About | Portfolio | Backup | Archives | PayPal Tip Jar | Amazon Tip Jar | Shop@Amazon
Advertising


Search BillHobbs.com
Stats, Etc.


TTLB Ecosystem Stats
Powered by FeedBurner


« Dictator Update: WKRN Story | Main | Why So Much GOP Support for Bredesen's Pre-K Boondoggle? »

April 29, 2005

Dictator Update: More Press Coverage

The Nashville City Paper and Knoxville News Sentinel both have stories today on House Speaker Jimmy Naifeh and his abuse of power regarding HB 887. The Tennessean has ignored the story entirely. The City Paper's story reveals something unflattering about state Rep. Chris Newton, R-Benton, while the News-Sentinel story only reveals that Tom Humphrey is a very biased writer.

From the City Paper:

The bill passed the House Constitutional Protections subcommittee Wednesday on a voice vote. The committee is the very place the bill is killed each year – one of a similar nature was killed there last week. Because two Democrats were absent at the time of the vote, the legislation passed the committee, which typically has a Democratic majority.

However, Naifeh (D-Covington) asked subcommittee chairman Rep. Chris Newton (R-Benton) to re-refer the bill to the committee because the panel had started early and legal staff were still absent from the room. Newton made a motion to re-refer the bill to the committee Wednesday, after which a number of Republicans objected. Naifeh gaveled the bill back to the committee without entertaining the GOP objections.

Newton did Naifeh's bidding. Newton is a Republican and a co-sponsor of HB 887, yet when Naifeh, the Democratic Speaker of the House, told him to send the bill back to the subcomittee, Newton barked like Naifeh's little lap dog.

The Knoxville News Sentinel story today by Tom Humphrey presents a very pro-Naifeh version of events and virtually ignores his deliberate failure to follow House rules Wednesday, and his rude treatment of Republican legislators who were merely asking for House rules to be adhered to. Those who believe Humphrey is a biased reporter who favors Democrats won't change their minds after reading his story. He reports that Republicans "accused ... Naifeh of unfairly killing legislation" but does not give readers any details of how Naifeh did it. There's no mention of his passing the motion on a "voice vote" in which no one voted aye, no mention of his refusal to recognize legislators who were raising their hands to call for a roll-call vote, and no mention of his rude treatment of Republicans, ordering them to "put your hands down."

Blake Wylie at Nashville Files has the video clip, courtesy of Ben Cunningham. Every single TV station and newspaper website in Tennessee can now download it and make it available to their readers and viewers online or on air. I'm betting most of them won't.

Naifeh's version of events is an unverifiable claim that the subcommittee meeting at which the bill was passed started before it was supposed to, so two Democrats who would have voted against the bill weren't there. Newton, chairman of the subcommittee, says the meeting started on time.

The big question is this: Why did Newton, a co-sponsor of the legislation, cooperate with Naifeh to have it sent back to the committee, where it will most certainly be killed next week?

Rep. Newton, what good is it for you,a Republican, to be a subcommittee chairman if you are going to collaborate with the Democratic majority to kill legislation the Democratic Speaker wants killed?

(Editor's note: I emailed Rep. Newton asking him for an explanation of these events. He has not responded.)

UPDATE: Espo has some further thoughts on the Knoxville News Sentinel's slanted, incomplete and inaccurate coverage, and on whether state Rep. Harry Tindell, D-Knoxville, his legislator, really supports common-sense self-defense legislation or not.

Posted in | Linked By |

Comments

Just read the City Paper report. It's funny--I spoke with a legislator who said when Newton was asked why he was agreeing to make the motion, that he (Newton) replied that he and the Speaker met privately and had a meeting of the minds. He continued by saying that he (Newton) had everything taken care of.

I guess he wasn't lying--he meant he had everything "taken care of" for Naifeh. But I wonder what he received in return at this private meeting in order to make the deal?

Although inappropriate language would be more colorful, I'll boil it down to the mere observation that Newton is Naifeh's poodle.

This is nothing new---but this occasion finally brought it out in the open.

Thank goodness George Washington wasn't interested in a pat on the head from the King. Judas Newton may have his pieces of silver--but he receives no glory for principle.

Posted by: Terry at April 29, 2005 9:18 AM

Bill: Great Site! Keep fighting for my fellow Tennesseans. I have made some of my contacts in the 22nd District aware of the story. Cheers from Florida!! JC Bowman

Posted by: JC Bowman at April 29, 2005 11:29 AM
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!









Remember personal info?






Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




back to top
Lamar!

Find the Good
and Praise It
I Also Blog At...
button-fcs-blog.gif
Advertising

Archives
Blogroll