![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Our Well-Paid Legislators | Main | On TennCare and Corrupt Legislators » May 29, 2005Bipartisan Bredesen
The Republican caucus had a meeting with Governor this morning. He brought up how we need a bipartisan effort, how he works with us to help the state, and how he invites us to attend when grants are given out in our districts. He said we need to work together for our state to fix TennCare, how he has an open door policy and how he returns phone calls so help him out now.When he was running for governor, Gov. Bredesen marketed himself as an experienced healthcare executive able to fix TennCare. But three years later he hasn't fixed it, and his lack of a plan to fix it means a quarter of a million or more sick, old, disabled and poor Tennesseans may soon be without healthcare. You would think that, with TennCare reform a pressing issue, Gov. Bredesen would want to consult with a physician legislator like state Rep. Joey Hensley, a doctor from Hohenwald who was elected to the legislature at the same time Bredesen was elected governor. But even though both have worked in the same building for more than two years, the sad truth is that Bredesen has not even bothered to introduce himself to Hensley, much less involve him in the TennCare reform discussions. Why? Because Hensley is a Republican. And Bredesen is a Democrat. That's not bipartisan. It's not good leadership, either. But it's the Bredesen way. UPDATE: Bruce Barry is praising Hensley's effort - to save 67,000 TennCare enrollee's coverage - a proposed budget amendment killed by Bredesen's allies. Barry: Rep. Joey Hensley's (R-Hohenwald) amendment to the budget bill would have steered that money away from Gov. Bredesen's plans to beef up the state's health care "safety net." Well-intentioned though the safety net plans are, moving the money back into TennCare makes sense because then it would draw $180 million of federal matching funds. Last time I checked, $280 million for health care for otherwise uninsured sick people beats $100 million every time.Barry is right - Hensley's proposal was a good one. In the absense of a true TennCare reform plan - which Bredesen clearly does not have - it was simply wrong morally and fiscally to spend that $100 million on a "safety net" that will provide less healthcare and for fewer people than the TennCare those enrollees will be losing. Let the record show that it was a Republican doctor that tried to save those people, and a Democratic governor and healthcare multi-millionaire who didn't. And let the record also show that on the day Bredesen signs the $26 billion budget for fiscal year 2005-06 into law, he will break the biggest promise he made when seeking the governor's office in 2002: He promised to fix TennCare, not to gut it. Comments
Great post! I feel like I am in the Twilight Zone, though. Have the Republicans always been in favor of saving TennCare? Where were they earlier in the game? Or are they now in favor of TennCare just because they see Bredesen wants to axe it? Then they can try to use this as a play to show how much they care about the "little people". Again were they trying to save TennCare before we got to this point? I really don't know the answer to this, but I'd like to. Posted by: Kevin at May 29, 2005 7:48 PMSo just how long have Republicans been in favor of saving TennCare? And where were they in addressing the issues of TennCare before it got to this critical stage. I may be wrong, but it appears that Republicans were only going to try and save TennCare after Bredesen decided to axe it all together. Do the Republicans really care about the people on Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||