit www.tennesseepolicy.org.

Posted by Bill in KeloKelo. Permalink | Comments (0)

June 21, 2006

Space for Sale

That scrolling WKRN ad up there has been running on this blog for more than a year now, and expires at the end of June. The space - 400 pixels wide, 100 pixels tall - is available for rent. Long-term deals only. Contact me at bill-at-billhobbs.com.

Posted by Bill in Site News. Permalink | Comments (0)

Blogalism Update

The Kentucky state government is censoring which blogs state employees can read on their office computers. ... Meanwhile, the blogs continue to hammer Jason "The Liar" Leopold and TruthNot.org contortionist editor Marc Ash over their continued insistence that Karl Rove was indicted (he wasn't) and allegations that Leopold lied to get his (false) scoop. MediaBlog has the latest. ... And Markos Moulitsas, a/k/a "Kos," is working overtime to squelch coverage of the growing payola scandal involving DailyKos.com and Kos' co-author and co-blogging-leftwing-activist Jerome Armstrong.

Meanwhile, here's a job posting that shows the increasing inroads that blogs are making in the newspaper business.: The primary responsibility of the position is to cover city and county government and contribute to the IR's growing on-line presence, which will include reporting, columns and blog moderation...

Improving News

"The news from the Muslim world is not that anti-Americanism has grown - that's old hat. The real news is that America's image in Muslim lands is starting to get better." So says a pollster and a Council on Foreign Relations researcher, in a Boston Globe op-ed. Related: Hollywood is detracting from the war on terror.

Posted by Bill in War on Terror. Permalink | Comments (0)

Rather Late

Dan Rather is leaving CBS. He says he's going to continue working so perhaps now he can go to work finding out the source of those forged and false documents he used to slander President Bush with just before the 2004 election. For my money, Rather's legacy can be summed up in his on-air statement a day after bloggers had already shown the documents were modern-day forgeries:

"If the documents are not what we were led to believe, I'd like to break that story."
They weren't, Dan, but you didn't break that story. It broke you.

June 20, 2006

On The Trail Of the Nun Bun

The Tennessean has the latest on the search for the famous pastry.

Posted by Bill in Nashville. Permalink | Comments (0)

Political Payola

Did "Kos" and his partner Jerome Armstrong shill for candidates who were secretly paying Armstrong thousands of dollars? It sure looks that way. And while it's not illegal, it's incredibly dishonest.

And stupid - because whatever they gained monetarily pales to the credibility that they sold. From now on, readers of Kos and Armstrong will have to wonder if the candidate or cause they're touting is being touted because Kos and Armstrong really believe in it, or because they're getting paid.

FYI, BillHobbs.com is not funded wholly or in part by any candidate, party or political organization. It's funded by, well, mainly me, along with a few dollars donated none too often by readers via the PayPal or Amazon tip jars. And revenue from blog ads, though I'm running zero ads right now. What's up with that? It's an election year and no Tennessee candidates appear to be running blog ads? What? There are no underfunded candidates out there running for governor or the state senate who wouldn't welcome a great ROI on their advertising bucks by buying a few low-cost blog ads?

All kidding aside, the ethical, open, honest way for a candidate to reward a friendly blogger is to run an ad on their blog, if they take advertising - though it won't guarantee favorable coverage on the blog. It's also a good way to reach the blog audience, of course, and at a very low cost. Regular readers of this site know I am supporting state Sen. Jim Bryson's bid for governor. He's welcome to advertise here. But so is Mark Albertini, who is running against Bryson for the GOP nomination. And so is Gov. Phil Bredesen, the incumbent Democrat. It won't get Bredesen favorable coverage, but it would get his message in front of an audience that he won't reach at Democratic Party events around the state.

I wouldn't take a dime from any of those candidates - or any candidate in any race - in secret or openly, for "consulting" work that amounts to nothing more than shilling for them on my blog. But that looks to be what Kos and Armstrong may have done, with Armstrong raking in thousands of dollars as his partner Kos urged the DailyKos.com fanatics to give money to those very same candidates.

Update: More on the Kos-ola story at Kausfiles.

Posted by Bill in BloggingBlogging. Permalink | Comments (2)

Karl Rove and the Time Traveling Aliens

Tom Maguire looks at TruthNot's ongoing insistence - in the face of all evidence to the contrary - that presidential advisor Karl Rove was indicted.

Posted by Bill in War on Terror. Permalink | Comments (0)

I Want One

My next laptop. Or not, as my Dell 700m is barely a year old.

Posted by Bill in Technology. Permalink | Comments (3)

Cobb Salad Days

Don't look now, but Sharon Cobb has dipped her toe back into the blogosphere.

Posted by Bill in Blogging. Permalink | Comments (0)

June 19, 2006

The Saudi Blogging Revolution

The Christian Science Monitor has a story on the rising number of Saudi women bloggers...

In this country where women are forced to completely cover themselves in public, are barred from driving, and need permission to travel abroad, it's small wonder many are embracing the freedom of anonymity on the Internet. As Internet usage continues to climb here, so do the numbers of women who have started Web logs, or blogs, to express themselves in ways they might never do in public.

"I love blogging because it helps me to express myself and I like to write in English," says Farah Aziz, a translation student at King Saud University in Riyadh who started blogging in January 2005.

The content of Ms. Aziz's blog (http://farahssowaleef.blogspot.com), which chronicles the life of a college student, would probably do little to cause alarm among government censors. But other women bloggers are drawing the attention of the state as well conservative male bloggers who have taken to policing the Internet for bloggers acting in ways that they perceive as inappropriate according to Islam.

Saudi Eve, who regularly writes about her love life and religion, and who declined to be identified by her real name because of the sensitivity of the issue, woke up on June 2 to find that her blog (http://eveksa.blogspot.com) had been blocked. "Back and blocked," she wrote on her blog on June 2. "I'm temporarily back in Saudi only to find that 'Saudi Eve is officially blocked in Saudi.' "

The closure of her site signals the beginning of a cyber battle between liberal Saudi bloggers and their more conservative counterparts.

I'm rooting for the libs.

Posted by Bill in Blogging. Permalink | Comments (2)

Brilliant

WKRN Channel 2 General Manager Mike Sechrist has posted video on his blog of a TV commercial the station chose not to air, an in-house promo for its weather news team. Click the link at the end of his blog post. And while you're waiting for the video to load, reflect on how brilliant a move it is for, A) WKRN to have its GM and some of its on-air personalities to have blogs, and, B) what a great move it is to use the Net as a way to distribute content the station produced but, for whatever reason, didn't broadcast.

The un-broadcast ad is funny - they ought to air it.

Bryson Hits Bredesen on TennCare, THP, Ethics

The Monday Tennessean carries an AP report on the governor's race in which Republican state Sen. Jim Bryson hits Democratic incumbent Gov. Phil Bredesen on a variety of issues, including ethics lapses involving top administration officials, the governor's failure to fix TennCare (resulting in 170,000 sick, old, disabled and poor people losing their healthcare coverage), and more.

"What we have done is limited benefits and cut people off the rolls - it doesn't take a great manager to do that," he said. Bryson said management changes at TennCare could have saved enough money to keep more people on the rolls.

Bryson said he was just drawing attention to what he called the ethical lapses and management failures of an administration that professes both areas to be strengths. He cited recent troubles at the Tennessee Highway Patrol and the shredding of sexual harassment investigation documents in the governor's office as problems. "I got into this race because I felt that there were a lot of issues related to leadership in Tennessee and whether Mr. Bredesen was providing the kind of leadership that was going to move Tennessee forward," Bryson said.

Immigration and education are among the top issues Bryson wants to campaign on. Bryson said he would establish a state office of immigration reporting directly to the governor's office. Having the Highway Patrol enforce immigration laws and imposing greater penalties for employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants are among the state-level initiatives that Bryson said he would implement.

Bredesen is very weak on the illegal immigration issue. Basically, he's for doing nothing about the flood of illegals overrunning Tennessee's economy and state budget - making him vulnerable on the hottest political issue of the day. He' also very weak on the ethics-in-government issue.

Update: Bryson today is urging Gov. Bredesen to drop his opposition to a policy that would allow state law enforcement to hand over to federal authorities illegal immigrants charged with criminal acts. Here's the press release. Excerpt:

The move comes after a Mt. Juliet couple was killed in an auto accident by an illegal immigrant who has been arrested 14 times previously.

"This is a tragedy for the family and it could have been prevented," said Sen. Bryson. "It is common sense that state law should require illegal immigrants who commit crimes be immediately turned over to federal authorities. In addition, it is incumbent upon federal officials to respond when they are contacted by state law enforcement."

Just two months ago the state Senate passed legislation that would have allowed state law enforcement to turn over to federal authorities illegal immigrants who commit crimes. Bredesen vigorously opposed Senate Bill 2426 and spoke out several times against it.

"I hope the Governor will now rethink his position on this issue," said Sen. Bryson. "I supported the legislation – which received not a single no vote in the state senate - so we could prevent tragedies like this. It is a Governor's job to lead, not oppose common sense solutions supported by the elected representatives of the people."

The press release includes a number of statements made by Bredesen showing his unwillingness to protect the legal residents of Tennessee from the adverse impacts of illegal immigration.

Here's one:

"I don't think it's appropriate for the state or we ought to be spending a lot of our money having the Highway Patrol expanded to go out and look for illegal immigrants or something," Bredesen said last week, adding that he thinks immigration is a national issue.
Because, of course, if you task THP officers with helping to enforce immigration laws, they might be too busy to write your campaign big donation checks in exchange for promotions.

In an unrelated story, Bryson has vowed to not accept campaign contributions from Tennessee Highway Patrol employees.

His promise comes after a year of headlines and media reports about troopers with criminal backgrounds, allegations of ticket-fixing, and a culture of cronyism and political arm-twisting that included preferential treatment for officers who gave money to Gov. Bredesen's 2002 gubernatorial campaign or had family members or political patrons who did.

No one on Bredesen's staff was ever fired for giving preferential treatment and promotions to troopers in exchange for campaign donations.

June 18, 2006

Waiting For Break Time to End

poolfoot.jpg

See more of my photos at my Flickr page.

Posted by Bill in Photoblogging. Permalink | Comments (0)

One Tree Hill

onetreehill01.jpg
Photographed along Hillsboro Road in Williamson County, Tennessee. See more of my photography at my Flickr page.

Atlanta Burning

A recent USA Today article looks at Nashville versus Atlanta.

Posted by Bill in Nashville. Permalink | Comments (0)

The Story of the Story About the Indictment of Karl Rove

The Sunday Washington Post has a fascinating look at the "scoop" that the leftwing TruthOut.org published saying Karl Rove had been indicted, which was, well, 180 degrees out of sync with the actual truth...

The May 13 story on the Web site Truthout.org was explosive: Presidential adviser Karl Rove had been indicted by Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald in connection with his role in leaking CIA officer Valerie Plame's name to the media, it blared. The report set off hysteria on the Internet, and the mainstream media scrambled to nail it down. Only . . . it wasn't true.

As we learned last week, Rove isn't being indicted, and the supposed Truthout scoop by reporter Jason Leopold was wildly off the mark. It was but the latest installment in the tale of a troubled young reporter with a history of drug addiction whose aggressive disregard for the rules ended up embroiling me in a bizarre escapade -- and raised serious questions about journalistic ethics.

...Leopold seems to assume, as does much of the public, that all journalists practice deception to land a story. But that's not true. I know dozens of reporters, but Leopold is only the second one I've known (the first did it privately) to admit to doing something illegal or unethical on the job.

...Leopold is in too many ways a man of his times. These days it is about the reporter, not the story; the actor, not the play; the athlete, not the game. Leopold is a product of a narcissistic culture that has not stopped at journalism's door, a culture facilitated and expanded by the Internet.

Leopold is a serial liar journalist. But he's a leftwing serial lying journalist, so he gets jobs and assignments from such outfits as Salon and the Los Angeles Times. Birds of a feather.

Read the whole thing.

June 16, 2006

Mall Fair

mallfair01.jpg

mallfair02.jpg

It's baaaack. Every year, this dinky little carnival sets up its rickety-looking rides at the local mall. Every year my children want to go. Every year we spend two weeks trying to avoid driving within visual range of the carnival. It's annual rite of summer for us and, I suspect, for a lot of parents.

They Deserve It?

The Friday Tennessean says the Dixie Chicks "deserve" airplay for their latest music. Not true. We live in a market-based economy, and that includes entertainment. Country radio station programmers aren't playing the Chicks because their audience doesn't want them to play the Chicks. How do I know? Because country radio station programmers know that their radio station exists to make money for its owners, as all for-profit businesses do. And radio stations make money by attracting lots of listeners, and then charging profitable rates for advertising. If the market - country music fans - wanted to hear the latest Dixie Chicks music on the radio, the station's programmers would be playing it. They don't, so they aren't.

You don't get what you "deserve" in a market-based economy, you get what you earn.

The Dixie Chicks said they didn't want to do country music any more and, judging from their latest album, they aren't. They don't "deserve" airplay for non-country music on country music stations, or any other stations. They'll get airplay if sufficient numbers of listeners to a radio station request it.

Posted by Bill in Miscellaneous. Permalink | Comments (9)

June 15, 2006

Wright Amendment Headed for the Dustbin of History!

ws1_top.gifSouthwest and American Airlines have agreed on a compromise regarding the future of Love Field. It includes a phasing out of the Wright Amendment, and continued service at Love Field.

The agreement also will allow Southwest to sell single tickets for connecting flights out of Dallas, instead of continuing to force customers to buy two tickets - one for each flight. This is great news as it will begin to put downward pressure on fares for Nashvillians headed to Dallas.

More here.

I wrote about the Wright Amendment earlier today, and also a few days ago here.

Wrong on the Wright Amendment

ws1_top.gifColleen Conway-Welch, dean of the School of Nursing at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, had an op-ed in the Wednesday Tennessean, headlined "Southwest's Dallas setup inconvenient for Nashville travelers", arguing against repeal of the Wright Amendment, which restricts the cities Southwest Airline can service non-stop from Dallas's Love Field. The Wright Amendment, as I wrote a few days ago, results in Nashvillians having to pay high fares to travel to Dallas on American Airlines and other carriers that use Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport.

Welch's argument falls apart for a number of reasons. Here's an excerpt of her op-ed:

I fly through Dallas frequently and have heard many opinions on whether the Dallas area should continue to maintain two airports (Love Field and Dallas Fort Worth Airport, or DFW) that are nine miles apart. Since the resolution of the issue will likely have an impact on my travel plans (and those of other Nashvillians), for better or for worse, I decided to learn more.

... If the Wright amendment is repealed, Southwest could fly from Love Field directly to all of its other cities around the country.

To remain competitive, other airlines would be forced to split their flights between Love Field and DFW, forcing all of them to serve two airports nine miles apart. They would need to reduce and/or eliminate many connecting flights offered out of the DFW hub and move them to Love Field to protect their market share in other markets served by Southwest.

This would greatly inconvenience the Nashville-originating passengers who today connect through DFW to many other domestic and international connections. It does not make sense to repeal the Wright amendment and force other airlines to use the more limited services at Love Field when there is ample room for Southwest at DFW — but Southwest would have to compete directly against those other airlines at DFW.

Choice and competition undergird the American system. If the Wright amendment is repealed, Southwest would continue to dominate Love Field and the other airlines would need to cobble together an expensive, duplicative system to use both air fields. This certainly is not cost-effective. It seems obvious that the Wright amendment should remain in effect.

If Southwest wants to fly to more cities and states from the Dallas area, they should fly from DFW, keep the "playing field" level and allow Nashvillians more and better connections on a variety of carriers out of the DFW airport, including Southwest.

From her opening sentence - "I fly through Dallas frequently..." - it is obvious Welch doesn't understand the difference between Southwest, which operates a point-to-point route structure, and American Airlines, which operates a hub-and-spoke route structure. Most of American's Dallas-bound passengers merely change planes there. Most of Southwest's Dallas-bound passengers are actually headed to Dallas. They serve different markets, with different products and services.

Beyond that, Welch seems to argue that the a "level playing field" is required for there to be fair competition between Southwest and the airlines that use DFW. But let's apply her reasoning to the local retail scene. Some retailers locate in malls, which are more expensive per square foot than your average strip mall. That means that competing stores selling identical merchandse are not on a level playing field. Yet Welch isn't calling for regulatory changes to force all retailers into the mall, to level the playing field.

Welch's op-ed also implies that it would be better for a vast, sprawling, major metropolitan area like Dallas-Fort Worth to have just one airport . But she isn't calling for the New York area to shutter three of its four airports - JFK, LaGuardia, Newark and Long Island/Islip. Houston has two airports - Bush Intercontinental and Houston-Hobby. Which would Welch suggest be shut down? The Los Angeles area has four airports - LAX, Orange County, Ontario and Burbank. The San Francisco Bay area has three - San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose. Again, which should be shut down in the name of forcing all air carriers to compete at one location?

Southwest's Love Field location is "inconvenient" for Nashville travelers only because of the Wright Amendment, which prohibits Southwest from flying non-stop from Nashville to Love Field. Repeal the Wright Amendment and you'll see non-stop service from Nashville to Love Field on Southwest, at lower fares. You'll also see American Airlines, which dominates DFW, respond by reducing fares.

And you might see American add flights from Dallas to Love Field. Welch's argument that such service would be "expensive" and "duplicative" simply don't hold water as airlines often fly to multiple airports in other cities. Southwest, for example, serves three of the four Los Angeles-area airports.

The Wright Amendment is anti-competitive and costs the American flying public some $4 billion annually in higher fares. Repealing it is the route to true competition - and lower fares.

For more on the Wright Amendment, and why it is time to repeal it, click here.

A final thought: I am mystified as to why The Tennessean would run an op-ed on the Wright Amendment by a nursing school dean rather than someone with actual expertise on the topic. Welch's main expertise seems to be that she "flies through Dallas frequently." Well, millions of people do that, and it doesn't make them an expert on the Wright Amendment.

Perhaps there's another explanation for her seemingly random interest in the Wright Amendment. American Airlines is the airline whose bottom line is most directly threatened by the repeal of the Wright Amendment. Welch and her husband, wealthy Nashville businessman and well-known Republican fund-raiser Ted Welch, are friends with Nashville businessman Joe M. Rodgers, a prominent Republican donor and activist who also is a member of American Airlines' board of directors.

UPDATE: Southwest and American Airlines have agreed on a compromise regarding the future of Love Field. It includes a phasing out of the Wright Amendment, and continued service at Love Field. Under the terms of the agreement - if it is enacted via legislation by Congress - American would get two gates at Love Field. Clearly, American Airlines doesn't intend to move a hefty amount of "expensive, duplicative" service to Love Field.

The agreement also will allow Southwest to sell single tickets for connecting flights out of Dallas, instead of continuing to force customers to buy two tickets - one for each flight.

This is great news as it will begin to put downward pressure on fares for Nashvillians headed to Dallas.

More here.

Governor Likes "Incumbent Protection" Bill

Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen is "sympathetic" to the incumbent-protection bill that was rammed through the state legislature on the last day - including via some corrupt means by House Speaker Jimmy Naifeh. Bredesen tells the Nashville City Paper he thinks it should be made more difficult for people to run for public office. For more on the incumbent-protection bill and how Naifeh broke the rules to pass it, click here. Bredesen also might not veto that big pension increase that lawmakers passed for themselves at the last minute.

The Thursday City Paper has an editorial urging veto of the pension increase but supporting the incumbent protection bill.

June 14, 2006

Blogging Baptists Update

The Wednesday Tennessean notes the role of blogs in electing the next president of the Southern Baptist Convention...

Frank Page, pastor of First Baptist Church in Taylors, S.C., said yesterday his selection represented a "new day" for the Nashville-based denomination - which remains united in its conservatism on social issues and the belief that the Bible is the literal word of God - but divided in recent months over management and other doctrinal issues. ...

[Oklahoma pastor Wade] Burleson, among the best-known Internet bloggers who have criticized the current Southern Baptist leadership, said the computer bloggers were key to Page's selection. "Page may have started out as the underdog," Burleson said. "But I attribute the fact (he won) to young men and women on blogs."

Burleson said the fact that Page had edged out more established conservative leaders marked a turning point at the convention, where there have been few contested elections since conservatives took over the denomination in the 1970s and 1980s, forcing out more moderate Baptists.

"I believe it's a turning point," Burleson said. "But it's not a theological turning point. Baptists should go away saying that every Baptist counts. It's no longer kingmakers. It's people at the grassroots."

Burleson's blog has a lengthy post about the events at the SBC meeting, including a discussion of how blogs are impacting the SBC. Excerpt:
When Frank's election was announced I was walking around the arena and just happened to be stopped by a reporter in the undergound hallway. He wanted my reaction. Soon other reporters stopped and by the time all was said and done probably over 25 media persons from around the nation stood four deep and asked questions for forty minutes. One of the questions that kept being repeated over and over again is whether or not I believed blogs played a role in this election. I said, "Absolutely." Baptist bloggers in 2006 may well go down in history as the first time bloggers actually determined the outcome of a national religious/political election.

Why? When all three candidates were being nominated my wife leaned over to me and said, "I feel like I know all three men because of the blogs."

In a post from Monday, Burleson wrote:
Micah Fries and John Stickley over at Friesville will be posting interviews with key people at the SBC.

These men interviewed me this morning as we sat in a cafe in the Courtyard of the Sheraton Four Seasons with thousands of messengers attending the break out sessions at the hotel. Micah asked some excellent questions and hopes to have his interview with me and others up by later this afternoon.

Check it out! This is another example of the way the information age is changing the face of our convention.

Blogs = change.

Update: Well, not really an update, but the Associated Baptist Press ran a story on June 5 saying blogs were making the upcoming SBC meeting controversial.

Blogs have already revolutionized secular politics, and whether a subset of them have revolutionized Baptist politics will be seen at the Southern Baptist Convention's annual meeting June 13-14 in North Carolina.

The meeting, in Greensboro, will feature the first seriously contested SBC presidential election in a decade and several other controversial business items. The combination will likely produce the most contentious convention meeting since 1991, when moderates left after an epic struggle with fundamentalists over control of the nation's largest Protestant denomination.

But this time, the struggle is between fellow conservatives. Internal tensions have been thrust into the SBC spotlight mainly by bloggers -- the ever-expanding network of ideological entrepreneurs who analyze and pontificate on their own websites.

In the year since the SBC last met, reform-minded bloggers in the denomination have begun to form their own community on the Internet...

In case you're wondering, I'm not Baptist, though my basic belief on the theology of salvation - it's by grace alone - is much closer to that of the Baptists than it is the works-based salvation I learned as a child. My wife is Baptist. My preference is for a non-denominational church of no particular denominational heritage.

I'm more interested in this story because of the impact of blogs, not the religious/theological issues. I find it fascinating to watch, and wonder if the old-guard leadership of the SBC really understands what just happened, what changes the blogs hath wrought, and what bigger changes are ahead, thanks to the democratization of information publishing enabled by blogs, cheap digital video and related technologies ...

June 13, 2006

Tracks

traintrack01color.jpg

Train tracks where the railroad cross Lewisburg Pike near downtown Franklin, TN. See this and more of my photos at my Flickr page, including the black-and-white version of this shot.

Angel Waiting

angel023bw.jpg

I shot this at a junk store on Lewisburg Pike in Franklin, TN. The angel statue is priced at $35. I'm hoping nobody buys it anytime soon because I'd like to photograph it some more, at different times of the day, in different light. See more of my photos at my Flickr page, including the color version of this shot.

Posted by Bill in Photoblogging. Permalink | Comments (3)

Illegal Immigrant Kills Two

A couple of Americans from the Nashville suburb of Mt. Juliet are dead because the federal government refuses to secure its southern border and enforce its immigration laws. The Tennessean incorrectly refers to the killer as "a Madison man," though he appears to be in the country illegally.

A 27-year-old Madison man was charged with vehicular homicide Monday in the deaths of a Mt. Juliet couple killed in a car crash Thursday. Gustavo Garcia Reyes of 814 Anderson Lane was booked into Metro Jail on charges of vehicular homicide and evading arrest, Metro police spokesman Don Aaron said.

He is being held without bond. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has placed a detainer on Reyes because he appears to be an illegal immigrant, police said.

The more correct way to write this story:

A 27-year-old illegal immigrant living illegally in Madison was charged with vehicular homicide Monday in the deaths of a Mt. Juliet couple killed in a car crash Thursday.

Border security is not always just an economic issue, or a national security issue. Sometimes it's a personal safety issue too. Sean Paul Wilson, 38, and his wife, Donna Lynne Wilson, 47, both of Mt. Juliet, would be alive today if the federal government was doing its job.

Posted by Bill in Immigration.