![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Michael Moore Is a Big Fat Stupid White Man | Main | Viewed From The Ivory Tower » July 1, 2004Tennessee Tax Study Commission Member Pushes Income Tax
As to education, any number of comparisons of education spending across the various states has proven that the level of spending per student does not correlate to education success. One study, for example, showed that Utah spends the least and Washington D.C. the most on public education per-student, yet the students in Utah are far better educated. Porter also claims that the lack of an income tax (he calls it our "antiquated" tax structure) is keeping big companies from moving here. If that's true, then why in the last year or so have several large corporations moved to Tennessee? And why for years has the state's Department of Economic Development touted the lack of a state income tax as a reason for companies to move here? Answer: the state's lack of an income tax is a net positive for economic development. As to the tax structure, Porter ignores the state's rapidly growing revenue surplus, and ignores the data from the last several years showing Tennessee's sales tax delivered faster revenue growth than did most state income taxes. The simple fact is, had Tennessee adopted the kind of tax reform Porter advocates - lowering the sales tax and replacing the lost revenue with a progressive income tax - when it was first recommended five years ago, Tennessee's budget crises of the last few years would have been worse, with larger deficits and deeper spending cuts and calls for larger tax increases. The data also shows that the Tennessee legislature has been increasing spending faster than is warranted by inflation and population growth, and has routinely flouted the state constitution's cap on the year-over-year growth of spending of state tax dollars, a cap tied to the growth of the state's economy as measured by the growth of personal income. It's a measure chosen specifically to keep spending growth within range of the people's ability to pay the bill. Two years ago, the legislature raised the state sales tax by a penny, increasing revenue by about $1 billion. Not ironically, that's almost the same total amount by which the legislature had busted the spending cap during the previous few years. Tennessee's budget crises were always as the anti-income side claimed: driven by out-of-control spending, not an inadequate tax structure. Had Tennessee's legislature lived within the constitutional spending cap since it was enacted in 1978, instead of exceeding the cap 12 out of the last 20 years by a total of more than $3 billion, Tennessee government today would be leaner and more efficient, taxes would be lower, the state would be even more attractive to business, the state's economy would be healthier, and Tennessee would be sitting on an annual revenue surplus in excess of $1 billion. Sadly, as Tim Chavez documented in a recent Tennesseean commentary that - unlike Porter's - relied on facts and served up real data instead of an emotional/rhetorical appeal, the legislature this past session, with the full support of Gov. Phil Bredesen, returned to its cap-exceeding ways, putting Tennessee right back on the path to a budget crisis the next time the economy turns a little sluggish. They never learn. And things like Porter's fact-free op-ed don't help. For more Tennessee tax and budget truth and facts, spend some time in my Tennessee Budget & Tax Policy archive. And if you really want to know how Tennessee spent itself into a budget crisis in the 1990s - and the only real way to prevent it from happening again - read this white paper. (PDF, 17 pages) Comments
Louisiana pacific moved its HQ from Portland, OR to Tennessee in the last year. There was a lot of hand-wringing here (OR) over why this happened. A comparison of corporate tax structures showed some benefit to the move, but the difference in personal taxes to the top execs is huge. Those guys got six-figure annual "raises" for leaving Oregon's progressive tax hell. The idiot Mayor of PDX keeps yammering about "quality of life". Another few hundred grand a year would induce me to live most anywhere, and take weekends in the Carribean if I wanted 'quality'. Posted by: tom d at July 3, 2004 1:13 PMI had Dr. Porter for an accounting class this past semester and he made several references about the so-called antiquated tax structure in Tennessee. The class was a mix of cost management and ethics principles. What gets me is that Porter speaks of ethics and pounds his chest as if he is holier than thou, but yet he himself has acted unethical in many ways during this past semester in class. Such as testing over subject material that he is required to go over and yet he never did in opposition to university policies. So, can an unethical accountant actually give valid information and data that could help influence our current tax structure? Better yet, is Dr. Porter following the ethic principle of objectivity? I think not! Dr. Porter admitted to our class that the corporate world moved too fast for him, so that is why he decided to just teach instead. Dr. Porter spent a VERY minimal amount of time in the REAL world and unlike Steve Gill, Porter will always have job because he has tenure and especially if there is a state income tax. So, instead of criticizing Steve Gill about his motivations for not wanting an income tax, I think Dr. Porter needs to be more intellectually honest why he wants a state income tax! So, it seems to me, that Dr. Porter is in violation of three of the ethical principles that he taught this past semester: integrity, competency, and objectivity. He has no integrity because he is not being honest why he wants a state income tax. He is not being objective because he works for an institution that would benefit greatly from a state income tax and therefore he presents biased reports and information that only shows pro state income tax numbers. Finally, he is incompetent because he has spent more years as an educator of theories instead of working in the real world where theories, a lot of times, just don’t work out! Posted by: TSU Student at December 16, 2004 10:51 AMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||