BillHobbs.com is a frequently updated blog of original reporting and commentary by Bill Hobbs, a longtime Nashville journalist and media relations adviser. I am currently serving as communications director for the Tennessee Republican Party, a job I began on Oct. 29, 2007.
The Independence Institute, a Colorado think tank, has recently released the results of a study of the impact of the Taxpayers Bill of Rights a decade after it was adopted by voters in that state. Here is the summary:
Pre-TABOR, government jobs grew slightly more than business or total employment. After TABOR, business job growth nearly doubled that of government job growth.
The TABOR surplus rebate mechanism returned to taxpayers some $3.25 billion over five years, fiscal 1997 to 2001, amounting to about $800 per capita-$3,200 for an average family of four. TABOR is a success. It passed its own test to reasonably contain growth of Colorado government, taxing and spending.
For the first three years after passage of the TABOR amendment, the state did not exceed the revenue limitation so no surpluses were available, therefore no tax rebates. “In Fiscal Years 1996-97 through 2000-01, state revenues exceeded the TABOR limitation by $139.0 million, $563.2 million, $679.6 million, $941.1 million and $927.2 million, respectively.” This totals $3.25 billion returned to taxpayers, or a rough per capita estimate of a little over $800 - $3,200 for a family of four, during those five years.
Unfortunately, the legislature and the governor resorted to accounting gimmicks on the TABOR refund. As TABOR began to produce a surplus in 1997, to be distributed back to Colorado taxpayers, the General Assembly passed and Governor Romer signed HB98-1414, to postpone “this year’s excess.”
Apparently the legislature expected to use the next year’s excess to make the required refund. Using next year’s revenue to pay for this year’s refund worked fine until 2002-2003’s serious revenue downturn, when a refund was due, but there was no excess revenue. The 2002-2003 fiscal squeeze was a direct result of the 1998 legislature’s irresponsible decision to use an accounting trick so that spending could be increased. The 2003 legislature would have had a much easier budget session if the 1998 legislature had acted responsibly.
The TABOR Amendment of 1992 has worked well to achieve its stated intention to “slow government growth.” What TABOR really did was stop excess government growth. TABOR did not stop reasonable government growth; as we have seen, government continued to grow at the rate of population-plus-inflation. TABOR is simply undoing the spending spree of the 1980’s, not shrinking government to unrealistic levels. TABOR encourages elected officials to better set priorities and resist heavy special interest lobbying pressures. TABOR frees up capital in the private sector to create more wealth-creating jobs that boost productivity and output. Here are the TABOR results:
• Private sector job creation more than doubled while government job growth held steady.
• An average Colorado family paid about $16,700 less in state taxes during TABOR’s first decade.
• Per capita state taxes and spending growth had been growing far faster than inflation-plus-population. That extreme growth rate was halted.
• State government growth was very much in line with population-plus-inflation.
TABOR has succeeded. TABOR did not wreck the state economy or the state government, as its opponents had predicted. Instead, private-sector job creation and the state government were able to grow at a reasonable pace. Colorado families were able to retain much more of the fruits of their labor.
Incidentally, I made the same point about the Colorado legislature worsening its recent fiscal squeeze by its past action to delay rebating surpluses on page seven of this white paper.
The Taxpayer's Bill of Rights enjoys a love-hate relationship in Colorado. Taxpayers love it, and those who like to spend other people's money hate it.
You see, there is a well-funded effort, made to look like "consensus building," to dismantle TABOR. That's why you are going to hear a lot more TABOR- bashing in the next year or so.
And they're going insult you by saying that you didn't really understand what you were voting on back in 1992.
But, in fact TABOR did exactly what it promised to do. It limited the growth of government to population and inflation. Over the last decade inflation and population grew by 63 percent in Colorado. The size of state government grew by about 64 percent.
During the overheated late 1990s, the TABOR rebate mechanism returned $3.25 billion in state tax overpayments; that's about $800 for every man, woman and child, or $3,200 per family of four.
And if the economy heats up again, TABOR has a built-in mechanism that allows government to keep all the excess tax revenue it wants, even if there is budget "ratcheting." All they have to do is ask you if they can keep it. That's it.
TABOR-haters were disappointed that when they asked you to keep surplus tax money before, you sometimes said no. So they don't want to you to have that choice anymore.
They are afraid you might say no again. And they don't think no should mean no. They want to legalize fiscal date rape.
So why are we in a budget squeeze? In 2000 voters passed Amendment 23, which mandated increases in K-12 educational spending, even in slow economic times when there aren't any tax surpluses, squeezing out all other programs like higher education, corrections and health care. It's no wonder why the state budget is in trouble.
And TABOR had nothing to do with it.
MORE TABOR-related links: Arvada, Parker put lodging tax on ballots - Denver Post, August 20, 2003. A report on two towns having to ask permission from residents to raise taxes - a right TABOR gives to citizens. Dissecting TABOR for taxpayers - Cortez Journal, August 9, 2003. A very one-sided report featuring only the views of the anti-TABOR Bell Policy Center, a leftwing pro-Big Government think tank in Colorado. I've written more about the Bell Policy Center here and here. The Bell Policy Center claims it is "nonpartisan," but not even the Denver Post believes it, instead describing the Bell Policy Center as "a left-leaning nonprofit founded two years ago by several funds and individuals, including the gay-rights advocacy group the Gill Foundation." The BPC is the spearhead of the attack on the Taxpayers Bill of Rights in Colorado.
Posted in
Comments
The TABOR spending limitations have already been bypassed by the incredible tax growth in Special Districts. Fire, sanitation, redevelopment districts have been formed with taxing authority and wiped out any chance that I would vote for a state tax increase. The tax dollars the state needs are in the hands of special districts. I support a measure whereby the state taxes the special districts.
Posted by: August at March 26, 2005 12:42 PM
I've read several of the proposed measures that work to defang TABOR. I notice that the first thing listed to fund with the "excess" is health care, then (Surprise) education. No doubt we will hear commercial after commercial from the CEA and their friends about how we are, still, shortchanging our children.
Disgusted does not begin to describe my thoughts on yet another attack on my wallet!
Posted by: Jim at May 10, 2005 8:41 PM
Post a comment
Comments Policy: Your comment is subject to deletion if it is off-topic or includes foul language or personal attack. Readers, please email me if you find comments that include egregious violations of this policy. Comments may not post immediately - do not post twice!