About | Portfolio | Backup | Archives | PayPal Tip Jar | Amazon Tip Jar | Shop@Amazon
Advertising


Search BillHobbs.com
Stats, Etc.


TTLB Ecosystem Stats
Powered by FeedBurner


« Blogging@Work | Main | TdF Explained »

July 16, 2004

The myth that won't die ... might.

Dr. Bill Fox, the University of Tennessee economist and business professor who has authored a series of studies for the National Governors Association and National Conference of State Legislatures claiming that e-commerce was going to cost state governments fantastic amounts of "lost" sales tax revenue, has begun to climb down from the claim, reducing his forecast of future lost revenue by 57 percent.

State and local governments in the United States may not lose as much money as they previously thought when Internet retailers fail to collect sales tax, according to a new University of Tennessee study released on Thursday.

Online shopping and electronic commerce have not been as robust as anticipated years ago, leading researchers, hired by two national groups representing state officials, to lower their estimate of sales tax revenue losses by $26 billion in 2006.

"The experience of the last several years indicated that e-commerce has been a less robust channel for transacting goods and services than was anticipated when we prepared earlier estimates," said the report, written by William Fox, director of the university's Center for Business and Economic Research.

Fox's latest report was funded by the NGA and NCSL, which both support an effort by a group of states to simplify their sales tax structures in the hope that Congress will let them tax purchases by residents from out-of-state online merchants.
The university's report from 2001 pegged 2006 revenue losses at $45.2 billion. Now, researchers see 2006 losses of $19.2 billion.
The latest Fox study still relies on estimates from Forrester Research, as did his earlier forecasts, and Fox still dismisses the actual data on ecommerce from the U.S. Census Bureau, which is proving to be more accurate. Still, it's major news that Fox has admitted his earlier forecasts were wildly wrong. As HobbsOnline reader Ben Cunningham, who tipped me to the story today, says, "This must have been a difficult admission since he was being funded by bureacrats that would have loved a different result."

That Fox has admitted he was wrong is (or at least ought to be) major news in Tennessee, where Dr. Fox is a tireless cheerleader for the creation of a state income tax. His previous study is the source of the claim that online sales cost Tennessee state government $300 million a year in "lost" revenue. The Tennessee media often repeats that $300 million figure in its news and editorial coverage of the state budget and taxes as if it is incontrovertible fact, even though more than a year ago - as reported here at HobbsOnline, research from the Direct Marketing Association

contradicts and criticizes a series of University of Tennessee studies that had predicted much higher losses of sales tax revenue due to e-commerce. Those UT studies confused different types of online transactions and relied on fuzzy numbers and wildly-exaggerated estimates to arrive at its inflated figure.
Tennessee's media uses the $300 figure all the time, and rarely reports the DMA study that called it into serious question.

Now that Fox has admitted he was wrong ... will the Tennessee media start to get it right?

Stay tuned.

Posted in | Linked By |

Comments

I guess you need to revisit this given today's article on the front page of the Nashville City Paper.

Posted by: Coach Slacker at July 20, 2004 1:36 PM

Why would that be, Coach? Looks like Hobbs is right.

Posted by: Hobbs Fan at July 20, 2004 4:10 PM

I meant "revisit" the part about the myth dying. I agree with you and appreciate Bill Hobbs's reporting on this subject.

Posted by: Coach Slacker at July 21, 2004 7:48 AM
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!









Remember personal info?






Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




back to top
Advertising

blog advertising is good for you
Video Ad Slot
To run your video ad here, contact me at bill-at-billhobbs.com
Archives
Blogroll