![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
« Adding It Up | Main | Meeting Chance » April 28, 2004The CrusadesThis may be the best commentary any American newspaper has yet published about the war against Islamist terror. I found it via Donald Sensing. Excerpt: Read the whole thing. It's by Phil Lucas, executive editor of the Panama City New Herald in Panama City, Florida - an editor who had the courage to tell the real truth about the war we're in and the enemy we face. Half a century ago, a popular American slogan was "Better Dead than Red." Today, you'd probably get called out and accused of intolerance and hate speech by the diversity police if you slapped a bumper sticker on your car that said: "Better Dead than Muslim." But if we don't fight the war now - in the enemy's homeland - we may one day find ourselves facing that choice. Comments
Today, you'd probably get called out and accused of intolerance and hate speech by the diversity police if you slapped a bumper sticker on your car that said: "Better Dead than Muslim." But if we don't fight the war now - in the enemy's homeland - we may one day find ourselves facing that choice.
Those who tolerate everything, 'Course, now, that tees 'em off, too.... Posted by: Bithead at April 28, 2004 2:42 PMLet's recap the Crusades. Muslims invaded Europe and when they reached sufficient numbers they imposed their intolerant religion upon Westerners by force. Christian monarchs drove them back and took the battle to their homeland. This is the crux of the article, and it is pretty much wrong. It also leaves out some interesting facts, such as the fact that the so-called "Christians" were every bit as intolerant and every bit as nuts about forcing their religion on everybody under their rule. Read a bit about Galileo if you don't understand this. He was threatened with torture for such silliness as claiming that the moon isn't a polished sphere. The difference, and this is a biggy, is that European culture was able to overcome that, mainly I believe because of literacy and the printing press. That Muslim culture is now where Western culture was 600+ years ago is scary, particularly since they have the modern weaponry (some of it, at least) with the medievil mindset. Another note is that Western culture and Americans in particular are historically ignorant. To say that we're "forgiving" and that's why the Crusades are no big deal is silly; most Americans don't know anything about the Crusades. The Crusades have fallen from our collective memory while being kept very alive by the Arab/Muslim culture of victimhood. And it's that culture of victimhood that needs to be changed. Posted by: Michael Chaney at April 28, 2004 2:43 PMMichael, The Christian West didn't just wake up one morning and decide to launch a 200-year war against the Islamic world. By the time the Christians launched the Crusades, there were Muslim military emplacements within 100 miles of Rome. The Christians had a duty to fight back, just as we do today. Posted by: Bill Hobbs at April 28, 2004 2:48 PMLet's recap the Crusades. Muslims invaded Europe and when they reached sufficient numbers they imposed their intolerant religion upon Westerners by force. Christian monarchs drove them back and took the battle to their homeland. The fight lasted a couple of centuries, and we bottled them up for 1,000 years. Is this a joke? It would be funny, if it weren't so scary. I hereby commit Phil Lucas to re-take Medieval History. (or take it at all) Anybody catch Lord of the Rings? You know, the good part, the part that wasn’t fiction, the part that drew us to the books and movies because it was the truest part: the titanic struggle between good and evil, between freedom and enslavement, between the individual and the state, between the celebration of life and the worshipping of death. You know, I find it hilarious that you can resort to citing this sort of racist, ignorant demagoguery and then act all indignant about any parallels drawn to the rise of Nazism in Europe. This is truly disturbing stuff. Posted by: Chris Wage at April 28, 2004 3:50 PMYour link is bad. Try this instead. Posted by: evariste at April 28, 2004 4:15 PMYes there are parallels between the rise of Nazism in Europe and the rise of Islamism in the Middle East. Both are anti-Semitic fascist tyrannies worthy of eradication. Posted by: Bill Hobbs at April 28, 2004 4:20 PMYes there are parallels between the rise of Nazism in Europe and the rise of Islamism in the Middle East. Both are anti-Semitic fascist tyrannies worthy of eradication. Very clever. We're all aware I was referring to your post, not Islam. In fact, the more I think about it, you could practically write a bullet-point comparison of that piece with several Goebbels' speeches. In fact, I think I might! Posted by: Chris Wage at April 28, 2004 5:38 PMChris Wage = JadeGold? Posted by: anon at April 28, 2004 6:39 PMChris, I STRONGLY urge you to read the Koran before you open your mouth about the nature of Islam. And yes, I KNOW that you haven't because you would find it impossible to defend. These people divide the world into Them, and everyone else. Everyone else can surrender or die. Sorry, them first. Posted by: SDN at April 28, 2004 8:23 PMPost a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!
|
|||||||||||